An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to exclude a homosexual person from membership in spite of a state law requiring equal treatment of homosexuals in public accommodations. More generally, the court ruled that a private organization such as the BSA may exclude a person from membership when "the presence of that person affects in a significant way the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints". In a five to four decision, the Supreme Court ruled that opposition to homosexuality is part of BSA's "expressive message" and that allowing homosexuals as adult leaders would interfe

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob die im 1. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten festgeschriebene Versammlungsfreiheit privaten Organisationen wie den Boy Scouts of America erlaubt, homosexuellen Männern eine Mitgliedschaft zu verweigern. (de)
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to exclude a homosexual person from membership in spite of a state law requiring equal treatment of homosexuals in public accommodations. More generally, the court ruled that a private organization such as the BSA may exclude a person from membership when "the presence of that person affects in a significant way the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints". In a five to four decision, the Supreme Court ruled that opposition to homosexuality is part of BSA's "expressive message" and that allowing homosexuals as adult leaders would interfere with that message. The ruling reversed a decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court that had determined that New Jersey's public accommodations law required the BSA to readmit assistant Scoutmaster James Dale, who had come out and whom the BSA had expelled from the organization for that reason. Subsequently, the BSA lifted their bans on gay scouts and gay leaders in 2013 and 2015, respectively. (en)
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, est un procès qui se tint devant la Cour suprême des États-Unis au printemps 2000, annulant la décision de la Cour suprême du New Jersey, qui avait forcé l'organisation scoute Boy Scouts of America (BSA) à réintégrer dans ses effectifs un assistant au chef-scout nommé James Dale. (fr)
  • ボーイスカウトアメリカ連盟対デール事件(ボーイスカウトアメリカれんめいたいデールじけん、Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale)530 U.S. 640 (2000)は、2000年6月28日にアメリカ連邦最高裁判所が、公共施設で同性愛者を平等に扱うことを定めた州法があることにかかわらず、憲法が保障する結社の自由により、ボーイスカウトアメリカ連盟 (BSA)が同性愛者を会員から除外することを認める判決を出した事件。BSAといった民間団体は、「その人物の存在がその団体の公的または私的な見解を主張する力に重大な影響を与える」場合は、その人物を会員から除外することができると判断された。5対4の票差で、連邦最高裁判所は同性愛への反対はBSAの「表現活動」の一部であり、成人の同性愛者をリーダーに置くことは、その表現活動を妨害することになると判決した。 (ja)
  • 美國童軍訴戴爾案(英語:Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale), U.S. 640 (2000),是美國最高法院在2000年6月28日的里程碑案件,法院裁定美國童軍(BSA)這種私人團體有憲法提供的結社自由權,當「該人的存在以一種顯著的方式,影響該團體倡導公共或私人觀點的能力」時,得以排除其會籍。以五對四的票數,最高法院判決同性戀不得入會的立場是美國童軍「表達的訊息」,而同性戀作為成人領袖將干擾該訊息。該案推翻了的判決,其判定紐澤西州的公共場合法(英語:public accommodations law)規定美國童軍須重新接納被組織驅逐出去的公開同性戀童軍團長。 (zh)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 154680 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 16735 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1075606673 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2000 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2000 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Souter (en)
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Boy Scouts of America and Monmouth Council, et al., Petitioners v. James Dale (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A private organization is allowed, under certain criteria, to exclude a person from membership through their First Amendment right to freedom of association in spite of state antidiscrimination laws. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
  • Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 640 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 530 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall zur Frage, ob die im 1. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten festgeschriebene Versammlungsfreiheit privaten Organisationen wie den Boy Scouts of America erlaubt, homosexuellen Männern eine Mitgliedschaft zu verweigern. (de)
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, est un procès qui se tint devant la Cour suprême des États-Unis au printemps 2000, annulant la décision de la Cour suprême du New Jersey, qui avait forcé l'organisation scoute Boy Scouts of America (BSA) à réintégrer dans ses effectifs un assistant au chef-scout nommé James Dale. (fr)
  • ボーイスカウトアメリカ連盟対デール事件(ボーイスカウトアメリカれんめいたいデールじけん、Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale)530 U.S. 640 (2000)は、2000年6月28日にアメリカ連邦最高裁判所が、公共施設で同性愛者を平等に扱うことを定めた州法があることにかかわらず、憲法が保障する結社の自由により、ボーイスカウトアメリカ連盟 (BSA)が同性愛者を会員から除外することを認める判決を出した事件。BSAといった民間団体は、「その人物の存在がその団体の公的または私的な見解を主張する力に重大な影響を与える」場合は、その人物を会員から除外することができると判断された。5対4の票差で、連邦最高裁判所は同性愛への反対はBSAの「表現活動」の一部であり、成人の同性愛者をリーダーに置くことは、その表現活動を妨害することになると判決した。 (ja)
  • 美國童軍訴戴爾案(英語:Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale), U.S. 640 (2000),是美國最高法院在2000年6月28日的里程碑案件,法院裁定美國童軍(BSA)這種私人團體有憲法提供的結社自由權,當「該人的存在以一種顯著的方式,影響該團體倡導公共或私人觀點的能力」時,得以排除其會籍。以五對四的票數,最高法院判決同性戀不得入會的立場是美國童軍「表達的訊息」,而同性戀作為成人領袖將干擾該訊息。該案推翻了的判決,其判定紐澤西州的公共場合法(英語:public accommodations law)規定美國童軍須重新接納被組織驅逐出去的公開同性戀童軍團長。 (zh)
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court, decided on June 28, 2000, that held that the constitutional right to freedom of association allowed the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) to exclude a homosexual person from membership in spite of a state law requiring equal treatment of homosexuals in public accommodations. More generally, the court ruled that a private organization such as the BSA may exclude a person from membership when "the presence of that person affects in a significant way the group's ability to advocate public or private viewpoints". In a five to four decision, the Supreme Court ruled that opposition to homosexuality is part of BSA's "expressive message" and that allowing homosexuals as adult leaders would interfe (en)
rdfs:label
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (en)
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (de)
  • Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale (fr)
  • ボーイスカウトアメリカ連盟対デール事件 (ja)
  • 美國童軍訴戴爾案 (zh)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Boy Scouts of America and Monmouth Council, et al., Petitioners v. James Dale (en)
is dbo:knownFor of
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is rdfs:seeAlso of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy