Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaten Track Brewery
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Beaten Track Brewery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP. Coverage is only local as per WP:AUD. Created by a single purpose editor so possible WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Didn't find anything to suggest that it's any more notable than any average one of the thousands of other small craft breweries in Australia. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 11:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. I could not find a single RS via a NewsBank database search (wider and deeper than Google) nor via Google. The single source on the page is good but not sufficient to meet notability guidelines. Cabrils (talk) 00:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Some breweries, even local ones, are notable; this is not one of them. BD2412 T 02:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.