Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldscape
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Baldscape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Originally PROD'd in 2016 with a rationale pointing out it was a neologism. DePROD'd with the rationale that it likely met GNG.
I would dispute this. In particular, WP:N demands that topics have gained attention across a period of time, ie, not merely for one weekend before dropping off into obscurity. Every single source in this article is from approximately May 13th, 2016, with no sources dating before or after found on a search, which tells us that this concept, while amusing as news site filler, is not actually encyclopedically notable. This is the definition of a concept that badly fails the ten year test - it would hardly pass a hypothetical ten day test. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 11:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as a flash-in-the-pan neologism. Like the nom, I was unable to find any sources that weren't from May 2016. I can't think of anywhere to merge this either. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 00:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.