Chapter 5 Auditing
Chapter 5 Auditing
Most people define unethical behavior as conduct that differs from what they
believe would have been appropriate given the circumstances. Each Of us decides
for ourselves what we consider unethical behavior, both for ourselves and
Others. It is important to understand what causes people to act in a manner that
we decide is unethical.
There are also many far less extreme examples when others violate our ethical
values. When people cheat on their tax returns, treat other people with hostility,
lie on employment applications, or perform below their competence level as
employees, most of us regard that as unethical behavior. If the other person has
decided that this behavior is ethical and acceptable, there is a conflict of ethical
values that is unlikely to be resolved.
The following example illustrates the difference between ethical standards that
differ from general society's and acting selfishly. Person A finds a briefcase in an
airport containing important papers and P 10,000. He tosses the briefcase and
Professional Ethics
Il 7
keeps the money. He brags to his family and friends about his good fortune.
Person A's values probably differ from most of society's. Person B faces the
same situation but responds differently. He keeps the money but leaves the
briefcase in a conspicuous place. He tells nobody and spends the money on a
new wardrobe. It is likely that Person B has violated his own ethical standards,
but he decided that the money was too important to pass up. He has chosen to act
selfishly.
Everybody Does It
The argument that it is acceptable behavior to falsify tax returns, cheat on
exams, or sell defective products is commonly based on the rationalization that
everyone else is doing it and therefore it is acceptable.
Using the argument that all legal behavior is ethical relies heavily on the
perfection of laws. Under this philosophy, one would have no
obligation to return a lost object unless the other person could prove that it
was his or hers.
This philosophy relies on evaluating the likelihood that someone else will
discover the behavior. Typically, the person also assesses the severity of the
All of the recognized professions have several common characteristics. The most
important of these characteristics are (a) a responsibility to serve the public, (b) a
complex body of knowledge, (c) standards of admission to the profession, and (d)
a need for public confidence. Let us briefly discuss these characteristics as they apply
to public accounting.
licensed, certified public accountants must adhere to the ethics of the profession or
risk disciplinary action.
The following list of ethical principles incorporates the characteristics and values
that most people associate with ethical behavior.
Integrity
Be principled, honorable, upright, courageous and act on convictions; do not be
two-faced, or unscrupulous, or adopt an end-justifies-the-means philosophy
that ignores principle.
Honesty
Be truthful, sincere, forthright, straightforward, frank, candid; do not cheat, steal,
lie, deceive, or act deviously.
Promise Keeping
Be worthy of trust, keep promises, full commitments, abide by the spirit as well
as the letter of an agreement; do not interpret agreements in an unreasonably
•technical or legalistic manner in order to rationalize noncompliance or create
excuses and justifications for breaking commitments.
Professional Ethics 120
Loyalty (Fidelity)
Be faithful and loyal to family, friends, employers, clients and country; do not use or
disclose information learned in confidence; in a professional context, safeguard the
influences and conflicts of interest.
Fairness
Be fair and open-minded, be willing to admit error and, where appropriate, change
positions and beliefs, demonstrate a commitment to justice, the equal treatment of
individuals, and tolerance for and acceptance of diversity; do not overreach or take
undue advantage of another's mistakes or adversities.
Responsible Citizenship
Obey just laws; if all law is unjust, openly protest it; exercise all democratic rights
and privileges responsibly by participation (voting and expressing informed views),
social consciousness, and public service; when in a position of leadership or
authority, openly respect and honor democratic processes of decision making, avoid
unnecessary secrecy or concealment of information, and assure that others have all
the information they need to make intelligent choices and exercise their rights.
Pursuit of Excellence
Pursue excellence in all matters; in meeting your personal and professional
responsibilities- be diligent, reliable, industrious, and committed; perform all
tasks to the best of your ability, develop and maintain a high degree of
competence, be well informed and well prepared; do not be content with
mediocrity; do not "win at any cost."
Accountability
Be accountable, accept responsibility for decisions, for the foreseeable
consequences of actions and inactions, and for setting an example of others.
Parents, teachers, employers, many professionals, and public officials have a
121 Chapter
special obligation to lead by example, to safeguard and advance the integrity and
reputation of their families, companies, professions, and the government itself;
an ethically sensitive individual avoids even the appearance of impropriety, and
takes whatever actions are necessary to correct or prevent inappropriate conduct
of others.
The reputation of the accounting profession continues to be tarnished by the
scandals over the last two decades and continuing into the new millennium. TO
regain our status as one of the most highly respected professions, we must take the
extra step to show both the public and ourselves that we are indeed ethical — and
that our ethics are based upon a strict set of moral principles rather than just a long
list ofrules to which we only adhere in certain situations.
The 2018 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants in the Philippines consists
of three parts, namely:
Fundamental Principles
Professional Ethics 122
(a) Integrity
(b) Objectivity
(c) Professional Competence and Due Care
(d) Confidentiality
(e) Professional Behavior
5. Intimidation /
Adverse I I. with
Accountant will
objectivity
not act
because
1. Threatened
litigation
or actual
between
Undue of interests opposed to the accountant and a client. CPA
influence clients interests. 2. firm is threatened with
dismissal.
2. Accountant will
An individual associated
subordinate judgment to 3. with a client threatens to
that of an individual withdraw or terminate a
associated with a client
due to client's reputation,
professional service unless
expertise, dominant
the accountant reaches
personality, or attempts to
certain judgments or
coerce or excessively
conclusions.
influence the acc0untant.
4. Accountant assumes a
Accountant will take on
3. the role of client client's role while
management or otherwise performing non-audit
assume management services.
5. A gift from the client that is
responsibilities.
other than clearly
insignificant.
Professional standards.
Professional or regulatory monitoring and disciplinary procedures.
External review by a legally empowered third party of the reports, returns
communications or information produced by a professional accountant.
In the following sections, we discuss the various Code of Ethics Rules as they apply to
accountants in public practice.
and shall apply safeguards, when necessary, to eliminate or reduce the threats to
an acceptable level.
Sections 250.1 and 250.2 of the Revised Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants in the Philippines, provide the guidelines in marketing professional
services as follows:
1. When a professional accountant in public practice solicits new work
through advertising or other forms of marketing, there may be potential
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles. For example, a self
interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional behavior is
created if services, achievements or products are marketed in a way that is
inconsistent with that principle.
2. A professional accountant in public practice should not bring the
profession into disrepute when marketing professional services. The
professional accountant in public practice should be honest and truthful
and should not:
• Make exaggerated Claims for services offered, qualifications possessed
or experience gained, or
• Make disparaging references to unsubstantiated comparisons to the
work of another,
Professional Ethics 130
The practitioner should be guided by the provisions in the PRCBOA
Resolution No. 126, series of 2008 on Rules on Advertising and
Promotion for the Practice of Accountancy in the Philippines.
public.
Where the gifts or hospitality offered is made in the normal course of business
without the specific intent to influence decision making or to obtain information,
it may be concluded that any threat to compliance with the fundamental
principles is at an acceptable level. When the threats cannot be eliminated or
reduced to an acceptable level through the application of safeguards, the
professional accountant in public practice should not accept such an offer.
Independence (290)
CPA firm independence from a client is required when providing audit and other
attestation and assurance services.
Financial Relationships
The Code restricts the financial interests that an auditing may have either in
the client itself or with client personnel. A financial interest is an ownership
interest in an equity or a debt security issued by an entity; such an
interest may be either direct or indirect. A direct financial interest includes
an investment in the client, such as owning capital stock or providing loans
to the client. An indirect financial interest generally involves an intermediary
of some sort; for example, assume that a CPA invest in a mutual fund, which
in turn owns stock in a client of that CPA. The CPA's portion of that
investment in the attest client is the indirect financial interest. Concerning
direct and indirect financial relationships of external auditors:
133 Chapter 5
l) All direct financial interests are prohibited, regardless of amount.
2) Material indirect financial interests are prohibited.
In the case of a member of the audit team, unless any such financial interest
is immaterial and 'the relationship is insignificant to that member, the
individual shall be removed from the audit team.
audit team and the immediate family member, and the client;
• The financial interest is immaterial to the investor or groups of investors;
and
• The financial interest does not give the investor, or group of investors, the
ability to control the closely-held entity.
If a former member of the audit team or partner of the firm has joined the audit
client in such a position and significant connection remains between the firm and
the individual, the threat would be so significant that no safeguards could reduce the
threat to an acceptable level. Therefore, independence would be deemed to be
compromised if a former member of the audit team or partners joins the
audit client as a director or officer, or an employee in a position to exert
significant influence over the preparation of the client's accounting records or
the financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion,
unless:
135 Chapter 5
a) The individual is not entitled to any benefits or payments from the firm,
unless made in accordance with fixed pre-determined arrangements, and
any amount owed to the individual is not material to the firm; and
If a former partner of the firm has previously joined an entity in such a position
and the entity subsequently becomes an audit client of the firm, the significance
of any threat to independence shall be evaluated and safeguards applied when
necessary to eliminate the threat or reduce it to an acceptable level. Examples
of such safeguards include:
Generally, the lending of staff by a firm to an audit client may create a self
review threat. However, such assistance may be given for only a short period
of time and the firm's personnel shall not be involved in:
(a) Providing non-assurance services that would not be permitted under this
code, or
(b) Assuming management responsibilities.
The significance of any threat shall be evaluated and safeguards applied when necessary
to eliminate or reduce the threat to an acceptable level. Examples of such safeguards
include:
l) Conducting additional review of the work performed by the loaned staff;
2) Not including the loaned staff as the member of auditing;
3) Not giving the loaned staff audit responsibility for any function that the staff
performed during the temporary staff assignment;
Professional Ethics 136
While the CPAs should not perform management functions or make management
decisions for the attest client, they may provide advice, research materials, and
recommendations to assist the client. In such circumstances, the client must agree
to
I) Assume all management responsibilities
2) Oversee the services, by designing an individual, preferably within senior
management, who possesses suitable skill, knowledge, and/or experience.
3) Evaluate the adequacy and results of the services performed.
4) Accept responsibility for the results of the services.
5) Establish and maintain internal control, including monitoring ongoing
activities.
Given the rules, there are certain activities that CPA firm personnel cannot
perform for the firm to retain independence with respect to the client.
Examples of these prohibited activities include
The firm may provide services related to the preparation pf accounting records
and financial statements to an audit client that is not a public interest entity
137 Chapter 5
where the services are of a routine or mechanical creature, so long as any
selfreview threat created is reduced to an acceptable level. Examples of such
services - include:
l) Payroll services based on client-originated data;
2) Recording transactions for which the client has determined or approved
the appropriate account classification;
3) Posting transactions coded by the client to the general ledger;
4) Posting client-approved entries to the trial balance; and
5) Preparing financial statements based on information in the trial balance.
a) Only the firm has the resources and necessary knowledge of the client's
systems and procedures to assist the client in the timely preparation of its
accounting records and financial statements, and
b) A restriction on the firm's ability to provide the services would result in
significant difficulties for the client (for example, as might result from a'
failure to meet regulatory reporting requirements).
I) Those who provide the services are not members of the audit
team;
2) The services are provides for only a short period of time and are not
expected to recur; and
3) The situation is discussed with those charged with governance.
Providing tax return preparation service does not generally create a threat to
independence if client takes responsibility for the returns including any significant
judgment' made. Tax return preparation services are generally based on historical
information and principally involved analysis and presentation of such historical
information under existing law, including precedents and established practice.
Furthermore, the tax returns are subject to review or approval process that the tax
authority deems appropriate.
The provision of the internal audit services to an audit client creates a self-review
threat to independence if the firm uses the internal audit work in the course Of a
subsequent external audit. The significance of the threat shall be evaluated and
safeguards applied when necessary to eliminate or reduce the threat to an
acceptable level. An example of such a safeguard is using professionals who are
not member of the audit team to perform the internal audit service.
Litigation involving the public accounting firm and the client also may affect
the independence of CPAs. The relationship between the CPAs and client
management must be characterized by complete candor and full disclosure. A
relationship with these characteristics may not exist when litigation places the
CPAs and client management in an adversarial position. CPAs in litigation, or
potential litigation, with a client must evaluate the situation to determine
whether the significance of the litigation affect the client's confidence in the
CPAs or the CPAs objectivity.
Legal services that support an audit client in executing legal action (e.g., •legal
advice, legal due diligence and restructuring) may create self-review threats.
The significance of any threat created shall be evaluated and safeguards
applied when necessary to eliminate or reduce the threat to an acceptable level.
The firm may generally provide such services as reviewing the professional
qualification of a number of applicants and providing the advice on their
suitability for the post. The firm may also interview and advise on candidate's
competence for financial accounting, administrative or control positions.
• Disclosing to the client any arrangements to receive a referral fee for referring the
client to another professional accountant in public practice.
Contingent fees are fees calculated on a predetermined basis relating to ther outcome
of a transaction or the result of the services performed by the firm. A fee is not
regarded as being contingent if established by a court or other public
authority.
Professional Ethics 142
Compensation and Evaluation Services (290.223)
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Questions
5. Why might the rule "Let conscience be your guide" not be suffcient
basis for your personal ethics decisions? For your
professional ethics decisions?
145 Chapter 5
6. What roles must a professional accountant be prepared to occupy in
regard to ethical decision problems?
12. Lea Sanchez, wife of Juan Sanchez, CPA, is a life insurance agent. May
Juan Sanchez refer audit clients needing officer life insurance to Lea
Sanchez or to another life insurance agent who will share a commission
with Lea Sanchez? Explain.
11. Which of the following •attributes is more closely associated with attestation
services performed by a CPA firm than with other lines of
professional work?
a. Integrity.
b. Competence.
c. Independence.
d. Keeping informed on current professional developments.
149 Chapter 5
12. Which of the following types of employees must be independent of an audit
client?
a. A partner in the office that performs the engagement.
b. Senior auditors assigned to the office that performs the audit.
c. Managers assigned to an office that does not participate in the engagement.
d. All firm professionals, regardless of their position.
13. Cruz & Santos CPAs has one office. Which of the following is lemt likely to
impair independence with respect to an audit client? a. The client owes the
firm for two prior years' audit fees.
b. A partner in the CPA firm is the son of the president of the client.
c. The husband of a partner in the firm has a small direct
financial interest in the client.
d. A partner in the firm has an investment in a mutual fund that has a
direct interest in the client.
Acc
22. Competence as a certified public accountant includes all of the
following
except:
a. Having the technical qualifications to perform an engagement.
b. Possessing the ability to supervise and to evaluate the quality Of staff
work.
c. Guaranteeing the accuracy of the work performed.
d. Consulting others if additional technical information is needed.
23. A client company has not paid its 20X6 audit fees.
Cases
Case 1
Tan and Caiada, a firm of certified public accountants, audited the accounts of
Sterling Skins, Inc., a corporation that imports and deals in skin wellness products.
Upon completion of the examination, the auditors supplied Sterling
153 Chapter 5
Skins with twenty copies of the certified statement of financial statements. The firm
knew in a general way that Sterling wanted that number of copies of the
auditor's report to furnish to banks and other potential lenders.
The statement of financial position in question was in error by approximately P800,000.
Instead of having a P600,000 net worth, the corporation was
insolvent. The management of Sterling Skins had doctored the books to avoid
bankruptcy. The assets had been overstated by P500,000 of fictitious and nonexistent
accounts receivable and P300,000 of nonexistent skin products listed as inventory when in
fact Sterling Skins had only empty boxes. The audit failed to detect these fraudulent entries.
JC, relying on the certified statement of financial position, loaned Sterling Skins P200,000.
They seek to recover their loss from Tan and Caiada.
Required:
State whether each of the following is true or false and give your reasons:
a. If JC alleges and proves negligence on the part of Tan and Caiada, he will be
able to recover his loss.
b. If JC alleges and proves constructive fraud (that is, gross negligence on the
part of Tan and Caiada) he will be able to recover his loss.
(AICPA Adapted)
Case 2
The CPA firm of Angeles, Belen, and Cruz was expanding very rapidly.
Consequently, it hired several junior accountants, including a man named Dantes.
The. partners of the firm eventually became dissatisfied with Dantes' production
and warned him that they would be forced to discharge him unless his output
increased significantly.
Professional Ethics 154
At that time, Dantes was engaged in audits of several Clients. He decided
that to avoid being fired, he would reduce or omit entirely some of the standard
auditing procedures listed in audit programs prepared by the partriers. One of the
CPA firm's clients, Best Corporation, was in serious. financial difficulty and had
adjusted several of the accounts being examined by Dantes to appear financially
sound. Dantes prepared fictitious working papers in his home at night to support
purported completion of auditing procedures assigned to him, although he in fact did
not examine ihe adjusting entries. The CPA firm rendered an unqualified opinion on
Best's financial statements, which were grossly misstated. Several creditors, relying
on the audited financial statements, subsequently extended large sums of money to
Best Corporation.
Required:
Would the CPA firm be liable to the creditors who extended the money
because of their reliance on the erroneous financial statements if Best Corpomtion
should fail to pay them? Explain.
(AICPA Adapted)
Case 3
Carlos, CPA, is the auditor for Jupiter Manufacturing Corporation, aa privately
owned company that has a June 30 fiscal year. Jupiter arranged for a substantial bank
loan that was dependent on the bank receiving, by September 30, audited financial
statements which showed a current ratio of at least 2 to I. On September 25, just
before the audit report was to be issued, Carlos received an anonymous letter on
Jupiter's stationery indicating that a lease by Jupiter, as lessee, of a factory
building accounted for in the financial statements as an operating lease was, in fact,
a capital lease. The letter stated that there was a secret written agreement with the
lessor modifying the lease and creating a capital lease.
Carlos confronted the president of Jupiter, who admitted that a secret agreement
existed but said it was necessary to treat the lease as an operating lease to meet
the current ratio requirement of the pending loan and that nobody would ever
discover the secret agreement with the lessor. The president said that if Carlos
did not issue his report by September 30, Jupiter would sue Carlos for substantial
damages that would result from not the loan. Under this pressure and because the
working papers contained a copy of the five—year lease agreement that
supported the operating lese treatment, Carlos issued his report with an
unqualified opinion on S«anber 29.
Required:
Answer the following questions, setting forth reasons for any conclusions stated:
155 Chapter 5
a. Is Carlos liable to the bank?
b. Is Carlos liable to the lessor?
c. Is there potential for criminal action against Carlos?
Case 4
Rain Tan recently joined the CPA firm of Base, Umapas & Canada. She quickly
established a reputation for thoroughness and a steadfast dedication to following prescribed
auditing procedures to the letter. On her third audit for the firm, Tan examined the
underlying documentation of two hundred disbursements as a test of purchasing, receiving,
vouchers payable, and cash disbursement procedures. In the process, she found
twelve disbursements for the purchase of materials that had no receiving
reports documentation. She
noted the exceptions in her working papers and called them to the attention of the in-charge
acc•ountant. Relying on prior experience with the client, the in-charge accountant
disregarded Tan's comments. Nothing further was done about the exceptions.,
Subsequently, it was learned that one of the client's purchasing agents and a member of
its accounting department were engaged in a fraudulent scheme to divert the receipt
of materials to a public warehouse while sending the
invoices to the client. When the client discovered the fraud, the conspirators had
diyerted approximately P70,000 in materials, P50,000 of it after the completion of the
audit.
Required:
a. Discuss the legal implications and liabilities to Base, Umapas & Caiada as a
result of these facts,
b. Discuss the legal implications and liabilities to Base, Umapas & Canada if the
CPA firm is a limited liability partnership.
Case 5
Gonzales & Esteban, CPAs, audited Nicole, Inc. The audit was deficient in •
several respects:
• Gonzales & Esteban failed to verify properly certain receivables that later
proved to be fictitious.
Professional Ethics 156
• With respect to other receivables, although they made a cursory check, they
failed to detect many accounts that were long overdue and obviously
uncollectible.
• No physical inventory was taken of the securities claimed to be in Nicole's
possession; which in fact had been sold. Both the securities and cash
received from the sales were listed on the statement of financial position as
assets.
There is no indication that Gonzales & Esteban actually believed that the
financial statements were false. Subsequent creditors, not known to Gonzales &
Esteban, are now suing based on the deficiencies in the audit as described above.
Gonzales & Esteban moved to dismiss the lawsuit against it on the basis that the
firm did not have actual knowledge of falsity and therefore did not commit fraud.
Required:
May the creditors recover without demonstrating that Gonzales & Esteban had
actual knowledge of falsity? Why or why not?