Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRL September 1998
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 10:35, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- TRL September 1998 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced WP:Listcruft. Proposed deletion contested without comment by anonymous editor. Gurt Posh (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related articles, for the same reason:[reply]
- TRL October 1998 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- TRL November 1998 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- TRL December 1998 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All - as overly detailed trivia. A day by day account? Really? -- Whpq (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all TRL is surely a notable show, but there is absolutely no need to detail every single month of its existence on WP. If there are specific shows that are notable, they can be merged to the main page. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per WP:NOT#STATS. The list isn't notable neither in the context of the show, nor in the context of the artists mentioned. Rymatz (talk) 17:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all I think this may fail WP:COPYVIO. This article is a word-for-word copy of another webpage, format and all. If it doesn't the above arguments still have merit. Roodog2k (talk) 20:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.