Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Marden
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 28bytes (talk) 15:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Melanie Marden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actress and model whose roles have all been minor supporting ones to date; article is sourced entirely to primary, unreliable (i.e. blogs) or trivial (i.e. the mere appearance of her name in a television or film directory) sources, with not a single valid source in the bunch. As always, she can have an article if one that makes a substantive claim of notability can be written and sourced to substantial coverage in reliable sources, but as written this version does not pass that test. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - subject's roles to date do not meet WP:ENT, and I'm unable to find significant coverage for her in reliable sources (WP:GNG). Gong show 06:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Too soon for this model/actress. She doesn't have the significant coverage in reliable sources that we require. Maybe later. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. She was one of the stars of the movie Pigs -- I'm not sure if that's enough to warrant her own Wikipedia entry, but I thought I'd mention it. Drpickem (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
added one more reference from IMDB but may not change oyur reviews. Thanks for your considerationJpop73 (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- IMDB does not count as a reliable source that demonstrates notability. Every person who's ever been involved in any film or television production at all, right down to "third assistant best boy's hairdresser", gets an IMDb page but that doesn't make them all notable enough to be on here. Bearcat (talk) 08:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.