An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the First Amendment and the ability of the government to outlaw certain forms of expressive conduct. It ruled that the state has the constitutional authority to ban public nudity, even as part of expressive conduct such as dancing, because it furthers a substantial government interest in protecting the morality and order of society. This case is perhaps best summarized by a sentence in Justice Souter's concurring opinion, which is often paraphrased as "Nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct."

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the First Amendment and the ability of the government to outlaw certain forms of expressive conduct. It ruled that the state has the constitutional authority to ban public nudity, even as part of expressive conduct such as dancing, because it furthers a substantial government interest in protecting the morality and order of society. This case is perhaps best summarized by a sentence in Justice Souter's concurring opinion, which is often paraphrased as "Nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct." (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10653273 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 15629 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1031876216 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Souter (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • White (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Michael Barnes, prosecuting attorney of St. Joseph County Indiana, et al. v. Glen Theatre, Inc., et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • States have the authority and right to regulate and/or ban nudity, as it is in the interests of both the government and society to preserve morality by statute. Nudity is not protected under the First Amendment, nor expressive content. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens (en)
dbp:joinplurality
  • O'Connor, Kennedy (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:plurality
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 560 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 501 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the First Amendment and the ability of the government to outlaw certain forms of expressive conduct. It ruled that the state has the constitutional authority to ban public nudity, even as part of expressive conduct such as dancing, because it furthers a substantial government interest in protecting the morality and order of society. This case is perhaps best summarized by a sentence in Justice Souter's concurring opinion, which is often paraphrased as "Nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct." (en)
rdfs:label
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Michael Barnes, prosecuting attorney of St. Joseph County Indiana, et al. v. Glen Theatre, Inc., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy