dbo:abstract
|
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright. Litigation began in 2013 after Carl Malamud published the OCGA on Public.Resource.Org (PRO). The state of Georgia filed a lawsuit in 2015. In March 2017, a federal court in the Northern District of Georgia ruled in the state's favor, after which in 2018 the Eleventh Circuit reversed the ruling. Both Georgia and PRO appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments in December 2019. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 31868 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-12-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:cornell
| |
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
|
- Thomas (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
|
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:first
|
- Andy (en)
- Debora (en)
- Joseph P. (en)
- Shyamkrishna (en)
|
dbp:fullname
|
- Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- Legal annotations that are created by legislatures are ineligible for copyright. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
|
- Breyer (en)
- Alito; Breyer (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh (en)
|
dbp:journal
|
- IDEA (en)
- Colum. L. Rev. Forum (en)
- J. Copyright Soc'y (en)
- Mitchell Hamline L. Rev. (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:last
|
- Taylor (en)
- Halbert (en)
- Liu (en)
- Balganesh (en)
|
dbp:litigants
|
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oralargument
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:page
|
- 1 (xsd:integer)
- 328 (xsd:integer)
- 397 (xsd:integer)
- 977 (xsd:integer)
|
dbp:parallelcitations
|
- 140 (xsd:integer)
- 172800.0
|
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:title
|
- Expanding the Public Domain after Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org., Inc. (en)
- Who's Afraid of the Common Law? Georgia V. Public.Resource.Org and the Supreme Court's Recent "Straightforward" Copyright Jurisprudence (en)
- Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law Georgia v. Public Resource Org, Inc., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (en)
- Long Live the Common Law of Copyright!: Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and the Debate over Judicial Role in Copyright (en)
|
dbp:url
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:volume
|
- 47 (xsd:integer)
- 61 (xsd:integer)
- 67 (xsd:integer)
- 121 (xsd:integer)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dbp:year
|
- 2020 (xsd:integer)
- 2021 (xsd:integer)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |