Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madaline Zanni
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 18:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Madaline Zanni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deletion requested by subject at OTRS; non-notable - fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Davey2010 Talk 06:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seriously. The only sources are her personal website and her Facebook page. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as my default vote when someone of low or unclear notability requests deletion of their own bio. Wikipedia shouldn't cause article subjects undue grief. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and subject's wishes. Andrew Lenahan has put it perfectly. Mabalu (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:NMODEL. A quick Google search chucks up a load of self-published social media and I can't find any news sources that can be used to establish notability. Funny Pika! 17:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable - fails WP:GNG and WP:NMODEL. Sideways713 (talk) 15:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.