Archives of older messages from my talkpage

The first ever message

Hi Túrelio; may I ask your souce for poisonous plants? You added that category to Thuja plicata and I was not able to verify that information. Best wishes, Wsiegmund 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wsiegmund, my primary source was this website: [1] (search for: Lebensbaum). While this site may not be of the highest standard, I assumed toxicity for T. plicata because the other species T. orientalis and T. occidentalis are without doubt toxic, were even used for abortions in former times.[2], [3], [4]. Sorry, but all pages are in German; but with your name you might have German ancestry ;-) . Well, after your hint, I looked for T. plicata in the USDA database and found "toxicity none". So if you prefer to remove the cat, that's fully okay for me. Thanks for your attention. --Túrelio 21:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio; thank you for your kind reply. It is a common species in my area and Pojar and McKinnon said that its wood was used for drying fish by our indigenous peoples. I removed the cat. It is generous of you to think that I might know German, but while I can read a little French and Spanish, I never studied German. But it is true that my great grandparents' first language was German. Best wishes on adding the poisonous plant categories to the species pages. It sounds like a worthwhile project. --Wsiegmund 21:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

from 2007

see: User talk:Túrelio/Archive2

from 2008

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive3

from 2009

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive4

from 2010

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive5

from 2011

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive6

from 2012

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive7

from 2013

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive8

from 2014

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive9

from 2015

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive10

from 2016

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive11

from 2017

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive12

from 2018

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive13

from 2019

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive14

from 2020

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive15

from 2021

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive16

from 2022

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive17

from 2023

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive18

from 2024

Kenkichi Tomimoto

"Kenkichi Tomimoto and unknown.jpg" and "Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shin'ichi Sasagawa.jpg" were very better without the dates: those are sufficient in the summary for the files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirogane10 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Can you delete also "Kenkichi Tomimoto (left) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg", "Kenkichi Tomimoto (right) with unknown, circa 1917.jpg", and "Kenkichi Tomimoto and Shinichi Sasagawa, circa 1917-1918.jpg"? Shirogane10 (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gugerell

Hallo Turelio, kannst du bitte bei User:Gugerell auch den Baustein wie bei User:Manfred Kuzel ergänzen, sonst sieht man auf seiner Seite nicht, dass er leider nimmer ist. danke lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 13:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

danke -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 15:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absent for 1 week

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tous mes voeux pour cette nouvelle année, Túrelio !
―Tisourcier

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for your continued efforts in cleaning up Copyright infringements. 0x0a (talk) 05:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How does copyright on photos of a city/buildings work?

Two photos that I took of the Chicago skyline from the Willis Tower observation deck were taken down by you because someone sent a report with links to articles from several years ago featuring different copyrighted and non-copyrighted images of the same buildings which look to be taken from the same observation deck with the same angle/focal length. The photos show the same buildings, but they were very clearly taken in different seasons and in different years (with new buildings in the photos I took not appearing in the other ones). In other words, it is very evident (to human eyes?) that they are not the same photos.

Is this alone enough to be considered a copyright violation? I see city pictures all over Wikipedia and after reading the basic FAQ's I assumed there would be no problem, especially given that thousands of people visit that observation deck every day and take basically the same photos. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:East_Randolph_Street,_Chicago_November_2023.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Northern_Chicago_Skyscrapers_November_2023.jpg Ee100duna (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, seems I overlooked the differences between the uploaded and the external images. Now restored. However, you credited "Robert Barthell" for both images, as you did for 2 other uploads. If that is your real name and if you don't bother it to be disclosed, it might be good (recommended) to put it also on your userpage. Otherwise, patrolers may assume that you uploaded Mr. Robert Barthell's images, but that you are a different person. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had already determined they should be kept

Hi. It isn't helpful when an admin makes a decision to keep an empty category allowed within the criteria, then when the user reverts an admin, the next admin just comes along and deletes the category. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. However, as the deletion seemed to be uncontroversial to me (C2), I hadn't checked the edit-history. By the way, it's still speedy-tagged now. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled redirect

Hi Túrelio,
Is it possible to have [this redirect] deleted ?
It's just been created but I omissed "file:" at the beginning of the file name… --Kontributor 2K (talk) 18:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armoirie imaginaire de Charlemagne.

Hi @Túrelio, i send you his message in order to know where you have seen the picture of Blason aigle fleurs de lys.png on this site ː https://wappenwiki.org/index.php/Main_Page because i didn't see it... I therefore consider that there is no violation of rights. Can you explain your point of view to me please. Yours sincerely. ̴̴ Cjldx (talk) 06:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the file hadn't been tagged by me, but by another user. However, the link to the hit is https://wappenwiki.org/index.php?title=File:Charlemagne.svg . --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your answer and the link. It's a free interpretation that inspired the original model, not quite a pure and simple copy. What do you think about ? Is it really a Copyright violation ? ON the site the licence is "CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Deed". I don't really know the term of these licence. Would you want, to explain me, please ? ̴̴ Cjldx (talk) 08:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, formally per our policy COM:L we only accept freely-licensed works. NC is a restriction (no commercial use) of the CC-license, which is not allowed on Commons (if it's the only license). Now, whether this coat-of-arms is indeed to be considered an original work of art which is still in copyright might be a matter of debate. To proof otherwise would require quite some substantial research. If you want to do that, I could put the file into a regular deletion-discussion, which allows a debate. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 January 2023: deleted page File:Οι εκτοπίσεις των Εβραίων από την Ελλάδα.jpg, Copyright violation

@Túrelio

Hello, In January 2023 (below the information), you removed a map that I integrated into a historical article on wikipedia. I am the author of this map and I indicate the sources of my book. My publisher is also aware that I am going to include this map. I don't understand why it was removed. Can it be reintroduced? Thank you for your help.

Ηere the informations: 16:39, 27 January 2023 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:Οι εκτοπίσεις των Εβραίων από την Ελλάδα.jpg (Copyright violation: The file's description mentions as souce "from Anastasios Karambaba's book In the footsteps of the Jews of Greece (Psychogios Publications, 2022). Design: Anastasios Karambabas, Romuald Cardinal, Adelaïde Naxos-Allalou". It is unlikely that the uploader is connecter in some way with the creators.) (thank) (global usage; delinker log) Anastasios Karababas (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anastasios Karababas ,

said file had be uploaded to Commons in 2022 by User:IstoriaGnwsH and had been tagged as copyvio-suspicious nearly 1 year ago by another Greek user, who had provided the above cited deletion-rationale, which credits the map to Anastasios Karambabas. Your account-name is Anastasios Karababas, which is similar to the first one, but not identical. Anyway, in the web said book is credited to Anastasios Karababas. So, you could either upload the image by yourself or send a confirmation for the free license of the upload by IstoriaGnwsH to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The latter is our dedault path for images uploaded by a user who is not the author. --Túrelio (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multipage files for transcription on wikisource

Hello Túrelio, before deleting or moving files used on an index page (like this action), please consider asking the uploader which file to keep. Index pages dont work with redirects. Regards --Mapmarks (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, shall File:Die Zurückkunft des Durchlauchtigsten Fürsten und Herrn Herr Friedrichs des Zweyten.pdf be restored? --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I’m not sure if this would work. But instead if you have admin rights, please move the duplicate file to this name, as I suggested today. Thanks --Mapmarks (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg

Can you delete "Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" as its bad duplicate? Thank you. --Nanafuji (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't already deleted "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the tagged redirect. The present file is not tagged as duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since "File:Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg" is actually protected, can you tagged it as "duplicate"? Nanafuji (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "File:"Yamamoto Heikichi.jpg": "Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8): File:Yamamoto Heikichi (1913).jpg". Nanafuji (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi, can you delete this image please: File:Lezmond-Mitchell.png

It is not the person in question, it is someone else called Tom Begaye, see these sources: [5], [6], [7]

Thanks Inexpiable (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Could you please delete my uploads from today? I wanted to upload 50 audios, but unfortunately, they got uploaded with wrong names. The upload wizard added a digit after the first item and then incrementally added to all following items. Once you've deleted these, I can reupload them with correct names. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 16:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 17:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to bother you, I messed up again. Same problem, but this time I stopped the soon enough, so there are just a handful of files to delete. Could you remove the uploads from yesterday again? I will then reupload them one by one instead of using Wizard and trying to upload many files at the same time. That way I can make sure the naming isn't messed up. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping keep Wikimedia Commons "spam-free". You are one of the few admins I hugely admire. Please enjoy with this e-kitten.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 09:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello, I want to report this file where is a picture of me with my name, surname and place where I am from. The picture was posted by my friend for a joke on the page about my place. Since some admin from Serbia deleted all nonsense he wrote on the page when I reported, I thought that was all, but today I saw my picture. I asked the same admin to delete the picture as well, but he told me to contact you because this is on Commons.I would really appreciate it if you could delete it, thanks a lot. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aleksa_Micic_The_Frog_of_the_village_Doljevac.jpg#filehistory 93.87.220.11 10:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi. This image has been uploaded as being in the public domain but it is not: File:Kenneth Smith criminal.jpg

It is from the Alabama Department of Corrections. Please delete.

Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello sir! I would like to report this picture: File:Аслан Абакаров.jpg Ricco Baroni (talk) 07:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. An admin-colleague has it already tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Túrelio

Can you delete the https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Amrita-vishwa-vidyapeetham-logo.png&redirect=no redirect link as it is no-where used and replaced with right link 17289ha (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 gelöscht. Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 existiert weiterhin. Aber bitte nicht einfach löschen!
Finoskov gefiel anscheinend der bisherige Kategoriename nicht. Damit habe ich kein Problem. Er legte eine neue Kategorie an, verschob den Inhalt dahin, und stellte dann den Löschantrag auf die bisherige Kategorie. Dadurch geht die Versionsgeschichte verloren. Und die Kategoriediskussion geht unter, wird vielleicht sogar gelöscht. Richtig wäre es meines Erachtens gewesen, Kategorie und Kategoriediskussion auf den neuen Namen zu verschieben.
Wünsche:

Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501 verschieben nach Category talk:Bugatti Type 101 Gangloff cabriolet 1951 (chassis 101-501) Habe ich bewusst noch nicht selber gemacht.
Finoskov ansprechen, er möge in Zukunft solche Kategorien verschieben anstatt Neuanlage und Löschantrag. Gruß

Buch-t (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beides

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, vier Wochen später ist mir wieder so ein Fall aufgefallen, weil eines meiner hochgeladenen Bilder enthalten ist. Alt Category:Bugatti type 57 roadster "Grand Raid" by Gangloff (Louwman Museum) s/n 57-222, neu Category:Bugatti Type 57 "Grand Raid" roadster Gangloff 1934 (chassis 57-222). --Buch-t (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Buch-t,

hier ist es allerdings so, dass es die "alte" Kat. ausschließlich von Finoskov bearbeitet worden war und es keine Disku gab. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist mir klar, dass es keine Diskussionsseite gab, die hätte untergehen können. Die Versionsgeschichte der Kategorienseite konnte ich nicht mehr einsehen. Ist denn der Weg, den Finoskov offensichtlich häufig wählt, regelkonform? Schließlich werden damit doch (zumindest seine) Beiträge bei der alten Kategorienseite vernichtet. --Buch-t (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nein (auf deine Frage). Ich hatte ihn ja letztes Mal auch darauf hingewiesen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, nächster Monat, die nächsten Fälle:

Category:Delage by de Villars. Diese Kategorie ist nicht ausschließlich von Finoskov bearbeitet worden.
Category:Delage Type D 8 Chapron coupe "Faux-Cabriolet" 1931
Category:Delage Type D8 S De Villars roadster 1933 (chassis 38012)

Bitte weise den Benutzer erneut auf seine Regelverstöße hin - in der Hoffnung, dass es diesmal hilft. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noch mehr entdeckt:

Category:1908 Delage Biplace Course Type F in the Musée National de l'Automobile mit mehreren anderen Bearbeitern
Category:Delage Type CO (Autoworld Brussels) 1920
Category:Delage Type CO 4 ½ litre Salamanca mit mehreren anderen Bearbeitern.

--Buch-t (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast leider nicht geantwortet. Die Kategorien wurden gelöscht. Heute habe ich wieder 5 entdeckt (Bereich Talbot-Lago wie hier), weil ich davon eine selber angelegt hatte. Ich habe 5 mal Einspruch eingelegt. Du könntest mal reinschauen, wirst aber wegen der Vorgeschichte sicherlich nicht selber entscheiden. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: fake source

Is photos taken from Instagram considered as copyright violation: fake source ? You deleted a photo named File:Zehra Gunes.jpg. Please share your insight. I am new to Wikipedia editing stuffs. Thank you. ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 08:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the wording "fake source" was by the one who tagged the image as copyvio-suspected. Anyway, you gave "www.instagram.com" as source, which is useless, as 1) you did not provide the actual source-site, where the iamge is offered, and 2) material on Instagram is not free per se. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay so images uploaded by a user on their own account is not free of copyright infrigment or any image from any social media shouldnt be uploaded here? ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you are referring to Instagram: whether images, which a user has uploaded to his/her own Instagram or Facebook account are legitimate, we cannot really know. However, even if they are, putting them on said social media-accounts does NOT mean they are under a free license. Of course, you could try to contact the account-owner and ask them whether they are able and willing to release a specific image under a free license (such as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). If they are, you could then upload said image to Commons, add {{Permission pending}} and then ask the owner to directly confirm the choosen free license for that image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU SO MUCH ZachAlexanderCarter (talk) 10:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Крым

Приветствую! Восстановите, пожалуйста, все удалённые сегодня категории Крыма, которые участник расформировал без обсуждения. Речь идёт о категория типа Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Chornomorske Raion и прочих. Подробнее см Commons:Форум#Крым. Заранее спасибо. Mitte27 (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Коллега, там десятки удалённых категорий от участника, например ещё эти (но это явно не все). Category:Bus stops in Chornomorske Raion Category:Flora of Yevpatoria Municipality Category:Nature of Chornomorske Raion Category:Geography of Chornomorske Raion Category:Roads in Chornomorske Raion Category:Mosques in Saky Raion Category:Mosques in Chornomorske Raion Category:Economy of Saky Raion

Прошу отменить весь вклад участника начиная с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024, поскольку в ручном режиме мне на это потребуется не один день. --Mitte27 (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за восстановление категорий. Подскажите, как отменить все правки Ykvach начиная с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024? --Mitte27 (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I have now restored all deleted cats since after January 25th. --Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, но дело не только в удалённых категориях. Пользователь массово изменил всю категоризацю, включая файлы. Поэтому нужно отменить все его правки с указанной даты. Теперь чтобы отменить это нужно делать вручном режиме (например так), это займёт слишком много времени в таком темпе. Поэтому прошу отменить все правки участника с 08:24, 1 февраля 2024. --Mitte27 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edit icon on Wikisite.svg

This image you deleted is actually a different color, this one is darker. 湯崩正海 (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. Thank you. 湯崩正海 (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Карты были под свободной лицензией

Добрый вечер, прошу восстановить удаленные файлы загруженные мной, они были под свободной лицензией. Их в викискладе много https://acer120.livejournal.com/168185.html Il Nur (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you need to get more specific, what files are you talking of? --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you refering to File:Этническая карта Кайбицкого района.png? If yes, please correct the author-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Cliffs Utah Temple Air Balloon Festival inquisitivemuse.png

Hi Túrelio, you recently deleted three images that were uploaded from Instagram. These photos were used with permission from the creator- and the written permission was attached to the description of the file. Would you restore the files? I sent a message to Inquisitivemuse over Messenger, I said "I would love to use your image (of the temple) on the Wikipedia page, would you give me permission to upload it there? I will credit the photo to you!" Inquisitivemuse responded with: "Sure! Glad you liked it!" I asked if they wanted me to use just the username or full name, and if I could use other photos of the temple that were uploaded, and the response I got was: "My username is fine! And I wouldn't mind if you use any others." I can post a picture of the conversation here if it will help. Thanks for your consideration! Itsetsyoufree32 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itsetsyoufree32,

if you mean by "written permission" the above cited statement, sorry, that is not sufficient. 1) A permission "for Wikipedia" is generally not sufficient. Required is a release under a license, which is compliant to our policy COM:L. Recommended is the CC-BY-SA license ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). 2) The copyright-holder needs to send his/her permission directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), from his/her official email address. --Túrelio (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images review

Hi, along my contributions there are plenty of screenshot uploads from YouTube with Creative Commons license. Could you please review the images as they haven't been yet since time ago. Majority of my uploads are also Public domain images, and not sure if they need approval as well.

Youtube

Public Domain

Regards Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 12:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reviewed the Youtube-source image, which weren't already, and scanned through the "PD-tagged" images, which seem to be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thank you very much! :) Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting empty categories

Hi, you recently deleted Category:Files needing categorization by index as empty. However, a user had recently moved Category:Files needing categories by index to that title, leaving a redirect at the old title. As you might know, my bot moves pages out of redirected categories, but it has a 7-day cooldown period in case a move is reverted. If you delete the target category as empty within the 7-day period, the contents of the old category are stranded there and can't be moved to the new title. It would be appreciated if you would please refrain from deleting categories as empty if they have been created within the past seven (7) days. Thanks! --R'n'B (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can try. However, given the huge number of empty cats tagged for speedy and that I am not the only admin deleting cats, of course, it doesn't seem a reliable solution. Couldn't your bot put a warning-note/tag into the target-categories, when detecting a redirected category, even if it takes further 7 days until he fills it? --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will see. It's probably not too hard to do. --R'n'B (talk) 23:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

Hi, you deleted my file Bridge of Wisdom جسر الحكمة which was for the UAE in Lens Competition which was asking for pictures of Arab Books by emirati authors. Ziank-photography (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ziank-photography,

yes. The reason is that the image File:Bridge of Wisdom جسر الحكمة.jpg was considered to violate the copyright of the artist who created the artwork on the cover of this book. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but then what is the point of doing Arab books by emirati authors in a competition, when it will get copyrighted? Ziank-photography (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you need to ask that the people who opened said competition. I take care that all what is uploaded to Commons, is legitimate with regard to copyright. For details see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Book covers. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks anyways Ziank-photography (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way here’s the link to the competition, just in case Ziank-photography (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:시편촬요.pdf

File:시편촬요.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miklaszewski family

Hallo, du hast um 10:10, am 13. Feb. 2024 die Category:House of Miklashevskiy gelöscht und nach Miklaszewski family verschoben. Mit der Namensänderung bin ich teilweise einverstanden.

Ursprünglich kommt dieses Adelsgeschlecht aus Polen und dessen Name ist polnisch, daher hat die Schreibweise "Miklaszewski" irgendwo ja ihre Berechtigung. Allerdings beinhaltet die Kategorie (zumindest bisher) nur diejenigen Familienmitglieder, die im Russischen Kaiserreich zur Berühmtheit gelangt sind (z.B. sie waren Gouverneure oder andere hochrangige Beamte, Politiker, Großgrundbesitzer). Auf Russisch wurde deren Name "Миклашевский" geschrieben, was in die lateinische Schrift überführt als Miklashevskiy transliteriert werden kann.

Als der russische Adel nach der Revolution geflüchtet ist, haben sich viele Miklashevskys in Deutschland, Frankreich und den USA niedergelassen. Dort haben sie ihre Namen an die jeweils örtliche Schreibweise angepasst. In Deutschland und Frankreich haben sie die Schreibweise Miklachevsky benutzt und im englischsprachigen Raum Miklashevsky. (Quelle: Miklashevskaya, Ludmila. Gender and Survival in Soviet Russia. A Life in the Shadow of Stalin’s Terror. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi, Sydney; first published in Great Britain,Bloomsbury Academic, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc,[2007, 2012].ISBN 978-1-3501-3921-3. p. xii.).

Es gibt auch zeitgenössische vorrevolutionäre deutschsprachige Quellen, die den Namen als Miklaschewski schreiben - z.B. Rigasches Adressbuch von 1910, S. 149 und Rigasches Adressbuch von 1911, S. 150.

Der Name heutiger Familienmitglieder wird amtlich als Miklashevsky von den russischen Passbehörden transliteriert. Einige Familienmitglieder leben in Deutschland und ihre Schreibweise ist genau diese (siehe z.B. hier).

Da bisher in der Commons-Category nur Familienmitglieder der russischen Linie der Familie enthalten sind, wäre die gegenwärtige russische Schreibweise für die Benennung sinnvoll - also Miklashevsky.

Gleichwohl arbeite ich seit Längerem an einigen Wikipedia-Artikeln zur Geschichte der Familie, die ich demnächst veröffentlichen werde, und darin werde ich auch auf die polnischen Ursprünge eingehen und einige polnische Familienmitglieder hervorheben und in die Commons-Category aufnehmen. Aus dieser Perspektive kann ich mit deiner Benennung der Kategorie mitgehen, denn in Kürze wird sie richtig werden. Dann (erst) wird die polnische Benennung stimmen.

So, nun abgesehen aber vom Namen, der Miklaszewski bleiben kann, finde ich, dass die Kategorie "House of..." heißen soll, statt "family". Es ist üblich, im Deutschen wie im Englischen, dass man von Adelsgeschlechtern bzw. -häusern spricht, und nicht von Familien. (siehe z.B. List of noble houses). Siehe auch andere Commons-Kategorien über Adel - Category:House of Hohenzollern, Category:House of Habsburg, Category:House of Windsor.

Ich habe deshalb versucht, die Kategorie nun nochmals zu verschieben als House of Miklaszewski, allerdings ist es mir nur halb geglückt. Ohne Administratorenrechte kann ich die darin enthaltenen Dateien und Unterkategorien nicht mitverschieben. Ich wäre dir dankbar, wenn du mir helfen würdest.

Vielen Dank. Liglioto (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Liglioto, Category:House of Miklashevskiy war heute von User:Heroldicas als Weiterleitung erstellt und sofort danach wieder zur Löschung beantragt worden, mit der Begründung, dass "Miklaszewski family" der korrekte Kategoriename sei. Diese erbeten Löschung hatte ich ausgeführt. Ich habe nun einmal in die Oberkategorie Category:Noble families of Poland geschaut; dort findet sich tatsächlich nur das Namensschema "Familienname family". Auch wenn ich deine obige Argumentation nachvollziehen kann, wäre es gut, wenn du die Angelegenheit zunächst zur Diskussion stellen oder zumindest mit User:Heroldicas diskutieren und einen Konsens erreichen würdest. --Túrelio (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danke :) Liglioto (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate

Hello Túrelio. Is this video really a duplicate of the one it redirects to? When I uploaded it I was quite sure its quality was higher… Who tagged it as a duplicate? Cheers, RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also with this file. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RodRabelo7,

both had been tagged by Kelly The Angel.

The 1st one: both versions report resolution 1.920 × 1.080, though your file was far biggger.

The 2nd one: both versions report resolution 1.920 × 1.080, though your file was somewhat biggger. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upload new file with different format

Hello Túrelio, I just uploaded a logo [8] in jpg format instead of png, which I intended to do since I have it in png format with transparency and no background. However, upon attempting to upload it, I encountered an error stating, "File extension ".jpg" does not match the detected MIME type of the file (image/png)." What can be done in this scenario? Regards Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Throwawayjamal047,

indeed you cannot upload a jpg/jpeg-format file over ("new version") an existing png-format file, as they are different. You need to upload the jpg-file as a separate file (new upload). The filename can be identical, however, the extension needs to equate the file-format. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, can you speedy delete this image anyways, as there is no need of it if there is another duplicate and same picture. Thank you very much Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 09:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and you cannot upload en:File:Mehran FC logo.jpg to Commons, as it is fair-use, which is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lycée Autogéré de Paris jean Lévi(2)

Bonjour, je suis Jacques Lévi, frère de Jean Lévi. Je galère pour inclure le texte "Jean Lévi un Pionnier pédagogique" . Une amie m'avait fait le travail en oct. 2023 je crois. Tellement heureux que ce renvoi jean levi '2) marche à nouveau, car il ne fonctionnait pas depuis sans doute longtemps. Bref, pourriez vous me dire la raison le cas échéant du retrait. Pour moi c'est important et mémoriel. Si il y avait un pb de photo, il s'agissait d'un portait de mon frère réalisé en famille par moi, Jacques Lévi. Je suis personnellement incapable de faire inclure ce texte ni la photo noir et blanc de Jean. S'il vous plait, Merci infiniment de me joindre jacqueslevi78@gmail.com si vous vouliez bien m'aider. Cordialement. Jeanlev78 (talk) 17:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Löschbefugnis

Guten Morgen Túrelio, wer kann auf Commons Dateien löschen, nur Admins oder auch Mitglieder des Support-Teams? Gisbert K (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Gisbert K,

innerhalb der Projekthierarchie m.W. nur Admins und Personen mit den darauf basierenden "höheren Weihen", d.h. Check-user, Bürokraten und Oversighter. Stewards natürlich auch, aber sie stehen ja ober/außerhalb der Projekthierarchie und spielen, als Amt, auf Commons eigentlich keine Rolle. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello Túrelio, Can you delete these files with bad image quality for replacement with high quality version? Thank you. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]

[1] → (Can be replaced with this)
[2] → (Can be replaced with this)
[3] → (Can be replaced with this)
[4] → (Can be replaced with this)
[5] → (Can be replaced with this)
[6] → (Can be replaced with this)
[7] → (Can be replaced with this)
[8] → (Can be replaced with this)
[9] → (Can be replaced with this)
[10] → (Can be replaced with this)
[11] → (Can be replaced with this)
[12] → (Can be replaced with this)
[13] → (Can be replaced with this)

--Lee6597 (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review these

Closed the dealt with part. (non-admin closure) ShaanSengupta^Talk 08:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello @Túrelio. You helped last time. I am here again with a request for you to kindly review some GODL-India images that I have uploaded or have worked on in past few days. Its presence in the given link needs to be confirmed. It will be of great help. Some of these are used widely by some of the most viewed pages on Wikipedia.

Although there are more files but I am stopping here bcoz the list gas already got too long. Also to ask Turelio can I get License Reviewer rights if not permanently then for sometime. I promise that I shall use it only to try to clear the backlog of GODL-India bcoz the list of unreviewed files under this license is very long. Even if I don't get the rights I will request to clear this much atleast. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much @Túrelio. Adding just one more to the list for review File:The Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi in a Bilateral Meeting with the President of the United States of America, Mr. Joe Biden, at White House, in Washington DC, USA on September 24, 2021 (6).jpg. Also, Can we do something to clear the backlog. Because there are a lot of violations. Works by The Parliament are uploaded wrongly under GODL-India which is a violation. Both bcoz it doesn't come under it and also the website copyright policy states requirement of email permission. I have been nominating clear violations for SD, many of whom were deleted by you and others. But lately they are being converted to discussions bcoz of which I am loosing interest. I don't blame the process but clear violations need to be dealt immediately. ShaanSengupta^Talk 10:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Túrelio, I would request you to kindly delete previous version of File:Ruling Alliances in India.jpg which I uploaded. The file is my own work and previous versions have no relevance. And I also don't want it to be here. Especially the one which has black background on top and bottom of the main thing. I will be thamkful to you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Thank you once again for acting on my request. I have got some more GODL-India files for you to review. These are last of the lot. Next one if required won't be before April.

Thanking you in advance. ShaanSengupta^Talk 15:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

<-- the source-site in the last file (and its cropped files) does not show the correct image, the deeplink does. --> Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing and informing me. That was a misunderstanding of idv1 and idv2 by the original uploader. I have fixed it. ShaanSengupta^Talk 03:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Original upload deleted as duplicate of posterior upload

File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg was uploaded before File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943.jpg and yet the first one was the one that was deleted as duplicate? Please undelete the first file as it was the first to be uploaded and given that these are different versions. Tm (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tm, well, File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg was uploaded February 4th 2024, which is later than January 15 2024, when File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943.jpg was uploaded. In addition, the former file had been tagged {{SD|G7}} by uploader User:Le Petit Chat. The latter might have happened because he realized it was duplicate. IMO, at least in this case everything is fine. However, I will check each of the other files you have listed. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer but sorry, for the confusion File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943 (52231775383).jpg it seems was indeed uploaded on February 4 as per the deletion logs and, according to what you said above by User:Le Petit Chat.

However, the file that might be the original upload in this case also deleted as an duplicate, i think if i am not mistaken is File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943. (52231775383).jpg (as per original flickr name, with a dot between 1943 and (52231775383). )I say this because i rarely chance the filenames of my uploads of this flickr account (except do to limitations on name lenght) and the source is named "SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943." with the dot.

Sorry again for the confusion, as i have no way of seeing who the uploaders of deleted files are but i think that File:SC 170022 - A French armored car at an airdrome in North Africa. 17 February, 1943. (52231775383).jpg is indeed the original upload of August 3 2022. Thank you again for checking all out. Cheers. Tm (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same with File:SC 170023 - Moroccan cavalry in the streets in North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52232247115).jpg, as both were uploaded in August 2 2022 and these new uploads in new filenames are from January 2024, as can be seen my posterior upload to this two images and anterior upload to this two images. Tm (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the same can be said about your deletions of originals uploads of, as i always upload since 2022 all new files from the [https://www.flickr.com/people/signalcorpsarchive Signal Corps Archive flickr account almost as soon as they are available, sometimes only in a matter of few hours, so i know that all this files were the original uploads to Commons and those that have been redirected to are the real duplicates (aslso because they are the same exact resolution and differ only in very slight different exposures, crops, etc):

File:SC 170074 - Frederick O. Bird, director of the allied club in N. Africa is speaking to several Arabic Spahi troops (cavalry), who were inquiring concerning their friends. 20 February, 1943 (52233497374).jpg

File:SC 171567 - American soldiers teach French Army officers and man the use of American military equipment. A BD-72 Field Switchboard in operation near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271088907).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 179431 - General view of Goumiers, French Arab troops, with horses. Mistretta, Sicily. 30 July, 1943 (52516791200).jpg

File:SC 171568 - American soldiers teach the French the use of BD-72 common battery switchboard. In background an M1 Scout Car with transmitter. Near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271183337).jpg

File:SC 405104 - American and French troops presented arms before the ceremonies awarding the Legion of Merit at Place Foch. 12 October, 1943 (52134857086).jpg

File:SC 196160 - French troops of 3rd Inf. Div., 7th Alg., move through first town liberated in new French drive (51988083751).jpg

File:SC 411772 - M-4 medium tank passing through St. Pole to take part in the drive on Dadonville, 19 November 1944. (49539374892).jpg

File:SC 171566 - French officers operating SCR-284 radio with hand crank generator (52272056091).jpg

File:SC 170133 - A column of Moroccan Commando troops called "Goums" retreating from Sidi Bou Sid (52238007874).jpg

File:SC 170074 - Frederick O. Bird, director of the allied club in N. Africa is speaking to several Arabic Spahi troops (cavalry), who were inquiring concerning their friends. 20 February, 1943 (52233497374).jpg

File:SC 171563 - French soldiers shown operating radio in U.S. Army Scout Car, to show the French how to operate American Military Equipment. Near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943. (52273710726).jpg

File:SC 196123 - Maj. Gen. Walton H. Walker, Commanding general 20th Corps, 3rd Army, is presented with the French Fouragere (Fourragère) by Major Paul Aubrey, commanding officer of the regular French Army (52009840622).jpg

File:SC 196321 - French Commando fires 30 caliber machine-gun at German positions on the road to Belfort, as his compatriots watch. 20 November, 1944 (51977020786).jpg

File:SC 196670 - A Moroccan soldier waits in cover for an expected enemy counterattack, Mulhouse area, France. 22 November, 1944. (49547644262).jpg

File:SC 197061 - German prisoners captured in house to house fighting are rounded up by French soldiers on the outskirts of Belfort, France. 20 November, 1944. (49537558328).jpg

File:SC 171567 - American soldiers teach French Army officers and man the use of American military equipment. A BD-72 Field Switchboard in operation near Algiers, North Africa. 9 February, 1943 (52271088907).jpg

File:SC 184716 - Mules start up a steep trail at Pantano with supplies for the troops, of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division, (French), at the top of Mount Pantano (52273649537).jpg

File:SC 190576 - Shown here are American medics giving aid to a group of French soldiers... (49627515686).jpg

File:SC 196563 - Captain P. Hennick, and M. Jules Tonnelier, president of the Ancien Combattants, place a wreath on the monument erected to the heroes of World War I. Seventh Army. France. 12 November, 1944. (49538549121).jpg

File:SC 197062 - A tank crosses a treadway bridge near Belfort, France, as the French drive to take this German strong point. November 20, 1944. (49537491182).jpg

File:SC 329865 - Troops of the French 9th Colonial Inf. Div., boarding LCI in preparation for the invasion of Elba (52593787456).jpg, File:SC 329861 - Invading troops of the 5th Colonial Inf. Div. coming ashore at Marina Di Campo, Elba, under protection of smoke screen. 17 June, 1944 (52593611542).jpg

File:SC 196672 - A French Moroccan soldier, of the 1st French Army, covers a street in Mulhouse, France, as the fighting continues (49595538353).jpg

File:SC 196668 - A French tank machine-guns a German strong point on a street in Belfort, France. 22 November, 1944. (49540683392).jpg

File:SC 195531 - The first French regiment of Paris, France, recently organized and put in uniform, passes in review. 2 October, 1944 (52598107804).jpg

File:SC 193043 - A duplicator is used by these clerks of the 2nd French Armored Division at headquarters (53400217928).jpg

File:SC 193028-S - Members of a French Army Labor Battalion (Indo-Chinese), stand at the entrance to their encampment, awaiting orders from the Allies (53399856198).jpg

File:SC 171735 - Tunisian bystanders, at the historic occasion of the Allied entry into the captured seaport, applaud as motorcycle troops roll past. 1943 (52274659611).jpg

File:SC 171734 - A joyous father helped his small daughter onto a British armored car, while the young girl stood to salute Allied Armies as they entered Tunis, North Africa. 1943 (52279220794).jpg

File:SC 184718 - Two soldiers of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French) sit near their foxhole on the slopes of Mt. Pantano after they have helped to chase the enemy from the rest of the hill. 18 December, 1943 (52274087349).jpg

File:SC 192994-S - Parisians examine the tanks used by the French 2nd Armored Division and question the men about them and their entry into Paris. 25 August, 1944 (53402022460).jpg

File:SC 193076 - Pt. Phillipe De Gaulle, son of General De Gaulle and an officer of the 2nd French Armored Division, checks maps before going into action, somewhere in France. 16 August, 1944 (53403463574).jpg

File:SC 192995-S - Maquis who helped to liberate Paris silently watch while defeated Nazi soldiers are led along a Paris street to prison following their surrender. 25 August, 1944 (53400671512).jpg

File:SC 170028 - French soldiers in railway cars ready to leave Tebessa, North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52233215193).jpg

File:Soldiers of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French), unload boxes of American "K" Rations from a pack train which hauls supplies partially up the slope of Mount Pantano for troops on the heights (52272343931).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 170075 - Interior of the American Red Cross Club in Oran, North Africa. 20 February, 1943 (52232234387).jpg

File:SC 170029 - French troops and equipment in railway cars ready to leave. 18 February, 1943 (52235401654).jpg

File:SC 184719 - A wounded soldier of the 5th Rifle Regiment, 2nd Moroccan Division (French), is being carried down the slopes of Mount Pantano to the town of Pantano where he can be evacuated for further treatment (52271398367).jpg

File:SC 193134 - French 2nd Armored Division passes through the streets of Meudon, just before entering Paris. A Renaut plant is in the background left. 25 August, 1944 (53408025010).jpg

File:SC 193027-S - French WACs attached to branches of the French Army, on beach at St. Tropez, southern France. 17 August, 1944 (53399936674).jpg

File:SC 193016-S - Still under enemy shell fire, tanks of the 2nd French Armored Division advance on the city of Anthony, France (53401469655).jpg

File:SC 171734 - A joyous father helped his small daughter onto a British armored car, while the young girl stood to salute Allied Armies as they entered Tunis, North Africa. 1943.jpg

File:SC 196667 - A group of German snipers, taken during the fight for a road leading out of Belfort, France, is led through the streets of the city by members of the 1st French Armored Division. 22 November, 1944. (49538485291).jpg

File:SC 170379 - French Army officers and men take firing courses on American Military weapons, under American instruction. The firing of the Garand rifle in North Africa. 4 February, 1943 (52234478131).jpg

File:SC 170104 - An Italian tank that was destroyed by the Allies in North Africa. 20 February, 1943 (52232368592).jpg

File:SC 170024 - Moroccan cavalry in the streets in North Africa. 18 February, 1943 (52231772551).jpg

File:SC 170095 - Italian tank destroyed by Allied gun. Kasserine Pass, Tunisia. 24 February, 1943 (52232369410).jpg

In summary around 50 images that were original uploads, but deleted as being duplicates of posterior uploads with the same source and resolution. And big waste of time to me that took the time to make this uploada and, besides other users, categorize them. So much time simply throw away into the deletion bin?

So, given that the error was of your doing, undelete the original ones and, if needed, delete the real duplicates. And i ask you how is this possible, as one or two is a comphreensible error but dozens of original images (many uploaded in 2021 or 2022) deleted as duplicates of posterior uploads (all made on January 2024) that are the real duplicates? Thanks. Tm (talk) 23:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression fichier Aile droite d'une statuette de Victoire, bronze, découverte rue Hoche, années 1960. Collections du Musée de Bretagne.jpg

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé le fichier Aile droite d'une statuette de Victoire, bronze, découverte rue Hoche, années 1960. Collections du Musée de Bretagne, sous prétexte qu'il n'était pas libre de droit. Il est pourtant sous la licence CC-BY, comme l'indique sa notice sur le site du musée de Bretagne. Pas la peine d'annuler votre suppression, j'ai refait un versement. Merci de mieux vous renseigner à l'avenir pour éviter les pertes de temps. CDT. Zélie.F (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Zélie.F: ,

let's stick to the available facts: the image was uploaded under the claim to be own work by the uploader.

Another user found it to be published in a scientific paper from 2021[9], published under a Commons-incompatible license (CC-BY-NC-ND). The image itself was credited to Musée de Bretagne. As there was no license-specification for this image, it is reasonable to transfer the paper's license also to this image. Therefore, the deletion was justified.

The link to http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ark:/83011/FLMjo222590 currently doesn't help, as the site is not available. This problem concerns also your upload File:Aile droite de statuette de Victoire.jpg.--Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just quick remarks:

The scientific paper license explicitly applies only to the text, not the images.
http://www.collections.musee-bretagne.fr/ is available but only from France, I improved the file and removed the {{LR}} templates.

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about homescreen removal from openharmony

hi, and thanks and for reading, I wanted to ask what was the problem in the file that was deleted about OpenHarmony HomeScreen? because it is an open source version and for free use,it was donated by Huawei to be freely usable as a part of its closed source operating system it is possible that it has been confused with HarmonyOS or HarmonyOS next? wiKipedia alerted me about the recent deletion of a similar file and that's why I didn't complete the upload an image file of OpenHarmony, could you help me to see the problem? Thx Ezequiel 449 (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ezequiel 449,

you are talking about File:HarmonyOS3HomeNew.jpg, right? Does it belong to en:OpenHarmony? If yes, the article states that is under the Appach license. So, the appropriate license-tag would be {{Apache}}. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done, thanks for the help Ezequiel 449 (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of some images

Dear Túrelio, I would like to delete four images that I have uploaded. These are File:Membership of the Great Power System.png, File:Rekening Jan Perquin.png, File:Nonnenveld in 1907.png and File:Logo Korein.jpg. How can I get these removed? Can you possibly do this? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning S. Perquin,

for the remaining one, you need to open a regular deletion-request, as it was uploaded quite some time ago and, IMO, has some value. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Tordesillas is not copyright

Hello Túrelio, I just wanted to say if you did your research the article that I found it from it said "This photo has only identifying purpose: no copyright infringement intended. If you are the author or owner of the photo write us an email to info at filmaffinity.com or contact us on Twitter to accredit you" so it's not copyright until someone takes credit Pupusareawesome (talk) 22:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pupusareawesome, assuming you are talking about File:Jake Tordesillas.jpg. The above cited text is typical for images, that are used under the U.S. fair-use rules, i.e. that the user has no copyright and no specific permission. However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. It can be used and uploaded directly to :en-Wikipedia, but must be claimed as fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erklärung zu Löschung

Guten Tag Túrelio, ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du mir folgenden Sachverhalt erläutern könntest: Das Bild: File:Rogier van der Weyden The Altar of Our Lady Miraflores Altar Google Art Project.jpg wurde von dir gelöscht. (Siehe auch meine Disk-Seite). Ich möchte gerne verstehen, warum. Könntest du mir auch den Link zuschicken, vom Melder (Antragsteller) zur Löschung, den finde ich nirgendwo. LG Upti (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Upti,

die Datei war von User:Oursana, einem erfahrenen Benutzer, alc copyvio-suspect mit der Begründung "as non free frame still under copyright protection" markiert worden. Ich vermute, dass die zugrundeliegende Rationale ist, dass das Foto selbst nicht von dir stammte und deshalb {{PD-Art}} verwendet wurde. PD-Art darf aber nur für 2-dimensionale Bilder verwendet werden. Deshalb wird da üblicherweise der meist 3-dimensionale Rahmen weggeschnitten. Aber am besten fragst du Oursana selbst. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Túrelio, vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Nur noch 2 Bitten: Sollte ich selbst einen Löschantrag stellen wollen (Grund: 3-dimensionaler Rahmen) wo müsste ich das tun? (Könntest du mir den Link zusenden, bitte) und Folgendes von mir hochgeladene Bild habe ich falsch benannt (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SDg_030_KKS2956.jpg), könntest du es löschen, ich lade es danach erneut (mit richtigem Namen) hoch. Im voraus vielen lieben Dank LG Upti (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moin Upti,

das 2. Bild habe ich gelöscht, wie erbeten. Worauf bezieht sich der zunächst genannte Löschantrag? Das "Rogier van der Weyden .."-Bild war ja schon gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Túrelio, danke fürs löschen. Ich wollte nur wissen, wenn ich selbst einmal einen Löschantrag (Grund: 3-dimensionaler Rahmen) stellen wollte, wo müßte ich das tun? (Könntest du mir den Link hierfür zusenden) LG Upti (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schau mal hier Category:Images with non-free frames, auf dieser Kategorieseite stehen die Dateien, bei denen der 3D-Rahmen um ein eigentlich gemeinfreies 2D-Bild entfernt werden müssen, samt einer Anleitung. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deine "Expertenmeinung" bzgl. Umbenennung von Ortskategorien - jetzt Stadtteil und Flusskategorien mit Pfeil

Guten Tag Túrelio, ich habe mir in den letzten Tagen einige Kategorien auf einer Liste notiert, die chaotisch befüllt sind. Mache ich mir die Arbeit - dann könnte ich das auf einen aktuell gültigen Stand bringen, auch sollte es nicht zu neuen Komplikationen führen.

(1) Im Pool zur Flusskategorie <Tributaries of the Werra> tummeln sich inzwischen fast 50 Zuflüsse deren Schreibweise (Lemma) aber nur zum Teil mit dem zutreffenden Wikipedia-Artikel passen. Es finden sich auch einige Sonderfälle: Herpf (→Werra)‎ Das Pfeilsymbol ist ein Sonderzeichen und somit nicht mit gewöhnlichen Tastaturen schreibbar - Barrierefreiheit. Es ist aber bei kleinen Bächen, die nur in einer Gemeinde existieren, sinnvoll, denn viele Gewässernamen der Zuflüsse sind mehrfach in DACH zu finden. Ansonsten findet (river) - (Fluss) und (Werra) häufig Verwendung. Ich bitte um einen Tip, denn demnächst kann ich noch weitere 50 Bäche und Flüsschen per Karte beitragen.

(2) Die Gemeindefusionen der letzten 30 Jahre haben dazu geführt, das es in den Ortsteilnamen ziemlich viele "Abweichler" gibt. Ein größerer Stadtteil von Bad Liebenstein ist der Ort Steinbach (Wartburgkreis). Momentan mit etwa 100 Dateien befüllt. Sinnvoller wäre es, alle Subkategorien in <Steinbach (Bad Liebenstein)> umzubenennen. Aber in der Geschichte der Nachwendezeit war <Steinbach (Wartburgkreis)> ja auch mal existent . Was macht Sinn: eine Weiterleitung oder ein Erläuterungstext um diese aktuelle Situation zu verfestigen. Was meinst Du? beste Grüße EACC80 (talk) 11:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore the file deleted under a possible copyright infringement

The file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Map_of_DSB_Campus,_Kumaun_University,_Nainital,_Uttarakhand.jpg This file is my creation in its entirety, it is not from a university brochure. The university was provided with this file by me for printing a physical map and bears my name as designer and creator. At least try to communicate beforehand. Harshit SR (talk) 07:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Restored. Other issue, did you personally colorize File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939-colored.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for restoring the file.

And as for the other file about polish victim of German Luftwaffe, yes, I colorized it manually on Adobe Photoshop. Harshit SR (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brooklyn Public Library Rugby Branch image

If I were to upload a new image under the same file name, would I be able to have that "old revision" image deleted, which is the common practice with fair use images on Wikipedia? or should have the current image deleted under a non-speedy proper process? Either way please let me know what is the best process to take. QuasyBoy (talk) 13:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

if the new image is similar to the old one, we could speedy the old version. It seems to have no current external uses. --Túrelio (talk) 14:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted it speedy deleted. I have a new recent photo version of the same location from a different angle. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, upload the "new version" over the old one File:Brooklyn Public Library Rugby Branch.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I just uploaded the new image, what are the measures I need to do to delete the old image? QuasyBoy (talk) 18:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hakawi News

You rightfully copyvio-deleted some screenshots on Feb. 26 including this one. Because of a discussion at AN, I would like to know what date कटासमुला (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) uploaded that file. HouseOfChange (talk) 18:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the log it was 04:00, 14. Feb. 2024. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. So from timestamps it looks as if on February 14, कटासमुला started some publicity work with photos on mugs, but on February 17, two other editors created additional spam photos to upload for their project at Commons. HouseOfChange (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updating File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg

Hi, I was wondering if you could update File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg. The file at File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg is a much more representation of the image. There's been an effort for several months to update the file but to no avail. Since the former can only be updated by administrators, I was wondering if you could update the file? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've asked User talk:Fry1989 for comment, as he is experienced in flags and COAs, and had many edits in this file. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it looks like Fry1989 approved of the update to the file, could you update the file? For reference, the the request to update the protected image is on this page. Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 07:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion request

Hi, I see that seven days have passed since the deletion request for the File:M01 (cropped).jpg. Can the discussion be closed? What will happen about the deletion? IM-yb (talk) 11:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem I see is that this image seems to be heavily used externally; see here. All sites hotlinking this image (which is not recommended), would loose it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used by three low readability websites. Is this a reason for a potentially copyright violation image to remain on wikimedia commons? What will happen with the discussion? Will it stay open? Until when? What should be done to delete this particular image? IM-yb (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the policies listed:

A file or page can be listed for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests in the following cases:
The file/page has an unclear copyright status but the method described at Missing legal information cannot be used.

and

If the closing admin is unable to say with reasonable certainty that the file can validly be kept, it should be deleted in accordance with Commons' precautionary principle.
It is not the task of the closing admin to engage in detailed legal or factual research in order to find a rationale to keep the file. Under the rules of evidence we apply here, the burden of showing that the file can be validly hosted here lies with the uploader and anyone arguing that it should be kept.

Are these not enough? IM-yb (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite familiar with our policies. The issue is, that your copyvio-rationale is not very convincing IMO. Therefore, my assessment was based on a "uploader deletion request". --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

deleting categories isn't helpful

deleting categories isn't helpful if you don't correct all links. Like here or here. Please try redirects. ...Sicherlich ^talk 19:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tut mir leid, dass du da nacharbeiten musstest. Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass derjenige (nicht ich), der die Löschung der Kategorie angefordert hatte, eventuell nötige Umbenennungen selbst vorgenomemn hat. --Túrelio (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das nacharbeiten ist ja nicht das Problem; sondern die recht große Chance, dass man es halt nicht bemerkt. Ich wusste jetzt auch nur, dass es verlinkt ist weil ich es gerade erst getan habe und die Änderung bei meinen Bildern gesehen habe. Ohne redirect bleibt es sonst halt unentdeckt und der Lese steht doof da ...Sicherlich ^talk 22:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frage und Bitte

Guten Tag Túrelio,
ich habe 78 Dateien mit falschem Erscheinungsdatum versehen.
Frage: Hast Du ein Werkzeug, mit dem Du die Dateien (ohne zu großen Aufwand) verschieben oder umbenennen kannst??
Es handelt sich um die Dateien in dieser Kategorie:
Category:Orchids to move 4,
die anstelle der Jahreszahl (1923) am Ende der Datei die Jahreszahl (1925) haben sollten.
....es würde mir viel Zeit ersparen, die Dateien einzeln zu verschieben
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 18:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, manuell; ich kenne kein Tool, das so eine selektive Änderung vornehmen könnte. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

…ich sage Dir ganz herzlichen Dank. Dass Du alles manuell bearbeiten musstest, hat mich nicht ganz zufrieden gestellt. Deine Zeit ist sehr wertvoll. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CH-NB-Ansichten Italien (Italy)

You deleted this category as being empty, it now is no longer empty & should be restored. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalinga super cup

Logo useful for season page if can reupload Loptač01 (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking abaout? You have no deleted upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Alconi badge on Ren pageault 8

You seem too zealous with the copyright rules. This is a badge displayed and sold on all Renault Alconi model vehicles sold 1966, 67, 68 to distinguish from sister cars. It is same as Gordini sign or any other model! Its not a copy or patent unless used on a vehicle that is fake or copy! It should be undone. ~~~~ Aldercraft (talk) 03:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have no deleted upload with a filename that resembles anything of your headline. What file are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is on the wiki Renault 8 site.

curprev 11:43, 28 January 2024‎ CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ 18,235 bytes −77‎ Removing Alconi_door_pillar_badge.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright violation; see c:Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-free logo above [[:c:Co undothank Aldercraft (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg

Hi, I just wanted to follow up on our previous conversation here. It looks like Fry1989 approves of updating the file using File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg from his talk page. I was wondering if you would be willing to update File:Emblem of Vietnam.svg by overwriting it with File:Emblem of Vietnam (fixed).svg and merging the two files? Thank you. Colohisto (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pectoral of Senusret III (2018).jpg

Dear Turelio,

Could you or another reviewer or Admin like Taivo please review this image please that I uploaded? I had to crop the photo so it will have to be reviewed by hand eventually anyway. I persuaded the flickr account owner to license the image freely. It is a very rare jewellry. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museo Ottocento Bologna

Hello, Category:Museo Ottocento Bologna is the correct category, "Museo Ottocento Bologna" is the correct name of the museum, look at [10] [11]. Category:Museo dell'Ottocento (Bologna) is not, is just a descriptive category (The "Museo Ottocento Bologna" is a museums about art in the 19th. century, and it is a museum in Bologna.) Please restore the correct category of the museum. Pạtạfisik 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Niketto sr.: --Pạtạfisik 18:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've restored the category and accordingly corrected the WikiData-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barter System.png

First of all: Thank you very much for all your good work, for deleting (nearly) all the categories I nominate for deletion.
But now you deleted a file, where I have doubts about. This morning I added a question for Gnomingstuff about the deletion request for File:Barter System.png (see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Barter_System.png). According to a notification email I received, (s)he answered my question, but I could not read it, because you have already deleted it. I figuered out that perhaps the file might not be copyright violation because at least one of the figures on it is in the public domain. Is there another explanation? JopkeB (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- apologies that you didn't get to see my response. The gist: The thing with tineye is that unless there is a very obvious source of an image (like a news story where the photographer is sourced to someone on staff), the earliest hit that is returned is not necessarily the original source, because of linkrot and the fact that stock images tend to often be used on sites that don't stick around. Even with stock images it is often unclear what the original source was, because these sites cannibalize one another all the time and not necessarily in ways that honor license. This is why I usually go off whether there are hits that predate the supposed creation date that the uploader said, as it all but proves that they just grabbed it off the internet.

With this particular user they seem to have uploaded a lot of diagrams with images of questionable provenance (and to be honest questionable quality) so it seemed to be a case where the precautionary principle would apply. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@both, if you prefer to discuss it thorougly, I can undelete it and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Gnomingstuff and Túrelio: for your reactions and answer. This is enough to convince me that this image should not be on Commons, too many doubts. So undeletion is not necessary. JopkeB (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women of The Gambia by name

Es ist wohl keiner in der Lage die Vorlage für die Wikidata so zu ändern, dass sie keinen Blödsinn macht. Eine Idee war, wenn die Category:Women of The Gambia by name gar nicht existiert, das dann die Vorlage die Kategorien korrekt nach Category:Women of the Gambia by name einsortiert. Kann du das mal mit der Schnelllöschung überprüfen oder gar die Vorlage korrigieren? Danke Atamari (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe die Kategorie testweise mal gelöscht. Ich befürchte bloß, dass das nichts bringt, siehe Commons:Forum. --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ЛДК.jpg

Hello! This deletion reason doesn't seem valid: this website doesn't own the copyright of this 1912 photograph that is obviously under PD-RusEmpire. Or was it uploaded as Own work? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, it was claimed as own work by Spacedog228. If you are sure it is in the PD, I can undelete it and put it into a regular DR to give time to gather the required information. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sinnloses Löschen von Categorien im Wartburgkreis (WAK)

Hallo, in den letzten Tagen bin ich mehrfach auf gelöschte Kategorien - z.B. "Wood in Geisa, in Seebach (Wartburgkreis), ... gestoßen. Ergo irgendjemand arbeitet im Verborgenen und sabotiert die Arbeit. Es ist aber sinnlos, denn ich arbeite systematisch und zyklisch den ganzen WAK nach Themen. Damals waren es hölzerne Gebäude, jetzt hölzerne Skulpturen, in Kürze hölzerne Zäune, hölzerne Kreuze, hölzerne ... Daher meine Bitte - wenn Du auf eine scheinbar leere Kategorie zum Wartburgkreis triffst - ignoriere sie - ich werde die zeitnah weiter auffüllen, und auch die gelöschten Dateien werden sich "erneuern" - ich habe eine tägliche Protokollliste und werde an Hand der Orte herausfinden welche Datei dort entfernt oder gelöscht wurde und somit komme ich dem Saboteur auf die Spur und dann gibt's Ärger. EACC80 (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, werds versuchen. Wenn du mir eine konkrete dieser Kategorien benennen kannst, kann ich in der Versionsgeschichte nachschauen, wer sie markiert hatte. Vielleicht liegt ja ein Mißverständnis zugrunden. --Túrelio (talk) 13:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo - ich danke Dir für die rasche Reaktion. Ich habe vermehrt bei Wooden buildings in ORT - heuer wars bei Geisa und Empertshausen bemerkt. Irgendjemand macht mir das Leben schwer. Hölzerne Gebäude sind in jedem Ort und bei der Fülle an Bildern kann ich da auch massig liefern, aber jetzt will ich den Kategoriebaum möglichst rasch und komplex hochziehen, denn diese Arbeit vermeiden die meisten Kollegen. EACC80 (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiederherstellung

Guten Tag! Wäre es möglich, dass du die letzten vier (von mir erstellten) Kategorien zum Offenen Bundesmeile in Bern wieder herstellen könntest? Weil ich möchte in Kürze die Dateien hochladen! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmet Düz, erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the categories fit well into the parent categories. Please delete the 3 subcategories and keep only the main one. Enhancing999 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Question

Hi, I nominated a bunch of images (that aren't being used on any projects) for deletion. You said to start a DR. I'll be honest, my work here is very slim to nil (I'm mostly on en.Wiki). So could you point me in the direction of DR or tell me what I'm supposed to do? Thanks....NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was offline a while. I see you have found already the way to start regular deletion-requests (DR). --Túrelio (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucas Bravo.png

Hey, Could you please review this one for me?:) ArturSik (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed IShowSpeed image.

Hello.

You removed the image from the IShowSpeed page allegedly for copyright. please check the copyright and information on the picture before removing it. all the information is correct. MrRapide (talk) 09:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

in case you are refering to File:Ishowspeed in 2023.jpg , "source=www.youtube.com" is not a proper source-entry. You need to link to the specific page with the video, from which the screenshot/frame was taken. --Túrelio (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About File:Ohno.H.jpg

Hello Túrelio.

I wanted to ask you why you deleted File:Ohno.H.jpg since it's my own work. I don't have that much of knowlege of Wikimedia Commons so teach me if something wen't wrong. KBO36 (talk) 06:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KBO36,

it had been tagged as copyvio-suspect by another user and was indeed found published elsewhere. If you would like to discuss it, I can temp-undelete it and put it into a regular DR.--Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This homepage is my own page, so I own the copyright.

Wouldn't it be a problem if I included more detailed information in the upload file name　or is there another way. KBO36 (talk) 06:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing some research and came across a misunderstanding.

Thank you for your cooperation. KBO36 (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've undeleted the file, removed the speedy-tag and put it into a regular DR, wqhich allows a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Display issues

Hello Turélio!

Since you have fixed the issues with File:Fabulas (9ª edição).pdf, could you also do the same with File:O Ganso das Neves.pdf? Both cases have been edited with ilovepdf.com, but I don't know why this glitch happens... Thanks, Erick Soares3 (talk) 12:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! But the File:Fabulas (9ª edição).pdf glitched again - but I hope that it is some issue with Commons itself. For much, the worst part is that the pages at the Portuguese Wikisource still have the glitch even after the PDF was fixed... Erick Soares3 (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea how this can happen. One thing you might try: upload the last image-version under a filename without "special" characters, such as ª ç ã, just as a test. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Helmut Sinzinger

Hallo Turelio, ich nehme an dass der User:Helmut Sinzinger und jener in der Category:Helmut Sinzinger ident sind, was aber bedeutet, dass dieser am 21. Februar 2020 gestorben ist -- da sollte man seine Seiten vermerken, bzw. sperren. lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 10:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Done. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake

Hello, I requested deletion of a category, and you deleted it. I now know that I was wrong. The category in question is Category:Photographs by Eric Vance. I think I should recreate the deleted category and move the images back. Is that O.K. with you? Krok6kola (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer in question is Vance, Eric, EPA chief photographer. Although he is an EPA photographer, he is not a DOCUMERICA photograph. I'm very sorry for my mistake. Krok6kola (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and recreated it as someone pointed out that I was wrong. I was afraid I would forget if I did not do it now. I made a redirect. If you do not agree, let me know and I will fix it the way you want. So sorry for all this. Krok6kola (talk) 00:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove misleading lines at the bottom of this article

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Christian_Lady_Photographer_Drowns.jpg

Here are the lines that need to be removed:

File usage on Commons The following page uses this file:

File:HEADLINE - "LEEDS LADY DROWNED OFF FILEY BRIGG - Photographing the Breakers" (Yorkshire post April 18, 1900).jpg (file redirect)

Thanks 175.38.37.197 07:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube upload

Hi, could you check this (Manastarsyoutubeurl (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) block user) user's upload? It seems to me copyvio? If so, please take appropriate action. Thanks. ~AntanO4task (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that the user name represent the YouTube channel. --~AntanO4task (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyvio . You can check the channel by clicking the link at the image . Manastarsyoutubeurl (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Serpulo Planet - Mindustry.jpg

This file which was deleted is a screenshot from a videogame under liscence GPL-3, which means the file I had published hadn't violated the copyright.https://github.com/Anuken/Mindustry

Please bring it back. Arkyid (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Spanish Borderlands (1921)

Hello Túrelio, there is the 1921 book by various authors and the The Spanish borderlands; a chronicle of old Florida and the Southwest (1921) by Herbert Eugene Bolton and there are the Spanish Borderlands. Since you deleted the category previously, I would appreciate if you took another look at it and let me know your thougths. Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lotje,

when I delete categories it is just for maintenance and usually only after being requested by other users. So, I am not really "involved" with that. That said, when thinking about whether a specific category is appropriate or not, usually I first look which kind of categories do exist already and then look at the category-level below the intended new category. In your case that would be Category:The Spanish Borderlands. If you judge that it is too crowed and/or too unspecific, just recreate the formerly deleted category. I leave that to your judgement. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:William-wallace.jpg

Hi, IMHO, replacing an invalid license with {{Wrong license}} doesn't help. The file just ends up in Category:Media without a license: needs history check with more work to do. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Probably I was in a hurry at that moment. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Elena (ship, 2012, Istanbul)

I'm not sure why this category was deemed "unuseful". It's always possible for ship pictures to be uploaded in the future. In any event, it looks like there are at least four images (File:Navire ELENA au port de Casablanca.jpg, File:Navire ELENA à quai.jpg, File:Navire ELENA à Casablanca.jpg, and File:Navire ELENA au port.jpg) which should have been in that category, but are currently miscategorized in a different ship (of the same name and build year). Could that be undeleted? Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clindberg,

the cat was empty and had been tagged by another user for speedy deletion. The term "unuseful" is the default-wording of CSD C2 and added automatically by the script. Undeleted now. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A while back there was a policy change that simply empty was not grounds for speedy deletion -- just obviously unuseful ones, without future prospects. Anyways, thank you :-) Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisme sournois / Sneaky vandalism

Cher Túrelio, je découvre aujourd'hui ce vandalisme sournois d’un contributeur habituel de Commons MB-one. Cette avocate des Droit de l'Homme est mal vue par l’extrême droite. Je pense que, même tardivement, il est nécessaire de sanctionner ce comportement pour le principe. Un contributeur habituel de Commons ne devrait jamais faire de tels actes de vandalisme. Avec mes remerciements,

Dear Túrelio, today I discovered this sneaky vandalism from a regular Commons contributor MB-one. This human rights lawyer is frowned upon by the far right. I think that, even belatedly, it is necessary to sanction this behavior in principle. A regular Commons contributor should never engage in such acts of vandalism. With thanks, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT : I find out that this user is an administrator. An exemplary sanction must be taken.--Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claude Truong-Ngoc,

while I don't know MB-one personally, I assume that this was an unintended, though very unfortunate misclick, as it happens also to me sometimes, though I would have corrected myself immediately. Anyway, as my colleague Yann had asked him already on his talkpage 2 days ago, I've contacted him directly and asked him to clarify this issue. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ctruongngoc, as I see now, it had already been clarified. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:أبو بيان.jpg

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Category:Ligature "TU"

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAB-500 with gliding system.jpg

Hello Turelio! In March you have rightfully deleted a stolen picture. However yesterday I contacted the original poster of this picture on the Internet, Fighterbomber, and asked to release this picture under CC Attribution 4.0, to which he agreed. (Its an account which is mentioned in the description of Fighterbomber channel as the one to contact) Can you please restore the image? You can contact me for more info if You want. F.Alexsandr (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi F.Alexsandr,

I have temp-restored the file. However, you need to correct to source- and author-entry, provided Telegram-user Fighterbomber said that he is the photographer. In addition, as I can't speak/read Russian and therefore can't verify the above linked statement by Fighterbomber, I will try to involve a Ru-speaking colleague to take care of that. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i have edited the description. F.Alexsandr (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Chrome OS 69.png

Thanks for handling the speedy deletion of this copyright violation image! There are a few more similar case images of Google ChromeOS and Google Chrome that are also falsely claimed to be the user's own work, uploaded under a free licence in violation of the copyright holder's licence (in both cases Google's Terms of Service, as linked in the deletion) and which actually show the copyrighted portions of the ChromeOS or Chrome user interface. In the past I have had other admins not understand this particular copyright violation situation and decline the speedy deletion. I was wondering if I nominated some more files in the same situation, would you would be willing to assess them also for deletion? If so, I could nominate them and list them here for you to consider each case. - Ahunt (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerrit van Honthorst - Christ Crowned with Thorns - 90.PA.26 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg not exact duplicate

Hi, you deleted File:Gerrit van Honthorst - Christ Crowned with Thorns - 90.PA.26 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg ( 3,285 × 4,250 / 19,375,850 bytes) for File:Gerrit van Honthorst (Dutch - Christ Crowned with Thorns - Google Art Project.jpg ( 3,286 × 4,251 / 3.03 MB). The file is much larger and the colors are different. It's not an exact duplicate at all! Please undelete and restore usage. Google probably "improved" the original image. I recall some very angry people from a big museum photo studio where this happened. Multichill (talk) 18:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Downtown+Gilbert-2.jpg

Hi, I created a regular DR just before you deleted it. None of the link is the source of this image. Yann (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik

Hallo Túrelio, schon wieder die nächsten regelwidrigen Neuanlagen statt Verschiebungen samt Schnelllöschungen von Kategorien, die Beiträge anderer Benutzer enthalten. Dir melde ich: Alt Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik, neu Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 by Saoutchik, weil Du gelöscht hast. (Einen anderen Fall melde ich Yann, weil er gelöscht hat.) Wie kannst Du das bereinigen? Vielleicht Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 by Saoutchik löschen, Category:Hispano-Suiza K6 Saoutchik wiederherstellen und verschieben?
Siehe auch #Category:Bugatti Type 101 s/n 101-501. --Buch-t (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hispano-Suiza I 6

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast diese Kategorie gelöscht, nachdem Finoskov für Fotos von einem der erhaltenen Fahrzeuge die separate Unterkategorie Category:Hispano-Suiza I 6 Vanvooren Pillarless berline 1924 (chassis 20-001) angelegt hatte. Die wird aber als Hauptkategorie gebraucht, in die alle vorhandenen und zukünftigen Unterkategorien zu den verschiedenen Fahrzeugen des Typs I 6 einsortiert werden. Also bitte wieder herstellen. --Buch-t (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redo your image file deletion

Hello, I see you delete my Lego truck photo. I owned this image, since now if you check in the other wiki, it’s gone, meaning that’s proof I didn’t copying it and it’s my work. If you can redo it, please do. If not, please try to otherwise I’ll contact other administrations to block you for your inappropriate act. Thank you, MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should not threaten other users, whether admin or not. Image now in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lego Bricks Truck.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

video game cover

Hello, I misstake the license of Nier Replicant cover art, how can use the Non-free video game cover license? sorry for misstake 千尋0096 (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, fair-use material is generally not allowed on Commons. Some projects, such as :en, have an exemption-policy for such material. So, you need to check whether your project has one, and then upload it locally. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Videogame covers, such as Nier Automata, is permited, but i dont know how it works, sorry. 千尋0096 (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Album covers, which is applicable to other kind of covers. If it's above threshold of originality, it's copyrighted and you need a permission from the author/artist/rights-holder. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024!

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request of a deleted image to be put back on

Hello, I've noticed you removed an image I uploaded. As I stated I've obtained this image from the social media account of Jo_the_femboy, and I've got his permission to upload it here. What can I do to get the image back up here? Do I have to provide proof?

Thanks! Elagabalus83 (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

such statements are considered insufficient. The copyright-holder needs to confirm the choosen free license directly (no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The permission needs to specify the image (URL/filename on Commons) and the license. To be sure, use this template: Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, fill-in the variables, mail it to the rights-holder and ask him, if he is willing, to sign and date it and to send it to the specified address. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shocking !

Hello. I'm shocked to see that you deleted File:Syed Imtiazuddin.jpg, the image of my late father who was a prolific orator, writer, columnist, books compiler, poet, philanthropist, activist and engineer. I have myself provided many of his images to media outlets. With his knowledge and approval I've uploaded many celeb autographs on commons. So there's no copyvio even if any pic is published elsewhere. Here is an English writeup on him, if you would like to read.

Also carefully examine File:Smiling baby boy with white-dotted red hat.jpg, childhood pic of my son's childhood bestie. If it's from another file, where's the file and how is this copyvio? Plz restore both files.--Muzammil (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Hindustanilanguage,

there is no reason to be "shocked" about a deletion on Commons, as you should well know as a long-term user.

Anyway, wrt File:Syed Imtiazuddin.jpg: it is obviously a reproduction from print and the given date (2023) is hardly the date of the original shot. So, what needs to be answered is: 1) who created the original photography (not the reproduction), and 2) when was it really shot?

The same questions wrt File:Smiling baby boy with white-dotted red hat.jpg, original photographer? and original shot-date (year)? In addition, you as the father might ask yourself whether it's prudent to publish a personal image of a family member (privacy, consent). --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think a replacement pic now suffices pic deficiency of the article for which it was intended. While guy in the other pic uploaded tons of his pics on Snapchat, no issues of privacy are breached in posting a pic I took personally. And this chap is not my son but his best friend (freund) as already stated. Anyway, I withdraw my request to undelete. Muzammil (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

An image uploaded of streamer Adin Ross in 2024 was deleted by you. I am looking to get it restored as it was correctly licensed but looked as so as it wasn't when you viewed it.

I uploaded a review in Commons:Undeletion requests as I wasn't sure what steps to do first but after looking around I was suppose to reach out via talk page first.

Here's what was said in my request.

When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from YouTube under the stated license of "Creative Commons Attribution license". Since then the YouTube channel changed the license but Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable in this manner. https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/index.php?title=Frequently_Asked_Questions&oldid=4299#What_if_I_change_my_mind.3F

The exact time the file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons shows the video was under the Creative Commons Attribution license : https://web.archive.org/web/20240501055624/https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI

Current YouTube video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UDM9p8kBIWI&t=1256s

Cxhd (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicholas Galitzine, 2024.jpg

Hi ya, could you please review this one? Many thanks:) ArturSik (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Providing requested screenshot.

Hi.

I tried to upload a picture, but got deleted with this comment as a explanation:

14:07, 21 March 2024 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:14 Heimer og folk i Stiklestad-s328.jpg (Copyright violation: Print screen from a digitalized version of a book, on the Norwegian National Library. (Source URL is possibly limited to Norwegian IP adresses, contact me for a screenshot of the entire page, proving the copyvio.) https://www.nb.no/items/7eca901565dedcb987ce7592a0c178e5?page=327) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)

I dont know how I can send you a screenshot, but the page where the map is located are on page 327 on this book "Bind, Heimer og folk i Stiklestad, av Ottar Moholt og Solveig Ness, Bygdeboknemnda 2005" found under "Fullversjon" in this link [12]https://www.verdalsboka.no/nedlasting/

If needed I have contacts with the author of the book. He say that the map is free to use, but do we need to proof this? Thanks. Pederw95 (talk) 09:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lithografiestein zum Titelblatt von David Poppers Spanische Tänze

Gegenstück (entspiegel): Lithographiestein für *Spanische Tänze* No. 2

Hallo, Túrelio. Vielen Dank, dass Du das nebenstehende Fotos des Lithographiesteins elektronisch entspiegelt hast. elektronisch gedreht hast. Es wird dadurch für Anna Normalverbraucherin lesbar. Zur Visualisierung der Arbeit des Lithographen benötigen wir jedoch insbesondere das Original, die Ursprungsversion, um sichtbar zu machen, dass die ausführenden Künstler und Lithographen spiegelverkehrt lesen, schreiben und gravieren können mussten. Darf ich Dich bitten, neben Deiner entspiegelten Version (Danke!) auch das Original wieder sichtbar zu machen? Dank für die gemeinschaftliche Arbeit sendet Dir Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Bernd,

ich habe die Datei einfach auf die Originalfassung zurückgesetzt, in der Annahme, dass das deinem Wunsch entspricht. Außerdem habe ich in der Beschreibung als zusätzlichen Eintrag |Other_versions= eingefügt, mit einem Link auf die oben von dir verlinkte gespiegelte Fassung. Den Eintrag kannst du aber wieder entfernen falls das nicht deiner Systematik entspricht. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any sanctions of wikimedia of me?

even if unknowingly, seeing a mistake. Will there any sanctions? absolutely i not abuse using Trbatuhankara (talk) 10:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you asking? At least for Commons, I am not aware of any "sanctions". It seems you uploaded some images, which were found to be unfree. You then discussed it with a patroler. We assume you uploaded these images in error or without knowing they are still copyrighted. So far, this would not merit any sanction. However, for future uploads, if they are not your own work, first try to check or ask experienced users whether the upload would be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am new for wikimedia and learning this. thanks for answer. trying be careful Trbatuhankara (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Ugo Biggeri

I apologize, but the license for this photo is CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 DEED, as indicated at the bottom of the page https://valori.it/numeri-crescita-banca-etica/. If I'm not mistaken, this should allow for its use, correct? Thank you Homeless (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I had written already in the note on your talkpage, NC (= no commercial use) is a restriction, which is not accepted on Commons and Wikipedia, see COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image of mine you deleted

I recently uploaded a work by Adrian Nichols of a photo of the Eurotunnel Class 0031. You deleted it under the pretext of free use files not being allowed on Wikipedia, but I was given permission to upload the file by Adrian himself. Surely, if the original uploader gave me permission, uploading shouldn't be a problem, no?

-WaterDuck WaterDuck8 5741 (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, assuming you are referring to File:Eurotunnel Class 0031 No. 0035.jpg: you did not provide the source; writing "Flickr" is useless, as nobody can evaluate the source with this information. Another editor took the pain to search for the image on Flickr and found it at https://www.flickr.com/photos/36034969@N08/14328654844 and with "All rights reserved". So, where is said permission now? Thereafter, an IP (likely you) changed the alleged CC-Zero to "fair use". However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The permission was located in the comments, I'd asked for permission to upload it and he said yes, so long as I credited him as the author, which I did.

h

https://www.flickr.com/photos/36034969@N08/14328654844/#comment72157720355710094 WaterDuck8 5741 (talk) 12:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's something. But, it's not sufficient, as "permission for use in Wikipedia" is not an accepted substitute for a free license. Per our policy COM:L, uploads to Commons need to be freely usable, even for commercial purposes and for derivatives. Recommended licenses, which allow these uses, are CC-BY and CC-BY-SA for example. So, you might contact the Flickr-photographer again (best on a private channel, if available) and ask him if he would be willing to do this. If he agrees, but wants to have the image on Flickr still under "all rights reserved", there are 2 ways to do this. 1) He could change the license on Flickr for at least 1 hour at a prespecified point of time to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. Our Flickr-Review-bot could then read the license from his Flickr-site and record it here on Commons. Thereafter he could change the license on Flickr back to ARR. However, this would make it necessary that he tell us/you at what time he would do this, as we then would need to "activate" said bot. 2) The other way would be that he sends to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org an email from his Flickr-account stating that he releases said image under the CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CHE Céligny COA var.svg

Hi, can you please restore this file? It's not a duplicate, it's meant to be a variation of File:CHE Céligny COA.svg using a different palette. There's been numerous overwrites so I don't know in what state the file was when it was deleted but it's meant to be this version: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/7b/20240519165059%21CHE_Céligny_COA.svg. Thanks in advance. - Espandero (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But you were the one who tagged it for deletion per "{{SD|Variation of [[:File:CHE Céligny COA.svg|CHE Céligny COA.svg]], not usefull.}}". --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't remember asking for the deletion but given what's going on the other file it's best we keep both. Sorry for the confusion. - Espandero (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please stop deleting (flag) redirects

Hi. Please stop deleting the (flag) redirects, they exist for a good reason, and the redirects are within policy. That we have a user who now thinks it is a good idea to nominate them is the problem, and that is exacerbated when you actually do them. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2

Please delete the Files. The first one is misattributed. The second one is an unsuccessfully uploaded copy Воскресенский Петр (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How are you finding duplicates so quickly?

Hi, Túrelio. Thank you for deleting my upload that was a duplicate. Flickr2commons used to check for duplicates, but that does not appear to work any more. How did you find the duplicate so quickly? Is there a duplicate-finding tool that I don't know about? That would be very useful! Thanks for any information. — hike395 (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hike395, this would be a perfect template to tell a magical ability of admins. ;-) But, no. It wasn't even me who detected the duplicate. It was the work of the bot User:OptimusPrimeBot. It detects and then tags such files. Only then comes an admin and likely deletes the file. As I don't mass-upload from Flickr, I am not aware of a currently working tool/bot that warns of duplicate at the time of upload to Commons. However, you might ask at COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just found that Flickypedia checks for duplicates (I just tested it), so I'll use that from now on. Thanks for your help! — hike395 (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To answer the "how": my bot parses Special:ListDuplicatedFiles every 15 minutes (but the page itself is updated only every three days). If there is less than 200 files in Category:Duplicate, it fills the category up to 200 files with the more recent files listed on Special:ListDuplicatedFiles. The code is here. vip (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transjakarta BRT Route 6B Icon.png

Hello!

Something weird happened here. The redirect target redirects back to the original. Jonteemil (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same with File:Transjakarta BRT Route 9C Icon.png. Jonteemil (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what happened here. Anyway, I've reverted myself in File:Transjakarta BRT Route 9C Icon.png and File:Transjakarta BRT Route 6B Icon.png has already been corrected by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mr Ghulam Asghar.JPG

The file is unused and is likely covered under pictures of non-contributors, and a speedy delete candidate. I guess I just feel a frisson of annoyance at an uploader treating us as his personal filing system. I think I am correct in my assertion there, and I "just don't want to accede to his request" 😈. However I feel it is probably right to do so. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 08:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for my late reply. I felt the same way. In between, it has been deleted by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File License Review

Hi! Hope you are doing well1 Please review lincese of File:Mansoor Ali Shah.png. ThanK You :) Wallu2 (talk) 14:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wallu2 I notice this and added the licence found at the source to the file description: Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed) 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I reviewed it now. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before I make a fool of myself(!)

Please look at File:Harihar Singh Mardaraj Bhramarabara Roy.jpg, which appears to me to have the characteristics of a copyvio (source). I cannot find a thing at the declared source site to verify permission here, However, does the Odisha Assembly source grant it the automatic ability for editors to upload it here? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while you are correct wrt the evidence, the website, where this image is said to be taken from (though I couldn't really find it), states indeed[13] "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". As the depicted is dead since 1994 and due to the low quality, it's unlikely that an assumed copyright-holder would file claims in the case odishaassembly.nic.in's claim is bogus. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PTT login screen.png

Sorry to bother you. I checked the website's licence and the correct permission should be GPL. Can you undelete it? Rinna (Talk) 10:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I went to https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ID_Getback/M.1603329678.A.726.html , but did not see any license/permission statement. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page is for people who forgot their password. Please see https://www.ptt.cc/index.source.html, the login screen is a part of ptt's source code and it's under GPL (https://github.com/ptt/pttbbs), just like File:Pttlogin.png. Rinna (Talk) 11:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've restored it, but you need to add the correct license-template, not CC-0. --Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack by user

A user made personal attack 3 times and claims that "he doesn't care" [14] [15] [16]. Boneless Pizza! (talk) 12:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked for 3 days. However, you should also not troll them [17],[18]. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're the one who started, thou I would take that advice. Boneless Pizza! (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right to delete duplicates

Hi,

Is it possible to acquire the necessary rights to replace duplicate files as you have done here with the maps of municipalities in Akershus (your work here)? I am considering restarting my work with maps, and have many older files I want to replace. Worldlydev (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have plenty of uploads to the Commons and have made quite a few contributions as well. Uploads: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles?limit=500&user=Worldlydev Worldlydev (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I see that I would need administrator rights for this. Please let me know if there is another way. This is really the only tool I am interested in. Thanks for your time. Worldlydev (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Worldlydev, sorry for my late reply. Indeed, processing duplicates requires admin-rights, as a file is deleted. However, every user can nominate duplicates, ideally using the template {{duplicate|<targetfile>}}, which needs to be placed onto the to-be-deleted/replaced file. This template is linked to a script, which replaces the uses of the to-be-deleted file on all Wikimedia projects by the "target-file". Duplicate-nominations are usually processed within a day, as they are speedy-request. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query from CSM269

Hi, I saw some users were trying to upload contents (mainly photographs) of members of Lok Sabha, but were deleted due to copyright infringement. If I get a consent from the Lok Sabha secretariat for the permission to upload, can I upload it? If so, how will I start the process with? Regards, CSMention269 (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes to your 1st question. One important caveat: content uploaded to Commons needs to be under a free license, per our policy COM:L. It is not accepted if it is only a "permission for Wikipedia".

So, if the rights-holder is willing to release the work under a free license, you can upload the file to Commons and then immediately prepare a permission-text, using the boxed text-portion on Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, in which you should enter the filename (or full URL) of the uploaded file and the name of the choosen license. Then send the completed permission-text to the rightsholder and ask them to read, sign and date it, and to send it back directly (no forwarding) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Their sent-in permission/email will not be published, but treated confidentially by our OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delaation request

Hello, please summarize this deletion request, I have a request to delete it for privacy reasons Mahmood baghdadi (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DrinkBox Studios logo alt.png

Hi, why was File:DrinkBox Studios logo alt.png deleted as a non-free logo? The image was licensed directly from the creator and linked to an OTRS ticket to prove it. czar 10:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czar, oops, I hadn't seen the OTRS-template. Restored and moved the template upwards. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wasserzeichen

@Túrelio: Guten Tag Túrelio,
Könntest Du bitte die Dateien in dieser temporär angelegten Kategorie:
Category:Orchidaceae in Belgium Dafejo
überprüfen, ob die Wasserzeichen dieser Bildern entfernt werden können.
Ich kenne die Regeln leider nicht.
Dank und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.Category:Le parcours de monsieur EVRARD Daniel.

Hi Orchi,

ist deine Frage technisch oder rechtlich gemeint? Am besten wäre es natürlich, wenn man den Hochlader davon überzeugen könnte, die Fotos ohne WZ, dafür aber mit vernünftigen Metadaten hochzuladen. Letztere haben sie nämlich nicht, sondern nur einen Facebook-Code, der früher oder später zu einem Copyvio-Verdacht führen wird. Eine andere Alternative wäre es, "unsichtbare" WZ (z.B. mit SignMyImage[19]) zu benutzen, weil diese die Nutzbarkeit der Fotos nicht einschränken. Rechtlich ist die Entfernung von Urheberrechts-bezogenen Wasserzeichen (wie in diesem Fall) strittig; auf Commons:Watermarks#Legal issues with the removal of watermarks findest du ein Gutachten der WMF-Rechtsabteilung, das von der Entfernung abrät, und ein deutsches OLG-Urteil, das in der Entfernung eine Verletzung (und damit Ungültigmachung) der CC-Lizenz sieht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio:

Guten Tag Túrelio,

Vielen Dank für Deine ausführliche Antwort.

Meine Vermutung, diesem Thema nicht gewachsen zu sein, hat sich mit Deinen Hinweisen und Erläuterungen bestätigt.

User:Evrard Daniel hat offensichlich alle seine Bilder mit einem Wasserzeichen markiert.

Für mich ist das Thema (vor allen Dingen: rechtlich) zu schwierig und ich werde in Zukunft keine weiteren Aktivitäten bei diesem Thema unternehmen.

Vielen Dank und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your deletion of Category:Maps of Palestine on stamps

Hello,

You deleted Category:Maps of Palestine on stamps on 22 April 2024 as empty. I'd just like to point out that this was the result of disruptive edits such as this and this, although they could have been done in good faith.

I guess we must frequently see overly enthousiastic editors switching the words "Israel" and "Palestine" one for the other, in both directions. I just had to look into mirror Category:Maps of Israel on stamps to find content that shouldn't have been there. So do you think a quick check of this kind would be appropriate before deleting a category with either "Israel" or "Palestine" that comes up as empty? Place Clichy 11:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clichy,

sorry for my late reply, I'm currently in holidays and have limited online-access. I'll try to delay performing deletion of speedy-tagged categories. --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muss man auch mal sagen

Ein Dankeschön für dein Engagement. Gruß -- Bwag (talk) 10:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, so, fast

Hi, I have just provide the correct license for this file there is no options in the upload procedure to set the right license, so, I need to edit after the upload. Please make a review and let me know. Regards. --Marcric (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ok. I`ve changed it to "wrong license", which does not result in speedy-deletion. IMO, CC-0 is not appropriate here. Please take a look at older uploads of the same series and use the accepted PD-tag. It might be PD-US oder PD-old. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Túrelio, I have based my decision in the logical (IMHO) license option made by someone else in a similar situation here in 2008. The product being announced, the Red Ryder BB Gun, was produced between 1940 and 1942, so it is fair to suppose the ad is from the same period. And in the upload procedure there is no option for other licenses then the creative commons ones anymore, so, the changes must be done after the upload. I was just trying to edit and update the permission parameter when received you notification. Let me know any decision, because this file is important in both contexts the w:Red Ryder and w:Daisy Outdoor Products articles. Regards. 🤜🤛 --Marcric (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove deletion dicussion

Hi again, Túrelio, Sorry, I had been a bit grouchy last time I'd talk to you because all those English Wiki folks who had blocked me, and sure, I did nothing, even if you think I did it. Now a whole bunch of blocked computers can't be used in the computer lab at my school for Wiki, not my fault. Anyway, I had just provided for the following files and this to be be reviewed. Please let me know soon. Thanks, MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chances, if you could recovered the deleted files* I had made, that would be awesome for me to change the wrong license. If not, that's okay. *P.S I don't have the photos files on my PC, so yeah. MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 01:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MinecraftPlayer321,

I'm currently in holidays and have limited online-access. The Zuru-log might be ok. Wrt the Lego Bricks Truck it's unfortunate that nobody has commented at the DR. A DR should not be closed by the same user (me), who had opened it. --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My picture is not taken from that page tho

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=356385554 the image I uploaded is from a document I procured from my btl profile. It's the same info, but it's not taken from there. It's a screenshot from a document available only to me. Benderbr (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Hello I have uploaded a new photo of this file with higher quality, if possible, please delete this file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat-production.png

And if possible, delete this file as well https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production_by_country_2022.jpg

substitute of file https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corn_production.png Matinmatinmm (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file

Why'd you delete File:Special Education school in the Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation.jpeg under G3? I only blurred out the faces as a privacy protection. Ogundareibrahim123 (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ogundareibrahim123,

the image had been G3-tagged by User:ДолбоЯщер, which might have been not the optimal choise. However, I would have deleted it as being out of COM:SCOPE, as surely nobody would have used it. In addition, putting a "handycapped"-icon onto the faces of these people might be well seen a personality-rights violation, even if that was not your intention. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Of CC0 1.0 Image

Hello, I am writing to ask why this image was deleted: c:File:Michael Lucas Puerto Vallarta 2023 (Photo By Mano Martinez).jpg

The file has a CC0 1.0 license applied to it.

Michael Lucas (Puerto Vallarta, 2024) by Mano Martinez is marked with CC0 1.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

https://www.lucasentertainment.com/meet-the-lucasmen/michael-lucas-during-a-puerto-vallarta-2023-production-by-mano-martinez/

~~~~ BlackNYer (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlackNYer,

my bad. Seems I overlooked the license on the source-site. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated image

Guten Abend Túrelio. I would like to ask you a question. Yesterday I mistakenly uploaded an image that I had already uploaded a year ago (here the original and here the repeated version). What is the procedure to delete the second image? Dank im Voraus. CFA1877 (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CFA1877, you want to have File:Huelva - 49960418776.jpg, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's right. CFA1877 (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank ;) CFA1877 (talk) 15:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MIstaken deletion of File:Codigo-aflaf-placa-sinalizacao-estado-sao-paulo-lei-13541-proibido-fumar-lei-antifumo.svg

I'm pretty sure this and that was a mistake - the file is indeed a dupe of File:Test.svg, but only for now. Undo it, please - Gabuxae (talk) 08:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes. This resulted from an erroneous dupe-tagging by the dupe-bot. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.. Reverted one more instance - Gabuxae (talk) 07:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken categorical deletion

The files that were originally posted to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 20 August 2024 (Preseason) were deleted after a move to Category:Washington Commanders at New York Jets, 10 August 2024 (Preseason). Dissident93 (talk) 15:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give an example for the allegedly wrongly deleted files? --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preseason Week 1- Commanders at Jets - 53916585297.jpg Dissident93 (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you had tagged it for speedy-deletion by yourself, which I have performed under the G7-rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that would delete the old category and not the files tagged within it. Dissident93 (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, 41 files restored. Next time, be a bit more careful please. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Young-kyoung.png

Hi,

Is this a re-uploaded image of File:Lee_Young-kyoung.jpg ? 0x0a (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

license

Hello Túrelio,
[20] the license is at the bottome of description of source page..
--Gpkp (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Seems I overlooked it as it's placed at the deepest end of that page. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Túrelio. I got worried as there were 50+ uploads from the same source with a possibility of getting nominated. --Gpkp (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+++Regards

Dear Turelio,

Thank you for your attention to detail on Wikipedia. However, I would like to clarify a couple of points regarding the removal of my profile picture.

The image I used is a promotional touristic photograph of the Kingdom of Spain and, as such, is under a license that allows its free use without copyright restrictions. Therefore, it does not infringe any laws or regulations.

It is common to find images used in various contexts, including personal profiles on platforms like Wikipedia. In fact, your profile picture can also be found on other websites.

I invite you to review the following page for more information on the license of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EselEttalerMuehle_1092.jpg

I hope this explanation clarifies the situation.

Thank you very much for your time and understanding. AM AtlasMarck (talk) 22:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AtlasMarck,

assuming you are relating to File:F1jWKFSX-oAE-9HB.jpg: you uploaded it on August 7th, while it was uploaded to gay.it already in June (https://www.gay.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/gran-canaria-10-borghi-da-visitare-1200x675.jpg). Nevertheless, you claimed it as "own work". In addition, your conclusion "promotional touristic photograph" thereby "allows ... free use without copyright restrictions" is without base in fact. If taken as fact, it needs evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erste Bank Open

Hi, ich hatte nicht vor, das File, dass der verifizierte Benutzer Emotion Group unter seinem Benutzernamen hochgeladen hat, jetzt gelöscht zu bekommen, weil er sich in den Exif-Metadaten e|motion schreibt und ich das (ohne Auftrag) leichtsinnig in die Autor-Information übernommen habe. Ich habe eigentlich keinen Zweifel, dass das dasselbe ist. Ailura (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:Ailura,

Danke für das zwischenzeitliche Verlinken der betroffenen Dateien. Da ich relativ viel lösche, ist es ziemlich mühsam, das über die Log-Liste herauszufinden, zumal wenn die Löschung schon einige Stunden zurückliegt. Es geht also um:

Wenn du den Eindruck hast, dass die Uploads in "guter Absicht" erfolgt sind, weil du den Uploader schon "kennst" oder betreust, dann bitte ihn doch einfach, für beide Dateien eine formelle Genehmigung, idealerweise vom tatsächlichen Fotografen an OTRS zu schicken. Wenn er das zusagt, kann ich die beiden Dateien entlöschen und mit OTRS-pending markieren. Grundsätzlich ist es so, dass auch bei verifizierten Benutzern nicht einfach davon ausgegangen wird, dass die Rechte für alle Uploads schon vorliegen (hatte ich früher auch mal angenommen, wurde aber eines besseren belehrt). --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gelöschte Files zu finden, wenn man keine erweiterten Rechte hat, ist auch nicht so einfach. Ich frag mal an. Nur nochmal zum Verständnis: Wenn der Benutzer verifiziert ist, muss er für Werke, die er als eigene angibt und bei denen er u.a. in den Exif-Metadaten steht trotzdem eine formelle Genehmigung schicken? Ailura (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, genau; mit Ausnahme der Anmerkung zu den Exif-Daten, das hatte ich selbst noch nicht. Das kommt von den OTRS- bzw. VRT-Kollegen (zähle ich nicht dazu), die sich um Genehmigungen kümmern; ggf. kannst du vorab, z.B. Kollegen User:Krd, wegen der Exif-Besonderheit nachfragen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi, All three accounts are belong to (Sockpuppetry) one person. This person are uploading promotional files in Wikipedia. Yesterday all uploads were deleted by you. But today user uploaded again the same files with different names. Please block all three accounts in commons and delete all new promotional uploads

deleted file are (my 21 August edtions)

Thanks.[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IceCool.png

Hi
You ~~deleted~~ this image with stated reason being: "twitter doesn't appear to license freely".
The twemojis are released under a CC-BY license. (If you had looked at my latest edit on that page, you would have found out about it and maybe you wouldn't have deleted it.)
regards
Emdosis (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Emdosis: Sorry, I had not seen that page. Barring a reply here from Túrelio, please post this on COM:UDEL. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Sorry, I had overlooked the license at github. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good 👍. Emdosis (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unberechtigte Löschung

Hallo,

du hast heute ein hochgeladenes Foto "BONEZ MC Primary.jpg" mit folgendem Grund gelöscht "Copyright violation: https://www.reddit.com/user/Bonez-MC/comments/bp3t65/luv_him/" ... der Upload des Fotos erfolgte mit Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst. Warum löscht man dieses Foto und gibt als Quelle ein Bild bei Reddit an welches eine Urheberrechtsverletzung ist? Wir fordern die Widerherstellung und zukünftige Unterlassung von derartigen Mutwilligen Handlungen. Gib doch beim nächsten Mal eine Quelle an die auch den Account des Urhberrechtsinhabers zeigt und nicht die eines X-beliebigen Fake Accounts. Jaidenkioken (talk) 13:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

du hattest das Foto File:BONEZ MC Primary.jpg 1. heute hochgeladen, 2. als urheberrechtlich dein eigenes Werk deklariert und 3. angegeben es sei vom 26. August 2024.

Von einem anderen Benutzer wurde es aber auf Reddit[21] gefunden, wo es bereits vor 5 Jahren hochgeladen wurde. Damit ist zumindest deine Datierung als falsch erwiesen. Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber. Gemäß den Commons-Spielregeln steht dein Upload daher unter URV-Verdacht und wurde gelöscht (COM:PRP).

Dein Wording "wir fordern ..." und "Zustimmung und Wissen des Urheberrechtsinhabers / des Künstlers selbst" legt zudem nahe, dass du nicht selbst der Urheber (Fotograf) bist, sondern vermutlich im Auftrag des Abgebildetenen (Agentur) tätig bist. In solchen Fällen ist es erforderlich, dass der Urheberrechtsinhaber gegenüber dem Commons:Volunteer Response Team (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org) eine formale Erklärung zur Urheberschaft /zum Nutzungsrecht abgibt und die gewählte freie Lizenz bestätigt. Diese Erklärung muss vom Urheber oder Urheberrechtsinhaber direkt an die o.g. Adresse gesandt werden (also keine Weiterleitung). Eine (deutschsprachige) Textvorlage für diese Erklärung findest du hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). --Túrelio (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist schon alarmierend zu sehen welche Unwissenheit hier zu Tage gefördert wird. "Derjenige, der ein Werk als erster publiziert, gilt prima facie als Urheber." Diese Aussage ist komplett falsch und basiert offensichtlich auf gefährlichen Halbwissen. Der Urheber ist derjenige der das Werk erstellt hat. Es ist dabei irrelevant ob das Werk veröffentlicht wurde oder nicht. Jaidenkioken (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spar dir deine Belehrungen. Ich habe dir geschildert was nach unseren Regeln erforderlich ist, damit das Bild wiederhergestellt werden kann, werde mit dir aber nicht weiter kommunizieren, zumal ich im Genehmigungsprozess auf Commons nicht involviert bin.--Túrelio (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool

Since a few days Croptool is not working for me. When I go to the image I want to crop, it just leads me to the "Enter the URL or filename for an image you would like to crop." page and when I type the file name again, it just gets stuck in "File:«name of the file.jpg» found on «commons.wikimedia.org». Nothing like this happened before to me. I have tried everything, clearing the browser data and restarting but without any success. Could you please assist me in this matter or let me know what can be done. Regards JayFT047 (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually just noticed, now it is only happening with this pic where I want to extract a cropped image: File:Pakistan national football team group picture.jpg JayFT047 (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JayFT047,

sorry, but I never used this CropTool and therefore don't have any experience with it. I use the crop function of the freeware IrfanView[22]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weirdly it just started working now... Thanks for the recommendation anyways. Just one thing, I just uploaded this screenshot from a video from Youtube under free license. However, I have changed the aspect ratio as it is quite unfavourable because it's recorded by phone and I'm unsure if that will affect the YoutubeReview check. Could you please review it. Cheers and thank you very much JayFT047 (talk) 22:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see whether File:Dr. Babalanda Joan Peace.jpg is the same as en:File:Joan Peace Babalanda.JPG? The same person uploaded both files and they might've simply reuploaded the same file locally to English Wikipedia after you deleted it from Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly Please see w:en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 August 27 where I have followed the to enWiki and suggested deletion 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran

Thanks for deleting File:Chica con sombrero.jpg; however, I think you missed my comment "see also other images in Category:Rodrigo Beltran". Please could you check and delete the copyvios? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now all images tagged with no-perm or copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving and deletion of Category:Categories of Belarus by district

Hello! You've deleted Category:Categories of Belarus by district which content was previously moved to Category:Districts of Belarus by topic without any discussion. I don't see any categories named «Districts of <Country> by topic», but plenty named «Categories of <Country> by district» (Azerbaijan, Germany, Poland etc.) Also I think category was not well moved as new category was created instead of moving previous category, so prevoius categorisation and history was lost. Should these actions be reconsidered? Red Winged Duck (talk) 10:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

the deletion was performed on request by User:Adamant1. So, while I have no problem to undelete it etc., I would recommend you to discuss the issue with said user in order that you both eventually come to an agreement. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:JoshuaHabkaBio-Hacking.jpg"

Hello! Shouldn't this image be approprite to remain on the commons since on the web-site it says that the images have the Attribution 4.0 license as long as they do not have one of those QR codes?

Thanks! StructuredWookie (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "File:Motorola moto e (2020) Front.jpg"

Hello, this image was deleted due to an image displayed on the phone screen, but even as the central focus, you can just redact the "Friday night Funkin'" asset from the phone's display. the primary purpose of the image is to show off the specific phone model. 2603:8001:8400:DC34:8D91:1C06:45FB:BE32 05:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But, is there really no better image of that model? I mean, if we remove the displayed icon, the remaining image shows near-to nothing. So, we can redact the icon, but is the resulting image worth the effort? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I recall it only took the portions of the screen near the sides and the rest of the image remains intact 204.100.235.147 16:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found this photo on Flickr. At least the image in the middle would pose no problem. The left one would need further evaluation due to the screen. But not sure whether it's the right model. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast

Restore Category:1943 establishments in Ternopil Oblast. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1965 establishments in Ternopil Oblast --Микола Василечко (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Category:1943 establishments in Ukraine by region, Category:1943 in Ternopil Oblast, Category:1965 establishments in Ukraine by region. --Микола Василечко (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gefälschte Bilder

Guten Abend Túrelio. Mal sehen, auf es:wiki wurde ein Scherz entdeckt. Hier in Commons gibt es Bilder über das vermeintliche Thema, aber man gibt keine Quellen an und ich vermute, dass es sich um gefälschte Bilder handelt. Dann... was können wir in diesem Fall tun? CFA1877 (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFA1877,

Danke für den Hinweis. Auf die Schnelle habe ich die 3 Bilder jetzt erst einmal mit {{Fact}} markiert und auf der jeweiligen Disku ein Link nach :es hinterlassen. Morgen werde ich für alle 3 einen LA stellen, in dem dann ggf. die Indizienlage diskutiert werden kann. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prima. Danke dir. CFA1877 (talk) 20:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Намдаков Даши Бальжанович.jpg

Hello! Is this my download? I just don't remember it. If it's really mine, can I have the text part? Insider (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, it was, though you had cropped it only.

|description=

Русский: Намдаков Даши Бальжанович

|date=2003-10-08 17:30:36 |source=File:Выставка Даши Намдакова.jpg |author=Роман Емельяненко (original), Insider (crop)

The original image had been deleted already 5 years ago. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I get it, apparently someone asked me to do it. Thank you. Insider (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]