User talk:Tvx1

Draft:2023 Poland Darts Masters

Hi Tvx1.

I see that the Draft:2023 Poland Darts Masters is still in the draft version. I have added an independent link to Sky Sports who covered the tournament.

Is this not enough to move it from a draft to an actual page? Other pages in that year's tournament such as;

• 2023 Bahrain Darts Masters
• 2023 Nordic Darts Masters
• 2023 US Darts Masters etc. all have pages?

Your help is much appreciated!

Edit warring

You are edit warring at Marchioness disaster. Breaking our rule will get you blocked. Please use the Talk Page and stop reverting. Graham Beards (talk) 20:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Why aren't you warning the other person as well? Edit warring isn't something one does alone. And putting the page under full protection was an uneccesary overreaction. We were already trying to resolve this on the talk page.Tvx1 22:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Noting that SchroCat also violated WP:3RR at the time, with the justification that they had started a discussion on the talk page (which is not a valid reason to break 3RR according to WP:3RRNO). Both users should have received warnings about edit warring and Graham has acknowledged this. The ANI thread has been closed with both editors basically told not to edit war and not to use inflammatory language. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:F1 driver results legend 4

Template:F1 driver results legend 4 has been nominated for merging with Template:F1 driver results legend 2. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:F1 driver results legend 7

Template:F1 driver results legend 7 has been nominated for merging with Template:F1 driver results legend 2. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.