Talk:Thebe (moon)

Discovery

So was this discoverd by S synnot or voyager1?

Voyager did take the photo, but it was the human who noted that what the photo showed was a moon. andy

Jupiter's four first discovered moons were Io, Ganymede, Europa, and Callisto. Thebe could hardly be fourth. And I had thought that Thebe was a moon of Saturn...although I could be wrong on that point.

Fourth means not by discovery date, but by distance from the planet. Seems like the article needs a little clarification on this point. (Done) andy

adj.

The name is just the Greek form of 'Thebes' (Homeric poetic form of Thêbai), so the standard Latin adjectival form Theban is appropriate. kwami 2005 June 30 00:07 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thebe (moon)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Initial comments Nergaal (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

• is the fourth of Jupiter's known moons (by distance from the planet). => by distance..., it is the fourth of the known moons (now it might be confusing to weather it is the 4th discovered one)
• Ring, which is f => I would use that instead of which
• Amalthea is the largest of the inner satellites of Jupiter. => ??? where does this fit in? I think it should say that Theme is the second of the inner ones, after Amalthea
• Its surface features include large craters and high mountains => how large/high? relative to its size?
• Thebe was photographed in 1979 and 1980 by the Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft, and later, in more detail, by the Galileo orbiter in the 1990s => the voyager 1 part has allready been said. rephrase like: after v1, it was also visited by....
• merge discovery and exploration since they are both stubs
• hich is composed of the dust ejected from the satellite => since you specify this, you should also explain why it is on the edge and say, not in the middle or on the inner edge?
• ref 1 is confusing
• refs 6 and 8 lack publishers and accessdates
• added a few s

Otherwise it looks good and is comprehensive enough. A little workup and this can go to be a GA easily. Nergaal (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I think that I fixed the article. Ruslik (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

passing Nergaal (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)