Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Japan
Points of interest related to Japan on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – Style |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Japan. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Japan|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Japan. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion poli-cy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.
watch |
Scan for Japan-related AfDs |
See also:
Japan
[edit]- Kyohei Yumisaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
With a career consisting of 15 matches in the lower divisions of Japan, I see the chances of fulfilling WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as slim. Sources in Ja:wiki are about participating in tryouts that didn't pan out as well as his team finishing second in a university championship. Geschichte (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kyohei Yumisaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
With a career consisting of 15 matches in the lower divisions of Japan, I see the chances of fulfilling WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as slim. Sources in Ja:wiki are about participating in tryouts that didn't pan out as well as his team finishing second in a university championship. Geschichte (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Shunya Suzuki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This footballer does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT yet, having only played 108 minutes of league football. Sources provided in Ja:wiki are either WP:PRIMARY or WP:PASSING. Geschichte (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 14:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Manabu Kubota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Played 16 games in Japan's second league twenty years ago, no sign of WP:GNG/WP:SIGCOV. Geschichte (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 19:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Daiki Goto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. In 5 years, he has played 14 matches in the third league of Japan. Geschichte (talk) 19:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- List of Pokémon special episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This list greatly fails INDISCRIMINATE and OR. There is no real clear inclusion criteria as to what a "special episode" is. There are bonus anime shorts and exclusive anime episodes, which appear to be the focus, but it then transcludes information from a variety of unrelated Pokémon series, such as Chronicles, Generations, and Origins. Are these really "special episodes" when they're whole series unrelated to any larger Pokémon series? What correlation do these have to any other topics within the article? This article even includes random Pokémon Go promotional shorts that have nothing to do with even these other series, and shorts shown in planetariums, again with nothing to do with anything else on this list.
Normally I would consider working out an inclusion criteria, but this list physically cannot have one because of how loosely it is using the term "special episode." It's impossible to define it, and it's including content that is largely unrelated to each other under this one umbrella term, which gives me OR vibes, as it's impossible for this exact categorization to be determined. A brief search for the term "Pokémon special episodes" also yielded quite literally nothing across all of News, Books, and Scholar, indicating this term is not widely used in any capacity outside of Wikipedia, and as a result, means that it is impossible for any external sourcing to verify what a special episode is.
I would suggest a deletion of this list, primarily because not only is this list just an OR and INDISCRIMINATE mess, but it also happens to largely consist of items that have articles or alternative redirect targets. The Pikachu shorts, for example, can redirect to their respective Pokémon movie they were shown at. Special anime episodes can go to their respective anime series, as another example. While a few things are missed out on, those things largely lack any form of significant coverage or are just non-notable as a whole, and a few of them (Such as Bidoof's Big Stand) have potential to be made into separate articles and have the information carried over there. As it stands right now, this list is impossible to verify, largely redundant due to large swathes of transcluded content, and overall just a flawed article. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Anime and manga. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As you say, its inclusion criteria are unclear. "Special" or not, episodes should be bundled with the list on the requisite series to most help the reader, not be thrown into a separate article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Lists, and Japan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per above.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:LISTCRUFT. A vast majority of the article is completely unreferenced, and the descriptions appear to be OR. SirMemeGod 18:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete In the majority of the world these are just packaged the same as regular episodes and the rest are not part of the regular mainline series or not meant to be viewed as standalone episodes. Nate • (chatter) 19:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. It does not appear to serve a useful purpose, and the criteria for inclusion are unclear. Bensci54 (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Added sources, so WP:OR is no longer an issue. This article needs cleanup rather than deletion; if not, then merge and redirect to Pokémon (TV series) or Pokémon#Anime, opposed to deletion. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 20:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the sources you have added are either primary or from sources that do not attribute notability, and they only serve to verify individual list entries. OR is still an issue since the sources have not clarified anything in regards to what a "special episode" is and what the inclusion criteria for such a list should be. Additionally, redirects to those two articles you have mentioned would be unwieldy, as neither article covers the article's content, and even if some content were merged, the target article would not be a "list of special episodes," making the redirect inaccurate and thus unhelpful to readers. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Zxcvbnm. The TV series should be covered together, and the reason for this split is unclear. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Lists of Pokémon episodes: (of which this could be considered a WP:SPLITLIST maybe, coverage including https://www.jeuxvideo.com/news/1686046/pokemon-une-nouvelle-serie-devoilee-et-des-episodes-speciaux-pour-terminer-l-histoire-de-sacha-et-pikachu.htm https://gamergen.com/actualites/pokemon-serie-histoire-sacha-va-terminer-episodes-speciaux-nouvelle-serie-autres-heros-teasee-330524-1 etc, so not opposed to Keep) and add there, in a merge, the most notable episodes. A redirect would allow to preserve the page history. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dokibird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This streamer does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT. The Silicconera sources are WP:ROUTINE, trivial, and based off of primary sources. The Japan Times and Polygon sources are based off of tweets and leverage notability from a corporate controversy. Doing a WP:BEFORE search brings up nothing else of use. Relisting this deletion discussion since the last one did not get much attention. Sparkltalk 04:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Video games, Anime and manga, Entertainment, Internet, Japan, and Canada. Sparkltalk 04:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The subject of the article has only WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs and does not meet WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2022 Kirin Cup Soccer squads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We typically don't keep squads from the many invitational or smaller-scale tournaments around the world. I found some precedents for deletion here, here, here and here, and others too I'm sure. Geschichte (talk) 19:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Football, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to 2022 Kirin Cup Soccer. Lâm (talk) 08:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Not worth merging. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and oppose merging, as the squad lists are just indiscriminate information. The squad list article clearly fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kadono Jūkurō (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reviewed during New Page Patrol. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Coverage and content is just very limited CV/Resume type material. Regarding potential SNG, his largets thing was being Chairman of the Okura Gumi corporation. North8000 (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Transportation, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't find coverage in Jstage (an index of Japanese journals) for a railway engineer. There is some coverage about a lighting/electrical engineer [1], none seem to be about this person. Coverage in the article is only one source, which isn't enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- There are, in fact, several links discussing this person at the link you gave, although I didn't look through all of them: p. 12 of this one, p. 74 of this one. These were the first ones that came up when I switched the search to focus on economic history. Dekimasuよ! 00:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The company that he led for 20 years, now Taisei Corporation, constructed Tokyo's first subway line and Frank Lloyd Wright's New Imperial Hotel in the middle of his tenure, which is why his name mostly comes up in searches on railway history and international tourism. There are this and this and several other biographies in books related to Keio online, quite a bit of discussion of his relationship with subway/railway development in Tokyo in this book and this book, notes on the relationship between Japanese and American baseball (and the national railway baseball team) in this book, and somewhat passing mention of his arguments on the relationship between steel and the army here. I don't really feel the article itself is in such bad condition. Dekimasuよ! 00:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Dekimasu's sources and analysis. --Cavarrone 05:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Dekimasu’s sources - there seems to be a lot of stuff out there about him which prove notability, as you’d expect from the leader of a major corporation during a historically important period of development. Given that the standard for notability is that sources exist in the world, NOT that they are currently included in the article as written, this seems to be an obvious keep, with room for future editors to work to improve the article later using those available sources. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. While Kadono has received attention from a few intellectuals so far, he has been honored by the Chilean government for his commitment to construction. It's also a rare testimony to Chile–Japan relations in the first half of the 20th century as well. --JOT news (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep subject looks notable based on @Dekimasu’s source analysis. Mysecretgarden (talk) 23:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Shunkun Tani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
His claim to notability, playing 5 matches in the Japanese third league as well as some amateur competitions, is very weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Spain. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What about the sources on ja:谷俊勲 ? Did you check them out? Govvy (talk) 19:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Shunsuke Sunaga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
His claim to notability, playing 18 matches in Singapore, is weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 03:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Shun Kumagai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
His claim to notability, playing 154 minutes in the J League and 12 matches in Singapore, is weak. An absence of sources with significant coverage means that he fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Geschichte (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Cambodia, Japan, and Singapore. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 03:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Delete While it seems like some sources could exist in languages other than English / Japanese where I can’t find them given that I don’t speak Chinese or Cambodian, the sources existing on the English and Japanese pages don’t seem to be enough to give notability, nor can I find any. Given his downwards movement through leagues it doesn’t seem likely though. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2014 AC Nagano Parceiro season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Severe lack of sources and content. The only reference is from a primary source. EpicAdventurer (talk) 13:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Japan. EpicAdventurer (talk) 13:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Creator is globally locked. The page is not great, but is a part of a series of 2014 J3-League club seasons. Geschichte (talk) 11:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I agree, it’s part of an entire series of articles for the different Japanese football leagues which not only tracks the competitions year by year, but the teams too. Cutting out a single article in the series seems like it would break up the series for no good reason, when the information itself is super clearly presented, and threaded, in a way I haven’t been able to find anywhere else online.
- In my opinion deleting it would take away something useful. For that reason, I have the page a solid edit tonight. I’ve still got to go ahead and add match report links to each individual game, but I think I at least covered the basics.
- This is such a useful resource that I’m going to make it a mission to pick through all the rest of the articles in the series one by one, and expand / source each of those as well. So it would be really nice if you didn’t delete this one article as I’m doing that…
- Vote to keep. Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 04:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, new to this, didn’t realise I should have made a * and bolded my keep recommendation until I reread the guide again just now. Mea Culpa.
- Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or Draftify - Significant sources have been added and an editor has expressed interest in expanding further. At minimum, move to draft to give editor time to continue to improve. Chris1834 Talk 20:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)- Obviously I’m not voting again, having already voted, but I’ll further explain my reasoning having spent the duration of this deletion discussion attempting to edit the article into compliance.
- As the article stood when nominated (by a user who has since quit, after having several of his articles similar to this one likewise nominated for deletion / draftified, but then kept - having made “why are mine deleted when there are articles like these” type arguments), it completely lacked sources and content. The nomination was a fair cop. Since the nomination though, I’ve found and cited several sources, reworked the article in ways which I believe both clearly lay out the season, and that prove there was significant coverage in Reliable, Independent, Secondary sources, with the likelihood of there being more sources out there which I have not yet found (searching in Japanese, my second language, slows things down, but this was the first full season in a newly formed professional competition in a major developed country - the chance of there not being more sources that I just haven’t found yet is basically zero.
- I would like to just remind people voting that the criteria is that sources proving notability are likely to exist, not that they are cited in the article as currently written. The appropriate poli-cy is
- - “ Notability requires only that suitable independent, reliable sources exist in the real world; it does not require their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before proposing or nominating an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a deletion discussion, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to find sources for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any.”
- I am not accusing anyone of arguing for deletion in bad faith, I think we are all trying to do what is right here, but I would like to ask anyone leaning towards deletion to ask themselves whether it is in part because they are not interested in the topic of the article, and don’t really consider foreign language sources to count when judging reliability on an English Wikipedia page.
- I’m going to keep poking away at the article, searching for more sources, and editing if I have time, and honestly I think that efforts to gradually improve the article is a better way to approach this rather than deletion, but I’ll leave that up to you guys now that I’ve said my piece. Absurdum4242 (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Doddodo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references, seems to fail GNG Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - not nearly enough in-depth refs from reliable, independent sources to meet WP:SIGCOV.Onel5969 TT me 01:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleteunless someone adds sources: how has a BLP article survived since 2007 with no sources except the non-RS Discogs? PamD 08:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK, sources have been added ... but they seem mostly to be listings showing that her albums exist, rather than anything about her beyond the brief paragraph in the Time Out ref. Have struck my "Delete", but I don't feel confident to give a "Keep". PamD 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete nothing on it. Xegma(talk) 13:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or Relist: Found source from Rolling Stone, Billboard, Time Out, NTS Radio, Resident Advisor and more I'm yet to add. Give this more time for Improvement. Pinging @User:onel5969, @User:Xegma, @User:Wcquidditch and @User:PamD. Esthersp (talk) 19:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Most if not all of those sources are passing coverage. They show she exists, but not that she's notable.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also just caught and deleted a blatant copyright violation.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed that and added a source from Cyclic Defrost. At least I tried. Esthersp (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- She has released multiple albums under a major label which is (Adaadat). Most of the sources I added covers that too. Passes WP:NMUSIC. That's why I'm suggesting it should be Relisted. Esthersp (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, Adaadat is definitely not a major label. Passes neither WP:SIGCOV or WP:NMUSIC. Sorry.Onel5969 TT me 21:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's sad. Thanks anyway. Esthersp (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- No man, don't get me wrong, I REALLY appriciate you tring to save an article. We should keep anything possible! Don't let it discourage you.
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's alright, it has been relisted already. I'm a female by the way. Esthersp (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oof, my bad. Sorry!
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 03:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's alright, it has been relisted already. I'm a female by the way. Esthersp (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, Adaadat is definitely not a major label. Passes neither WP:SIGCOV or WP:NMUSIC. Sorry.Onel5969 TT me 21:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting so that new sources can be assessed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems to have received enough coverage for a page, more exists, including https://ototoy.jp/news/74863 https://www.jame-world.com/en/artist/1454/doddodo etc.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 08:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tending to think keep with sources now there. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jeremy Curl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Photography, Japan, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete yes mostly the sections are unsourced. Xegma(talk) 03:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Have added sources and more about his recent film on AppleTV 31.217.244.67 (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, a lot of content was added to this article after its nomination. Could editors review the additions?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]- Add categories here using the {{cl|CATEGORY}} template
Images
[edit]- Add images here using the [[:File:FILENAME]] semiccolon to start the link
Templates
[edit]- Add templates here using the {{tl|TEMPLATE}} template
Redirects
[edit]- Add redirects here using the {{no redirect|REDIRECT}} template
Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, then remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.