User talk:B14709

Your submission at Articles for creation

Chamaeleo africanus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Graceful chameleon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lugia2453 (talk) 22:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of David Bosco at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Smooth chameleon was accepted

Smooth chameleon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

B14709 (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for David Bosco

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Malakia

Why have you reverted my last edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.110.9.18 (talk) 00:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps it would be good to have a look at the RfC on Talk:Malakia regarding an article that was/is supposed to be about the Greek word. Esoglou (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Motion Picture Association of America film rating system

In regards to your revert of my edit to the Language section of the article, exactly how was the article "better" before my edit? There have been many PG films with uses of the word "shit," a noted example being The Sandlot. Please review your revert and get back to me on why it is valid.

70.97.195.40 (talk) 00:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

• I made a mistake. I'm sorry. Feel free to restore your changes. B14709 (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, B14709. You have new messages at Piguy101's talk page.
Message added 01:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Piguy101 (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Accidental reintroduction of vandalism

Hello, you seem to have accidentally re-introduced vandalism in this edit. Please be more careful in the future. Graham87 01:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah. Thanks for notifying me, and for not getting angry. I guess I was way too hasty on that one. B14709 (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, B14709, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 06:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Tariq Chow article

Hello. Thank you for leaving me a message about my edits, but I believe the changes I made were in line with policies regarding WP:BLP and WP:NOTE as explained in the edit comment I left.

The links provided as sources do not mention hardly any of the content the article claims they cite, and as a result most of the information is unverified. Is it not policy to remove articles about living persons if they are not verified or notable? The BLP policy states that ALL un-cited info should be removed immediately, which I did, so I consider your revert to be incorrect and not taking these things into account. Please do correct me if I am wrong.

Here's the line in the BLP policy: Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.200.22.131 (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me of your rationale. I incorrectly assumed that you were removing content without good reason, but I now realize I was wrong. Feel free to revert my edit or delete the unsourced material. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia a better place, and for putting up with idiots like me. B14709 (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Good morning person. Whilst my previous edits may have appeared to be vandalism, it is aimed at the Scottish National Party; a poitical party that spreads so much blatant lies and, pardon my French, bollocks that their dark underbelly should be known to the whole world and it's occupants. The SNP are a bubble of propaganda and I will make it my duty to burst them. Before you wonder - No, I am not drunk. Much censored love, person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.172.103 (talk) 00:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Please see WP:NPOV --Lixxx235 (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. While you may find the SNP demagogic and deceitful, Wikipedia aims to be both neutral and inoffensive. Thanks for notifying me of your rationale. B14709 (talk) 22:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I can add whatever I want

I can add whatever material I damn like and I don't care what anyone thinks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.83.253.184 (talk) 00:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)You can add whatever you want, at risk of being blocked and reverted for not following WP:POLICY. Or you can conform to WP:POLICY and be a contributing member of Wikipedia. --Lixxx235 (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Krav Maga

K NatIsrael972 (talk) 01:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

University of Oregon page revisions

Appreciate the feedback about the edits.

My point in making them is to point out that the U of O's claims of being a "flagship" university are patently untrue, and that by any meaningful measure, that distinction belongs to Oregon STATE University. The fact that "flagship university" is boilerplate language on their press releases simply does not make it so. Hopefully that language will be edited from the original page, or at least noted as a disputed claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.25.123.137 (talk) 03:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about chiming in, but I did always think it was strange that OS and UO claimed flagship status. Besides: OS was first: but the VERY first was Western Oregon :D Corporatemonster (talk) 04:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining your edits. I reverted them not because I'm pro-UO or anti-OS, but because I thought that they were pushing a certain viewpoint (WP:NPOV). If you want to clear this up and discuss this on the talk page, that would be great. Again, thanks for responding! B14709 (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battery Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wolfen

Second Anglo-Mysore War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Haider Ali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Article refused for publication

Dear B14709 Thanks for the review of my article submitted last month. I'm not sure to clearly understand why the article was refused for publication. Could you please be more clear in your comments? See below the actual comments:

User:Dinignako/European registry and network for Intoxication type Metabolic DiseasesBold text

Submission declined on 11 May 2014 by B14709 (talk). This article is unstructured and does not effectively confirm the subject's notability. Declined by B14709 15 days ago. Last edited by B14709 15 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be rejected again.

Thanks again and hope to ear from you very soon. Dinignako — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinignako (talk • contribs) 15:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for asking me after I accidentally confused you! I responded with another comment on the submission's page, and hopefully I cleared up any uncertainties. If you have any questions, then just ask them here. Again, thanks for responding, and for creating the submission in the first place; it is editors like you who improve Wikipedia. B14709 (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Historical Changes to iXsystems (formerly known as BSDi)

Hey, thanks for keeping the peace! I meant no harm with my update. Just attempting to include the historical evolution of this company. It's been around since 1991, was acquired by FreeBSD Mall in 2002, and then FreeBSD Mall was acquired by OffMyServer (iXsystems) in 2003. With that kind of corporate hot-potato going on it's been super difficult to keep this page up to date. How should I proceed with these updates in the future? Including the most current and missing historical information about the company makes for a better and more accurate representation of reality. How should I proceed from here? I'm just trying to be a helpful citizen :)

Namesjixon (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Whoa, I don't know. iXsystems seems like a successor to BSD, so I think we should probably keep it as a separate section for now. Personally, I'm not very familiar with the company, so if you could help, that would be awesome! B14709 (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, okay... No worries. I'm here to help! So when a company gets acquired, the new company becomes the "Successor" and a new wiki article should be created? Sorry for the noob talk, still getting acquainted with my sea-legs.

The problem with creating a new article is that iXsystems currently redirects to BSDi - is there a way you can revert that?

best,

Namesjixon (talk) 01:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, via WP:CORP, a company is not notable if it does not have significant coverage from third-party sources. I Googled iXsystems, and the first twenty were either reviews or non-independent sources. For now, we should probably just keep it as a section of BSD. But if we do find more good sources, than iXsystems would definitely be a viable article. B14709 (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

And thanks for reminding me of the redirect. I'll improve it by linking it to the section! B14709 (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Awesome! You may find more more notable sources by Googling for "FreeNAS" and "PC-BSD" both of which are iXsystems sponsored open source projects. FreeNAS in particular seems to be a very well-known and established project in the realm of Network Attached Storage. PC-BSD, while not as well known, is another long-running open source project independently operated by Kris Moore of the FreeBSD community. Namesjixon (talk) 01:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. If you want to create a submission to Articles for Creation, then feel free to do so. It would be much appreciated. B14709 (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

JFRD Article

Thank you for reviewing the suggested additions to the article. The added work was removed by someone for copyright violation. I'm still trying to figure out what can and can't be added. Because the vast majority of the information is coming from the city's site. I'm not a seasoned editor, but would like to develop the JFRD article. However, I don't know what permission is needed to use that information. I have verbal consent, do I need written consent as well? Kendrick528 (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

@Kendrick528: Thanks for asking! Unfortunately, I can't answer your question very well. I declined the article because it already existed, not because of anything else. I probably don't know any more than you do in terms of copyright violations than you do. However, I'd suggest reading WP:CV for more information. Thanks, and have a good day! B14709 (talk) 17:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Doneţk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doneţk. Since you had some involvement with the Doneţk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 23:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bizarre-nosed chameleon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malagasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 02:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello B14709. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Al-Qaryatayn

I beg your pardon, but the only thing I did was to add the word "partial", as I am not one for vandalizing Wikipedia. I know it is hard to believe, but someone else was sitting beside me and added the insult. My apologies. LlegóelBigotee (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

OK. Sorry if you weren't the one to blame. This has happened to me before too; it's all you can do to try to prevent the edit from going through and, if that fails, then reverting the edit as quickly as possible. I suppose it's not really a big deal in the long run. Have a nice day! B14709 (talk) 00:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Stalin Quotes? Why do you feel that Quote from Stalin shouldn't be in the article of democide? There are scholarly articles, colleges, journals, webpages, and books stating that Stalin said that quote along with a lot more.Zielinski Auto Parts (talk) 05:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello, I'm Stevietheman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Federalist Party have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 11:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, B14709. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for fixing the Nazar page Mohevian (talk) 01:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, B14709. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, B14709. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cumberland Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Los Mirlos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Los Mirlos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Mirlos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Htanaungg (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Piruzān" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Piruzān has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § Piruzān until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)