Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of advertising agencies by revenue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was rename to List of advertising agencies. There was no consensus to either rename or delete, but nobody expressed any interest in keeping the article under this title. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- List of advertising agencies by revenue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no source given for revenue, nor which year. the target article may have these numbers, may not. the list should be deleted, or renamed "list of advertising agencies" with revenue removed as unsourced. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- As there is no List of advertising agencies (that title just redirects to this one), your second suggestion seems to be the only way to go. Renaming and removing the revenue column could of course been done without AFD. Speedy close? postdlf (talk) 17:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:41, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just another laundry list. The agencies mentioned in this article could all be mentioned in the article Advertising agency, so I don't think it should be moved, merged or redirected. Epzik8 (talk) 15:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Moving this list into the main advertising agency article would actually be merging it. postdlf (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 02:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename as suggested above by Postdlf. The advertising revenue can still be in the chart, but the broader topic will allow other columns of data for further comparison. ThemFromSpace 23:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Information is timely, not encyclopedic, and the data would be better suited as a summarized description rather than a large table of information that will regularly require update and can be found by interested parties at other sources with better results. @SmithAndTeam (talk) 17:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.