Template:Did you know nominations/Dunning–Kruger effect
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dunning–Kruger effect
- ... that "the first rule of the Dunning–Kruger club is you don't know you're in the Dunning-Kruger club"? Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that the metacognitive explanation of the Dunning–Kruger effect states that low performers overestimate their skills because they are unable to recognize their incompetence? Source: [2][3]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1948 Cotton Bowl Classic
- Comment: ALT0 would a candidate for the quirky hook. If it does not work, ALT1 is the regular alternative.
References
- ^ Howard 2018, p. 354.
- ^ Dunning 2011, pp. 260–261.
- ^ Duignan 2023.
Sources
- Duignan, Brian (2023). "Dunning–Kruger effect". www.britannica.com. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
- Dunning, David (1 January 2011). "Chapter Five – The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 44. Academic Press. pp. 247–296. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6. ISBN 9780123855220. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
- Howard, Jonathan (28 November 2018). Cognitive Errors and Diagnostic Mistakes: A Case-Based Guide to Critical Thinking in Medicine. Springer. p. 354. ISBN 978-3-319-93224-8.
Improved to Good Article status by Phlsph7 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dunning–Kruger effect; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Yes, only significant matches are from Wikipedia mirrors and quotes.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Epicgenius (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: There is currently a discussion on the talkpage about whether the line from ALT0 should be included in the article. If it is removed then we would not able to use ALT0 and we would need to default to ALT1. I suggest that we put the nomination on hold until this issue is resolved. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- It was a clever hook (ALT0) but it is not apparent in the article so I will promote ALT1. But ALT1 checks out and is interesting and verifiable. I see Earwig alerts to a direct copy of our article. Lightburst (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)