Wikiversity:Requests for Deletion/Archives/2

You are examining an archive of past discussions for transparent review by inquisitive participants.
Please ask questions and share your thoughts on the current discussion page.

Marcus Bibbigan - DELETED

Discussions are archived for review purposes. Please start a new discussion to discuss the topic further.

Hoax article, no Google results. Thanks, AP aka -- Sunstar NW XP 16:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 16:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - another note: also in case the mentioned gentleman exists, I see no relevance of this entry here --Gbaor 12:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely this could be speedy deleted? A clear hoax which is probably intended as an attack page. Adambro 20:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Thought it over, Adambro was right --Gbaor 04:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Ed for Pre School - DELETED, NEW PAGE

Discussions are archived for review purposes. Please start a new discussion to discuss the topic further.

Completely inappropriate content Donek (talk) - Go raibh mile maith agaibh 00:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely inappropriate and not an attempt at creating an educational resources at all and little prospect of it becoming one as it stands. Adambro 07:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There was also discussion about this on its talk page. The tone and title were obviously problematic, yet it is also a perfectly legitimate topic for WV if approached appropriately. WV has no content on sex education until now. So, I've moved to this page to a more generic title sex education, removed the silly stuff, and left it for now as a stub. Be bold and improve further. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recreate. Reason: the pedophile content could still show up in the history. So delete to erase the pedophile stuff. Then recreate a page with the better title chosen by Jtneill. --McCormack 12:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y Done deleted and restored with last available content on page. The original author can provide further info on the talk page. ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 10:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete again, no meaningful content. Adambro 16:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Happy for this to stay now as it seems that attempts are being made to develop it beyond the state it was in when I commented above. Adambro 10:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2620259/Compuslory-sex-education-for-children-under-five-proposed.html Emesee 02:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened? Why was the page deleted when opinions point to the opposite? Hillgentleman|Talk 15:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have left a note here, it was moved to Sex education, has been developed somewhat, but was then deleted and recreated because of the nature of the initial edit placed at Sex Ed for Pre School, and then the redirect that was at Sex Ed for Pre School was deleted. Please post here if you think something different should be done. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was confused by the note "orphaned redirect" in the log. Hillgentleman|Talk 00:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

drjayztekradio-related pages - DELETED

Discussions are archived for review purposes. Please start a new discussion to discuss the topic further.

user:drjayztekradio - At this time the following pages under this user name need to be completely removed from wikiversity for the following reasons:

(COMPANY VIOLATIONS PLEASE REFER TO GPL FOR PROPER USE (MODERATORS DELETE THIS PAGE))

All content and pages linking to this page need to be completely removed per order of NCR media within 48 hours of this request, failure to do so will result in copyright and violations notices being levied against wikiversity as the principle controlling authority of this information!

thank you for the prompt attention in this matter! --Ncrmedia 00:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide some evidence that there is a copyright problem. What Wikiversity text/image is problematical? Where was that text/image previously published? --JWSchmidt 01:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

linked pages include Talk:Wiki Campus Radio....I do not see how it makes sense to request that we delete such pages. --JWSchmidt 01:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the problem on one of these pages? --JWSchmidt 13:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found this: I will paste in a excerpt from our ever changing website which was linked to User:Drjayztekradio/history of ztek. The images on that page might be a problem. --JWSchmidt 13:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted two images that were used on User:Drjayztekradio/history of ztek since they had been uploaded with no description of their coyright/licensing status and seem to have come from http://zteknologies.com where it says "images are to property of this site and shall not be removed". --JWSchmidt 14:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted another image that was used at User:Drjayztekradio/the birth of ztek. --JWSchmidt 15:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All of these pages were previously vandalised - I take a sceptical view of this request, and I've reverted all page blankings for the time being. To Ncrmedia: can you email me with details of the problem with NCR? My email address is on my user page, or you can use the "Email this user" link on the left hand side of the user page. As JWSchmidt notes, we need evidence of a problem in order to take any action. Thanks, Cormaggio ^talk 14:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do the pages have any educational value? And then also, do users have ultimate say over content they create in their user space (i.e. user, user talk, and all subpages within user and user talk)? So, potentially, User:Drjayztekradio could simply have these deleted? Emesee 01:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was contacted by user:drjayztekradio and I deleted the pages. If anyone has any questions, please send me an email. --JWSchmidt 02:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki process - KEPT

Discussions are archived for review purposes. Please start a new discussion to discuss the topic further.

Empty article with meaningless title. Can anyone see any way of turning this into a useful learning resource? --McCormack 13:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added some context. Whether this is now useful... Emesee 20:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Bibbigan - DELETED

Sex Ed for Pre School - DELETED, NEW PAGE

drjayztekradio-related pages - DELETED

Wiki process - KEPT

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.