Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakarganj

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shakarganj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I respect this article (under a different name) went to AfD in 2011 with a 2-!vote keep - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakarganj Mills Limited.

Despite this, what we have here is a smallish company - US$45 million in a country of 212 million people - for which we lack the WP:CORPDEPTH necessary to evidence notability. Gsearches come back with minimal routine coverage. Tagishsimon (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 18:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Was lucky enough to find international news coverage – Wall Street Journal business newspaper, Financial Times business newspaper as well as news coverage for this company in two major newspapers of Pakistan – Dawn newspaper and Business Recorder newspaper - company profiles and stock quotes. Many old references at the article had gone dead, I admit. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I missed removing one old dead reference, it's gone now. Ngrewal1 (talk) 01:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy