Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As Cities Burn EP (2002)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. —Darkwind (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- As Cities Burn EP (2002) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- As Cities Burn EP (2003) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Stub articles on two EPs by the band As Cities Burn, which fail WP:NALBUM. Both articles are wholly unreferenced, and the band's article offers no sign of any significant coverage; the apparently long list of refs there includes links to myspace blogs, twitter and Facebook. There is no point in redirecting, because the disambiguated titles are not plausible search terms ... and since the material is wholly unreferenced, there is nothing to merge. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the second one to As Cities Burn - the tracklisting is easily verified. I couldn't confirm the details on the first one, but if it was actually a commercial release, I see no reason not to merge. --Michig (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete These EPs are non-notable. Without any significant coverage and little insignificant coverage, the information is pointless to merge. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.