Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Odedra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Raju Odedra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Raju Odedra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability, fails WP:BIO. The nettv4u site is a wiki, not a reliable source; and there seem to be no indepth sources about him otherwise, just some passing mentions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

• Strongly keep: This article should not be deleted at all as it is about a writer of a famous national Hindi entertainment drama serial Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah and also nominated for a national award.Kitaab Ka Kida (talk)
  • Do you have some good sources for this? I note on our article for that show that he is one of 10 writers of that show. Google News only show some passing mentions[1], and Google only has 32 hits, so it seems as if very little has been written about him in sources I can access (note that sources I can't access are equally acceptable, but I can only judge his notability on what is available to me). Fram (talk) 10:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete none of the sources constitute significant coverage from reliable sources. Fails GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 04:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - he may be a writer, but the sourcing is terrible ad thus fails WP:ANYBIO. Bearian (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.