Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniblob
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. + severe WP:NPOV / borderline WP:G11 issues. slakr\ talk / 03:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Omniblob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability WP:BAND. Sources hugely fail WP:RS, in some cases failing to mention the band at all. PROD was removed. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The article does provide evidence of notability in the form of "chart success in a few countries outside the UK", however this is unreferenced. It should be tagged and if it proves to be true the the article meets BAND. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Walter, thanks for pointing that out. When I get a little time I will look for some sources on the charting. If it can be confirmed, I will withdraw the AfD. Best regards -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.