An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish, and had pleaded not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish, and had pleaded not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2207824 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2416 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 888071178 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1961 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Hamilton v. Alabama, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1961 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Hamilton v. Alabama (en)
dbp:holding
  • Absence of counsel for petitioner at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Hamilton v. Alabama (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Douglas (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 52 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 368 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamilton was charged in an Alabama court with breaking and entering a dwelling at night with intent to ravish, and had pleaded not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Hamilton v. Alabama (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy