Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Me llaman Lolita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 00:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me llaman Lolita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 21:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:25, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: this was a well known and popular telenovela in its day in Colombia. It won three awards (including Best Telenovela of the Year) from the Colombian edition of TVyNovelas, the country's major magazine about everything to do with soap operas, but perhaps more importantly, it also won an India Catalina Award – these awards for the best in Colombian television are presented by the organization behind Colombia's major international film festival, the Cartagena Film Festival, and are considered more respectable and prestigious (and the series may have won more awards, had it not been up against Yo soy Betty, la fea, the Colombian telenovela that was remade in the US as the hugely successful Ugly Betty). Me llaman Lolita also gained notoriety and accusations of pedophilia due to its storyline, leading to protests and censorship when it was screened in other Latin American countries. I realize information is going to be hard to come by on the internet about a TV program screened in 1999, but I've added the above information to the article, and hope this convinces editors that the article is worth keeping. Richard3120 (talk) 00:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Update: the series was well-remembered enough for the Colombian free morning newspaper Publimetro to publish a "where are they now?" article, in 2016 [1]. I believe all of the above shows that the article satisfies WP:GNG. Richard3120 (talk) 16:12, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy