Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Herring Artists (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 01:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Red Herring Artists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article's time may finally be up; it was subject of a deletion discussion on 2005 which was inconclusive, with people promising to improve it. Not much improvement has taken place ...and I fully expect the notability criteria are more rigorous 8 years later! I can't see anything about the group online, there seems to be a claim of notability based on a verbal comment made at a conference, and notability by association based on a couple of members' achievements. Noen of these are convincing, fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.