In mathematics, a Grothendieck category is a certain kind of abelian category, introduced in Alexander Grothendieck's Tôhoku paper of 1957[1] in order to develop the machinery of homological algebra for modules and for sheaves in a unified manner. The theory of these categories was further developed in Pierre Gabriel's 1962 thesis.[2]

To every algebraic variety one can associate a Grothendieck category , consisting of the quasi-coherent sheaves on . This category encodes all the relevant geometric information about , and can be recovered from (the Gabriel–Rosenberg reconstruction theorem). This example gives rise to one approach to noncommutative algebraic geometry: the study of "non-commutative varieties" is then nothing but the study of (certain) Grothendieck categories.[3]

Definition

edit

By definition, a Grothendieck category   is an AB5 category with a generator. Spelled out, this means that

  •   is an abelian category;
  • every (possibly infinite) family of objects in   has a coproduct (also known as direct sum) in  ;
  • direct limits of short exact sequences are exact; this means that if a direct system of short exact sequences in   is given, then the induced sequence of direct limits is a short exact sequence as well. (Direct limits are always right-exact; the important point here is that we require them to be left-exact as well.)
  •   possesses a generator, i.e. there is an object   in   such that   is a faithful functor from   to the category of sets. (In our situation, this is equivalent to saying that every object   of   admits an epimorphism  , where   denotes a direct sum of copies of  , one for each element of the (possibly infinite) set  .)

The name "Grothendieck category" appeared neither in Grothendieck's Tôhoku paper[1] nor in Gabriel's thesis;[2] it came into use in the second half of the 1960s in the work of several authors, including Jan-Erik Roos, Bo Stenström, Ulrich Oberst, and Bodo Pareigis. (Some authors use a different definition, not requiring the existence of a generator.)

Examples

edit
  • The prototypical example of a Grothendieck category is the category of abelian groups; the abelian group   of integers is a generator.
  • More generally, given any ring   (associative, with  , but not necessarily commutative), the category   of all right (or alternatively: left) modules over   is a Grothendieck category;   itself is a generator.
  • Given a topological space  , the category of all sheaves of abelian groups on   is a Grothendieck category.[1] (More generally: the category of all sheaves of right  -modules on   is a Grothendieck category for any ring  .)
  • Given a ringed space  , the category of sheaves of OX-modules is a Grothendieck category.[1]
  • Given an (affine or projective) algebraic variety   (or more generally: any scheme or algebraic stack), the category   of quasi-coherent sheaves on   is a Grothendieck category.[4]
  • Given a small site (C, J) (i.e. a small category C together with a Grothendieck topology J), the category of all sheaves of abelian groups on the site is a Grothendieck category.

Constructing further Grothendieck categories

edit
  • Any category that's equivalent to a Grothendieck category is itself a Grothendieck category.
  • Given Grothendieck categories  , the product category   is a Grothendieck category.
  • Given a small category   and a Grothendieck category  , the functor category  , consisting of all covariant functors from   to  , is a Grothendieck category.[1]
  • Given a small preadditive category   and a Grothendieck category  , the functor category   of all additive covariant functors from   to   is a Grothendieck category.[5]
  • If   is a Grothendieck category and   is a localizing subcategory of  , then both   and the Serre quotient category   are Grothendieck categories.[2]

Properties and theorems

edit

Every Grothendieck category contains an injective cogenerator. For example, an injective cogenerator of the category of abelian groups is the quotient group  .

Every object in a Grothendieck category   has an injective hull in  .[1][2] This allows to construct injective resolutions and thereby the use of the tools of homological algebra in  , in order to define derived functors. (Note that not all Grothendieck categories allow projective resolutions for all objects; examples are categories of sheaves of abelian groups on many topological spaces, such as on the space of real numbers.)

In a Grothendieck category, any family of subobjects   of a given object   has a supremum (or "sum")   as well as an infimum (or "intersection")  , both of which are again subobjects of  . Further, if the family   is directed (i.e. for any two objects in the family, there is a third object in the family that contains the two), and   is another subobject of  , we have[6]

 

Grothendieck categories are well-powered (sometimes called locally small, although that term is also used for a different concept), i.e. the collection of subobjects of any given object forms a set (rather than a proper class).[5]

It is a rather deep result that every Grothendieck category   is complete,[7] i.e. that arbitrary limits (and in particular products) exist in  . By contrast, it follows directly from the definition that   is co-complete, i.e. that arbitrary colimits and coproducts (direct sums) exist in  . Coproducts in a Grothendieck category are exact (i.e. the coproduct of a family of short exact sequences is again a short exact sequence), but products need not be exact.

A functor   from a Grothendieck category   to an arbitrary category   has a left adjoint if and only if it commutes with all limits, and it has a right adjoint if and only if it commutes with all colimits. This follows from Peter J. Freyd's special adjoint functor theorem and its dual.[8]

The Gabriel–Popescu theorem states that any Grothendieck category   is equivalent to a full subcategory of the category   of right modules over some unital ring   (which can be taken to be the endomorphism ring of a generator of  ), and   can be obtained as a Gabriel quotient of   by some localizing subcategory.[9]

As a consequence of Gabriel–Popescu, one can show that every Grothendieck category is locally presentable.[10] Furthermore, Gabriel-Popescu can be used to see that every Grothendieck category is complete, being a reflective subcategory of the complete category   for some  .

Every small abelian category   can be embedded in a Grothendieck category, in the following fashion. The category   of left-exact additive (covariant) functors   (where   denotes the category of abelian groups) is a Grothendieck category, and the functor  , with  , is full, faithful and exact. A generator of   is given by the coproduct of all  , with  .[2] The category   is equivalent to the category   of ind-objects of   and the embedding   corresponds to the natural embedding  . We may therefore view   as the co-completion of  .

Special kinds of objects and Grothendieck categories

edit

An object   in a Grothendieck category is called finitely generated if, whenever   is written as the sum of a family of subobjects of  , then it is already the sum of a finite subfamily. (In the case   of module categories, this notion is equivalent to the familiar notion of finitely generated modules.) Epimorphic images of finitely generated objects are again finitely generated. If   and both   and   are finitely generated, then so is  . The object   is finitely generated if, and only if, for any directed system   in   in which each morphism is a monomorphism, the natural morphism   is an isomorphism.[11] A Grothendieck category need not contain any non-zero finitely generated objects.

A Grothendieck category is called locally finitely generated if it has a set of finitely generated generators (i.e. if there exists a family   of finitely generated objects such that to every object   there exist   and a non-zero morphism  ; equivalently:   is epimorphic image of a direct sum of copies of the  ). In such a category, every object is the sum of its finitely generated subobjects.[5] Every category   is locally finitely generated.

An object   in a Grothendieck category is called finitely presented if it is finitely generated and if every epimorphism   with finitely generated domain   has a finitely generated kernel. Again, this generalizes the notion of finitely presented modules. If   and both   and   are finitely presented, then so is  . In a locally finitely generated Grothendieck category  , the finitely presented objects can be characterized as follows:[12]   in   is finitely presented if, and only if, for every directed system   in  , the natural morphism   is an isomorphism.

An object   in a Grothendieck category   is called coherent if it is finitely presented and if each of its finitely generated subobjects is also finitely presented.[13] (This generalizes the notion of coherent sheaves on a ringed space.) The full subcategory of all coherent objects in   is abelian and the inclusion functor is exact.[13]

An object   in a Grothendieck category is called Noetherian if the set of its subobjects satisfies the ascending chain condition, i.e. if every sequence   of subobjects of   eventually becomes stationary. This is the case if and only if every subobject of X is finitely generated. (In the case  , this notion is equivalent to the familiar notion of Noetherian modules.) A Grothendieck category is called locally Noetherian if it has a set of Noetherian generators; an example is the category of left modules over a left-Noetherian ring.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e f Grothendieck, Alexander (1957), "Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique", Tôhoku Mathematical Journal, (2), 9 (2): 119–221, doi:10.2748/tmj/1178244839, MR 0102537. English translation.
  2. ^ a b c d e Gabriel, Pierre (1962), "Des catégories abéliennes" (PDF), Bull. Soc. Math. Fr., 90: 323–448, doi:10.24033/bsmf.1583
  3. ^ Van, Hoang Dinh; Liu, Liyu; Lowen, Wendy (2016), "Non-commutative deformations and quasi-coherent modules", Selecta Mathematica, 23: 1061–1119, arXiv:1411.0331, doi:10.1007/s00029-016-0263-9, MR 3624905
  4. ^ Stacks Project, Tag 077P; Stacks Project, Tag 0781.
  5. ^ a b c Faith, Carl (1973). Algebra: Rings, Modules and Categories I. Springer. pp. 486–498. ISBN 9783642806346.
  6. ^ Stenström, Prop. V.1.1
  7. ^ Stenström, Cor. X.4.4
  8. ^ Mac Lane, Saunders (1978). Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd edition. Springer. p. 130.
  9. ^ Popescu, Nicolae; Gabriel, Pierre (1964). "Caractérisation des catégories abéliennes avec générateurs et limites inductives exactes". Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. 258: 4188–4190.
  10. ^ Šťovíček, Jan (2013-01-01). "Deconstructibility and the Hill Lemma in Grothendieck categories". Forum Mathematicum. 25 (1). arXiv:1005.3251. Bibcode:2010arXiv1005.3251S. doi:10.1515/FORM.2011.113. S2CID 119129714.
  11. ^ Stenström, Prop. V.3.2
  12. ^ Stenström, Prop. V.3.4
  13. ^ a b Herzog, I. (1997). "The Ziegler Spectrum of a Locally Coherent Grothendieck Category". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. 74 (3): 503–558. doi:10.1112/S002461159700018X. S2CID 121827768.

References

edit
edit
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy