Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twins Days (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 08:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Twins Days (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:V, not enough coverage on media Monni (talk) 09:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 2. —cyberbot I NotifyOffline 09:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - well-known convention of twins. FWIW, I am a product of a multiple birth. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG.[1][2][3][4] FWIW, I'm not a product of a multiple birth. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 13:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. A subject of international press coverage ([5] and [6]), with a major claim of significance (see second link). SuperMarioMan 05:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 11:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.