An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright. Litigation began in 2013 after Carl Malamud published the OCGA on Public.Resource.Org (PRO). The state of Georgia filed a lawsuit in 2015. In March 2017, a federal court in the Northern District of Georgia ruled in the state's favor, after which in 2018 the Eleventh Circuit reversed the ruling. Both Georgia and PRO appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments in December 2019. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 61016391 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 31868 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1092668348 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2019 (xsd:integer)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2020 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Thomas (en)
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:docket
  • 18 (xsd:integer)
dbp:first
  • Andy (en)
  • Debora (en)
  • Joseph P. (en)
  • Shyamkrishna (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Legal annotations that are created by legislatures are ineligible for copyright. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Breyer (en)
  • Alito; Breyer (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh (en)
dbp:journal
  • IDEA (en)
  • Colum. L. Rev. Forum (en)
  • J. Copyright Soc'y (en)
  • Mitchell Hamline L. Rev. (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:last
  • Taylor (en)
  • Halbert (en)
  • Liu (en)
  • Balganesh (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:page
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
  • 328 (xsd:integer)
  • 397 (xsd:integer)
  • 977 (xsd:integer)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 140 (xsd:integer)
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:title
  • Expanding the Public Domain after Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org., Inc. (en)
  • Who's Afraid of the Common Law? Georgia V. Public.Resource.Org and the Supreme Court's Recent "Straightforward" Copyright Jurisprudence (en)
  • Copyright Law Cannot Copyright Law Georgia v. Public Resource Org, Inc., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (en)
  • Long Live the Common Law of Copyright!: Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and the Debate over Judicial Role in Copyright (en)
dbp:url
dbp:uspage
  • ___ (en)
dbp:usvol
  • 590 (xsd:integer)
dbp:volume
  • 47 (xsd:integer)
  • 61 (xsd:integer)
  • 67 (xsd:integer)
  • 121 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbp:year
  • 2020 (xsd:integer)
  • 2021 (xsd:integer)
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding "whether the government edicts doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—works that lack the force of law, such as the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated" (OCGA). On April 27, 2020, the Court ruled 5–4 that the OCGA cannot be copyrighted because the OCGA's annotations were "authored by an arm of the legislature in the course of its legislative duties"; thus the Court found that the annotations fall under the government edicts doctrine and are ineligible for copyright. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Georgia, et al., Petitioners v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy