Jump to content

Nonlinear Dirac equation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See Ricci calculus and Van der Waerden notation for the notation.

In quantum field theory, the nonlinear Dirac equation is a model of self-interacting Dirac fermions. This model is widely considered in quantum physics as a toy model of self-interacting electrons.[1][2][3][4][5]

The nonlinear Dirac equation appears in the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity, which extends general relativity to matter with intrinsic angular momentum (spin).[6][7] This theory removes a constraint of the symmetry of the affine connection and treats its antisymmetric part, the torsion tensor, as a variable in varying the action. In the resulting field equations, the torsion tensor is a homogeneous, linear function of the spin tensor. The minimal coupling between torsion and Dirac spinors thus generates an axial-axial, spin–spin interaction in fermionic matter, which becomes significant only at extremely high densities. Consequently, the Dirac equation becomes nonlinear (cubic) in the spinor field,[8][9] which causes fermions to be spatially extended and may remove the ultraviolet divergence in quantum field theory.[10]

Models

[edit]

Two common examples are the massive Thirring model and the Soler model.

Thirring model

[edit]

The Thirring model[11] was originally formulated as a model in (1 + 1) space-time dimensions and is characterized by the Lagrangian density

where ψC2 is the spinor field, ψ = ψ*γ0 is the Dirac adjoint spinor,

(Feynman slash notation is used), g is the coupling constant, m is the mass, and γμ are the two-dimensional gamma matrices, finally μ = 0, 1 is an index.

Soler model

[edit]

The Soler model[12] was originally formulated in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions. It is characterized by the Lagrangian density

using the same notations above, except

is now the four-gradient operator contracted with the four-dimensional Dirac gamma matrices γμ, so therein μ = 0, 1, 2, 3.

Other models

[edit]

Besides the Soler model, extensive work has been done where nonlinear versions of Dirac’s equation are used to describe purely classical, nonlinear particle-like solutions (PLS) in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions. Rañada has given a review of the subject.[13] Although a more recent review specifically devoted to purely classical, nonlinear PLS has apparently not appeared, pertinent references are available in various more recent publications.[14][15]

The models reviewed by Rañada are meant to be entirely classical in nature and should properly be regarded as having nothing to do with quantum mechanics, but the dependent variable in the Dirac equation is still typically taken as a spinor. When a purely classical model of this nature is to be considered, the use of a spinor as the dependent variable seems inappropriate.

If a minor modification of the underlying Dirac equation is used, the problem can be avoided in a relatively straightforward way.[16] Instead of using the usual column vector as the dependent variable in Dirac’s equation, one can use a 4 × 4 matrix. When there is no transformation of coordinates, the leftmost column of the matrix is used in Dirac’s equation in the usual manner, but when there is to be a transformation in space-time, the four components of the dependent variable are sometimes allowed to appear in various different positions in the 4 × 4 matrix.

The result can be understood in terms of a Clifford algebra since the dependent variable in Dirac’s equation can be represented as a 4 dimensional left ideal of a Clifford algebra. In this case one simply allows the dependent variable to lie in a different left ideal when there is a transformation in space-time.

Einstein–Cartan theory

[edit]

In Einstein–Cartan theory the Lagrangian density for a Dirac spinor field is given by ()

where

is the Fock–Ivanenko covariant derivative of a spinor with respect to the affine connection, is the spin connection, is the determinant of the metric tensor , and the Dirac matrices satisfy

The Einstein–Cartan field equations for the spin connection yield an algebraic constraint between the spin connection and the spinor field rather than a partial differential equation, which allows the spin connection to be explicitly eliminated from the theory. The final result is a nonlinear Dirac equation containing an effective "spin-spin" self-interaction,

where is the general-relativistic covariant derivative of a spinor, and is the Einstein gravitational constant, . The cubic term in this equation becomes significant at densities on the order of .

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Д.Д. Иваненко (1938). "Замечание к теории взаимодействия через частицы" [translated in: D.D. Ivanenko, Notes to the theory of interaction via particles, Sov. Phys. JETP 13 (1938), 141)] (PDF). ЖЭТФ. 8: 260–266.
  2. ^ R. Finkelstein; R. LeLevier & M. Ruderman (1951). "Nonlinear spinor fields". Phys. Rev. 83 (2): 326–332. Bibcode:1951PhRv...83..326F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.83.326.
  3. ^ R. Finkelstein; C. Fronsdal & P. Kaus (1956). "Nonlinear Spinor Field". Phys. Rev. 103 (5): 1571–1579. Bibcode:1956PhRv..103.1571F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.103.1571.
  4. ^ W. Heisenberg (1957). "Quantum Theory of Fields and Elementary Particles". Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (3): 269–278. Bibcode:1957RvMP...29..269H. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.269.
  5. ^ Gross, David J. and Neveu, André (1974). "Dynamical symmetry breaking in asymptotically free field theories". Phys. Rev. D. 10 (10): 3235–3253. Bibcode:1974PhRvD..10.3235G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.3235.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Dennis W. Sciama, "The physical structure of general relativity". Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 463-469 (1964).
  7. ^ Tom W. B. Kibble, "Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field". J. Math. Phys. 2, 212-221 (1961).
  8. ^ F. W. Hehl & B. K. Datta (1971). "Nonlinear spinor equation and asymmetric connection in general relativity". J. Math. Phys. 12 (7): 1334–1339. Bibcode:1971JMP....12.1334H. doi:10.1063/1.1665738.
  9. ^ Friedrich W. Hehl; Paul von der Heyde; G. David Kerlick & James M. Nester (1976). "General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects". Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 (3): 393–416. Bibcode:1976RvMP...48..393H. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.48.393.
  10. ^ Nikodem J. Popławski (2010). "Nonsingular Dirac particles in spacetime with torsion". Phys. Lett. B. 690 (1): 73–77. arXiv:0910.1181. Bibcode:2010PhLB..690...73P. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.04.073.
  11. ^ Walter Thirring (1958). "A soluble relativistic field theory". Annals of Physics. 3 (1): 91–112. Bibcode:1958AnPhy...3...91T. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(58)90015-0.
  12. ^ Mario Soler (1970). "Classical, Stable, Nonlinear Spinor Field with Positive Rest Energy". Phys. Rev. D. 1 (10): 2766–2769. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...1.2766S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2766.
  13. ^ Rañada, A.F. (1983). "Classical nonlinear Dirac field models of extended particles". Quantum Theory, Groups, Fields and Particles. Amsterdam: Reidel. pp. 271–291. ISBN 1-4020-0324-2.
  14. ^ Esteban, M.J.; Lewin, M.; Séré, E. (2008). "Variational methods in relativistic quantum mechanics". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.). 45 (4): 535–593. arXiv:0706.3309. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-08-01212-3. S2CID 1686536.
  15. ^ Dudnikova, T.V. (2020). "Virial identities and energy-momentum relation for solitary waves of nonlinear Dirac equations". Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics. 41 (6): 956–981. doi:10.1134/S1995080220060074. S2CID 226199105.
  16. ^ Luke, J.C. (May 2022). "A Note on the Use of the Nonlinear Dirac Equation for Soliton Particle Models". ScholarWorks.IUPUI.edu. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy