 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editwas 100% plagiarism from Kodansha !!!
- Do not blank the article. Rather, explain here what is the problem. GregorB 02:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
as I wrote, the problem is that it's 100% (ok, 99%) plagiarism from Kodansha and if you check Wikipedia's policy : "an article is using copyrighted content withouth permission" "solution :[...] you can remove the content yourself!"
Britannica
editThese references to the Britannica are beyond useless. You can't regurgitate what you see on that site and then use it as a citation especially since that site has zero citations. As it is, it amounts to little more than pure speculation to refer to Tadayoshi as the true architect of Takauji's successes. Frankly I expect better than this.
Portrait?
editI have seen this portrait in several reliable books that claim it portrays Yoritomo. I don't disagree that theories about it representing Tadayoshi exist and are gaining ground, but the source cited is bogus. The link (Weapons & Fighting Techniques Of The Samurai Warrior 1200-1877 AD accessed on June 24, 2009) is to a book review on a blog, but claims to be to the actual book. Can someone who has actually read the book post a more encyclopedic reference for this? elvenscout742 (talk) 13:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Weapons & Fighting Techniques isn't the reference needed, what's needed is the art historian Michio Yonekura's 源頼朝像 沈黙の肖像画.
- I'm unsure if the Yoritomo/Tadayoshi image should be used in this article. The work remains registered as the "Alleged Portrait of Yoritomo" (伝源頼朝像), not the "Alleged Portrait of Tadayoshi". It's also not used in the Japanese-language article. Prburley (talk) 14:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)