Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razorba
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 13:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Razorba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
That the NYT gave it a mention as a curiosity is not evidence it belongs in an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Nearly all references are adverts. - Altenmann >t 16:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.