Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semi-beautiful
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted. Non-admin closure. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Semi-beautiful (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary Ryan Vesey contribs 16:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and probably not move to Wiktionary either. I'd nominate it for speedy deletion but I can't find appropriate criteria for this page. Rymatz (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per IAR. It's obvious that the definition contained in the article is in violation of WP:MADEUP. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowing in the middle of July Delete Agree with SoCalSuperEagle. We don't need to waste time discussing this here. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, G3 or A1. Hairhorn (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Foolishness. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.