Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coreen Davis Hampson
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article deleted by Athaenara per G7 (author request). (non-admin closure) Dps04 (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Coreen Davis Hampson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This individual is not notable. Fails WP:GNG. cookie monster (2020) 755 06:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some minimal discussion of why she is not notable would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Some minimal discussion of why she is not notable would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the general notability guideline. The fundament of the general notability guideline is that the subject should have 'received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject' and I’m not seeing that here. P.S. This is eligible for a CSD G7 speedy deletion is it not? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- CookieMonster755, you could have tagged this with CSD G7 as you want to have this deleted. In any case, delete as a GNG fail. JavaHurricane 05:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.