Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Stone Woodard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 20:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Susan Stone Woodard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This biography of a living person does not cite any sources other than those of the person's own radio show. My prod was removed by the creator, but no independent sources were added, and I wasn't able to find any with my own search, so I'll send this to discussion to see if anyone else can find independent, reliable sources. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I cannot find any indpendent coverage in reliable sources. She is carried on just a few stations so the reach of her show as a radio broadcast is limited. -- Whpq (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 05:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Can't find any coverage of her in reliable independent sources. Sideways713 (talk) 20:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence found of notability (Nothing via Highbeam or Questia). AllyD (talk) 11:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.