Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saamana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing nomination. Excellent sourcing has been found, thank you to those who provided the sourcing. I appreciate your efforts. As promised, I will incorporate some of the sourcing into the article. (non-admin closure) Waggie (talk) 03:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Saamana

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Saamana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, only one source outside of their own website. Waggie (talk) 03:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. I fully acknowledge that the article is in terrible shape, but there are plenty of sources to be found: see [1] and [2]. Furthermore, the mouthpiece of a party which has a large presence in a region of a 100 million people has a strong claim to notability . I'll do my best to work on this soon. Vanamonde (talk) 04:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Many of the listed articles there don't really offer much, but a couple look promising. I'd be happy to withdraw this nomination if the article can be improved. If you point out some specific articles that you think will help establish notability for Saamana, I'd be happy to assist in placing them in the article. Thank you for making the extra effort here, Vanamonde93. Waggie (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• Keep A historically important, influential and notable publication. See [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Abecedare (talk) 06:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
• Keep Passes WP:GNG as there is coverage in sources like Indian Press Since 1955 and Identity, Politics and Violence: Shiv Sena in Retrospect. Andrew D. (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.