Talk:ILike
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Speedy Deletion
[edit]This page has been sited as spam for no reason. It is a music website where you can meet people that share the same tastes as you, suggest music, and legally download music. Its a popular website and gaining users each day. It is also on facebook as one of the top applications used by its users. Speedy Deletion is not what the page needs, it needs more information which is added as time goes on. Shotmenot 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- It would help to have secondary sources that demonstrate the notability of the website. This would also make it easier to give an encyclopedic treatment of the website rather than just a description of its functionality. -SpuriousQ (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- To help keep the validity of the wiki entry and to add to its information, I have added some sources. I will also add information soon to expand the article into a larger one with more information and give it a view importance. Shotmenot 16:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
sounds like an ad......
Sounds indeed like an ad 83.227.51.172 (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
After trying to give a more complete overview of what the site entails (my original discussion suggested it sounded like an ad campaign, but I quickly removed it) the broader view was suggested as being not acceptable. All I suggested was that one has to be careful about taking Songs/Artists combinations as being accurate. Wpreston (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Numbers
[edit]The numbers with dates need to stop being added. They will just keep changing and grow less of a fact and more of an annoying matter with each one. Shotmenot 21:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]Just added bias citation to the section entitled "A Warning". This section is clearly biased and does not reflect Wikipedia's standards of neutrality or the general attitudes toward iLike. I personally don't think it's necessary at all to the article. CailinH (talk) 02:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
For an encyclopedia, its crap writing, but there should be something (withing the wikipedia standards) to replace it...--68.53.133.217 (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
As if you can write? Look at your own writing.
^agreed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.116.32.171 (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I removed it. It wasn't neutral or encyclopedic in the slightest. TheÐarkCrusader (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The original article was not 'neutral or encyclopedic in the slightest', it was an ad as someone else pointed out. At least the whole article is neutral now.
Hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.9.79 (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Defunct
[edit]iLike has officially been shut down and the article should reflect that the site no longer exists. --Nickvet419 (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://blog.ilike.com/ilike_press_releases/2007/10/billboard-and-i.html
- Triggered by
\bilike\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
- http://blog.ilike.com/ilike_team_blog/2009/08/breaking-news-ilike-joins-forces-with-myspace-sells-music-in-page.html
- Triggered by
\bilike\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
- http://www.ilike.com
- Triggered by
\bilike\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
- http://www.ilike.com/about/
- Triggered by
\bilike\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Start-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles