Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Jago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NAUTHOR was suggested but with only one RS review it seems she doesn't meet the bar. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Carol Jago

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Carol Jago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is her own website Rathfelder (talk) 12:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 12:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Accomplished professional, but not notable enough for an encyclopedia. Caro7200 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
• Keep as the editor above says she is an accomplished professional. She is a published author with a number of citations according to google scholar, she is also the recipient of a couple of literary awards. I think that taken togather there is enough for her to pass notability. AFD is not cleanup. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

There are millions of accomplished professionals in the world--you could be one yourself. She's authored many books, but I'm not finding a lot of coverage in reliable sources. It also appears that she may have edited her own article. Have you found any RS? Caro7200 (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• Delete the article lacks the 3rd party coverage of her existence that is needed to prove notability. Just having works published does not make one default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. Clearly a person doing good things for literacy but I can't find any secondary coverage from reliable sources. Tacyarg (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
• Comment. She's published at least 7 books with Heinemann (publisher), which would suggest WP:NAUTHOR is likely. I can only find one RS review, however [1]. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.