Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not cross bun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hot cross bun#Other versions. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Not cross bun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Not cross bun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article describes a relatively niche pastry that I don't believe meets the notability requirements. I do believe it could be merged with hot cross bun. Why? I Ask 17:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Article is likely a hoax. None of the sources mention the term and the image has nothing to with it. Kori (@) 18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• Its definitely not a hoax and both sources do mention it. The actual notability is certainly questionable, though. Rorshacma (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• It could be that it's a hoax article referencing other hoax articles. Make sure to check the reliability of the listed sources. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• Weak Redirect to Hot cross bun#Other versions - The coverage of the product is definitely not enough to show this variant of the buns being independently notable, and they are already covered in the main article. Quite honestly, I don't think these are notable enough to even be mentioned there - aside from the two articles currently being used in sources, the only other source I can find talking about the term is just a brief mention saying that the product was a failure and discontinued shortly after. But, as long as that information is there, using this as a redirect is about the best that can be done. Rorshacma (talk) 18:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

• Redirect/merge to Hot cross bun#Other versions - no independent notability, but could be a passing mention in that section (if the hoax concerns are found to be untrue, otherwise that's a straightforward delete). Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 18:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.