unit-2
unit-2
UNIT II
PLANNING
Planning is the most basic of all the management functions. There is no choice
between planning and no planning. The choice is only with the regard to the method
and techniques used to plan.
DEFINITION
According to Koontz O’Donnell - "Planning is deciding in advance what to do,
how to do it, when to do it and who is to do it. It is the selection among the
alternatives of future course of action for the enterprise as a whole and each
department within it.
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF PLANNING
Nature of Planning
1. Planning is goal-oriented: Every plan must contribute in some positive way
towards the accomplishment of group objectives. Planning has no meaning without
being related to goals.
2. Planning is primary function of management:
The functions of management are broadly classified as planning, organization,
direction and control. It is thus the first function of management at all levels. Since
planning is involved at all managerial functions, it is rightly called as an essence of
management.
3. Planning focuses on objectives:
Planning is a process to determine the objectives or goals of an enterprise. It lays
down the means to achieve these objectives. The purpose of every plan is to
contribute in the achievement of objectives of an enterprise.
Purpose of Planning
1. To manage by objectives: All the activities of an organization are designed to
achieve certain specified objectives. However, planning makes the objectives more
concrete by focusing attention on them.
2. To offset uncertainty and change: Future is always full of uncertainties and
changes. Planning foresees the future and makes the necessary provisions for it.
3. To secure economy in operation: Planning involves, the selection of most
profitable course of action that would lead to the best result at the minimum costs. 4.
To help in co-ordination: Co-ordination is, indeed, the essence of management,
the planning is the base of it. Without planning it is not possible to co-ordinate the
different activities of an organization.
5. To make control effective: The controlling function of management relates to the
comparison of the planned performance with the actual performance. In the absence
of plans, a management will have no standards for controlling other's performance.
4. To increase organizational effectiveness: Mere efficiency in the organization is
not important; it should also lead to productivity and effectiveness. Planning enables
the manager to measure the organizational effectiveness in the context of the stated
objectives and take further actions in this direction.
Establishing objectives
The first and primary step in planning process is the establishment of planning
objectives or goals. Definite objectives, in fact, speak categorically about what is to
be done, where to place the initial emphasis and the things to be accomplished by
the network of policies, procedures, budgets and programmes, the lack of which
would invariably result in either faulty or ineffective planning. It needs mentioning in
this connection that objectives must be understandable and rational to make
planning effective. Because the major objective, in all enterprise, needs be translated
into derivative objective, accomplishment of enterprise objective needs a concrete
endeavor of all the departments.
Establishment of Planning Premises
Planning premises are assumptions about the future understanding of the expected
situations. These are the conditions under which planning activities are to be
undertaken. These premises may be internal or external. Internal premises are
internal variables that affect the planning. These include organizational polices,
various resources and the ability of the organization to withstand the environmental
pressure. External premises include all factors in task environment like political,
social technological, competitors’ plans and actions, government policies, market
conditions. Both internal factors should be considered in formulating plans. At the top
level mainly external premises are considered. As one moves downward, internal
premises gain importance.
Evaluation of Alternatives
Having sought out the available alternatives along with their strong and weak points,
planners are required to evaluate the alternatives giving due weight-age to various
factors involved, for one alternative may appear to be most profitable involving heavy
cash outlay whereas the other less profitable but involve least risk. Likewise, another
course of action may be found contributing significantly to the company’s long-range
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
objectives although immediate expectations are likely to go unfulfilled. Evidently,
evaluation of alternative is a must to arrive at a decision. Otherwise, it would be
difficult to choose the best course of action in the perspective of company needs and
resources as well as objectives laid down.
Selecting a Course of Action
The fifth step in planning is selecting a course of action from among alternatives. In
fact, it is the point of decision-making-deciding upon the plan to be adopted for
accomplishing the enterprise objectives.
Types of Planning
Operational Planning
“Operational plans are about how things need to happen,” motivational leadership
speaker Mack Story said at LinkedIn. “Guidelines of how to accomplish the mission
OPERATIONAL PLANNING
Rules
Objectives Budgets
Strategies Methods
Projects
Policies
Procedures
Standing plans are usually made once and retain their value over a period of years
while undergoing periodic revisions and updates. The following are examples of
ongoing plans.
i) Mission:
. The mission is a statement that reflects the basic purpose and focus of the
organization which normally remain unchanged. The mission of the company is the
answer of the question: why does the organization exists? Properly crafted mission
statements serve as filters to separate what is important from what is not, clearly
state which markets will be served and how, and communicate a sense of intended
direction to the entire organization. Mission of Ford: “we are a global, diverse family
with a proud inheritance, providing exceptional products and services”.
ii) Objectives or goals
Both goal and objective can be defined as statements that reflect the end towards
which the organization is aiming to achieve. However, there are significant
differences between the two. A goal is an abstract and general umbrella statement,
under which specific objectives can be clustered. Objectives are statements that
describe—in precise, measurable, and obtainable terms which reflect the desired
organization’s outcomes.
iii) Strategies: Strategy is the determination of the basic long term objectives of an
organization and the adoption of action and collection of action and allocation of
resources necessary to achieve these goals. Strategic planning begins with an
organization's mission. Strategic plans look ahead over the next two, three, five, or
even more years to move the organization from where it currently is to where it
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
wants to be. Requiring multilevel involvement, these plans demand harmony among
all levels of management within the organization. Top-level management develops
the directional objectives for the entire organization, while lower levels of
management develop compatible objectives and plans to achieve them. Top
management's strategic plan for the entire organization becomes the framework and
sets dimensions for the lower level planning.
Policy: A policy provides a broad guideline for managers to follow when dealing with
important areas of decision making. Policies are general statements that explain how
a manager should attempt to handle routine management responsibilities. Typical
human resources policies, for example, address such matters as employee hiring,
terminations, performance appraisals, pay increases, and discipline.
Procedure: A procedure is a set of step-by-step directions that explains how
activities or tasks are to be carried out.
Most organizations have procedures for purchasing supplies and equipment,
for example. This procedure usually begins with a supervisor completing a
purchasing requisition.
The requisition is then sent to the next level of management for approval. The
approved requisition is forwarded to the purchasing department.
Depending on the amount of the request, the purchasing department may
place an order, or they may need to secure quotations and/or bids for several
vendors before placing the order. By defining the steps to be taken and the
order in which they are to be done, procedures provide a standardized way of
responding to a repetitive problem.
Rule:
A rule is an explicit statement that tells an employee what he or she can and cannot
do. Rules are “do” and “don't” statements put into place to promote the safety of
employees and the uniform treatment and behavior of employees. For example,
rules about tardiness and absenteeism permit supervisors to make discipline
decisions rapidly and with a high degree of fairness.
i) Single-use plans apply to activities that do not recur or repeat. A one-time
occurrence, such as a special sales program, is a single-use plan because it deals
with the who, what, where, how, and how much of an activity.
Programme: Programme consists of an ordered list of events to be followed
to execute a project.
Budget: A budget predicts sources and amounts of income and how much
they are used for a specific project.
Program
Methods
Methods prescribe the ways in which in which specific tasks of a procedure must be
performed. Also, methods are very specific and detailed instructions on how the
employees must perform every task of the planned procedure. So managers form
methods to formalize routine jobs.
Methods are very important types of plan for an organization. They help in the
following ways
Budget
A budget is a statement of expected results the managers expect from the company.
Budgets are also a quantitative statement, so they are expressed in numerical terms.
A budget quantifies the forecast or future of the organization.
There are many types of budgets that managers make. There is the obvious financial
budget that forecasts the profit of the company. Then there are operational budgets
generally prepared by lower-level managers. Cash budgets monitor the cash inflows
and outflows of the company.
Projects
Strategic planning
“Strategic plans are all about why things need to happen,” Story said. “It’s big
picture, long-term thinking. It starts at the highest level with defining a mission and
casting a vision.”
Strategic planning includes a high-level overview of the entire business. It’s the
foundational basis of the organization and will dictate long-term decisions. The scope
of strategic planning can be anywhere from the next two years to the next 10 years.
Important components of a strategic plan are vision, mission and values.
Steps in MBO:
The entire development of an organization depends on the set goals. A goal is the
most critical and necessary factor behind the effectiveness and efficiency of an
organization, so it is important to effectively manage set goals either single or many
of different kinds. Prior to start working on the set goals, the managers should
determine organizational goals with the aim to create a potential management that
must be capable of handling different kinds of goals easily. Determining goals don’t
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
mean creating goals, as the preliminary goals are set by the top level supervisors on
the basis of in-depth analysis and judgment about what should be accomplished and
how to do so in a certain period.
After determining the organizational goals, the next thing to do is to know the
individual’s goals or more clearly employees’ goals. It is the responsibility of the
manager to ask employees about what goals they can accomplish within a specific
time period and what resources will they use to achieve the goal. Also, if needed,
then managers and employees can classify the goals from the most important to the
least one in order to make the goal achieving process more easily and in favor of the
organization.
The process of MBO is not just set for providing additional effectiveness to managers
across the organization, but it is also equally important for constantly monitoring the
progress and performance of the employees. There are certain things stated below
that can help managers to monitor performance and progress.
4. Performance Evaluation
As per the basic concept of MBO, the performance evaluation comes under the
responsibility of concerned managers and is made by their participation. Keep in the
mind, performance evaluation is one the most important factors of the organization
that can help operating certain objectives smoothly.
5. Providing Feedback
Advantages
Motivation – Involving employees in the whole process of goal setting and
increasing employee empowerment. This increases employee job satisfaction
and commitment.
Better communication and Coordination – Frequent reviews and interactions
between superiors and subordinates help to maintain harmonious
relationships within the organization and also to solve many problems.
Clarity of goals
Subordinates have a higher commitment to objectives they set themselves
than those imposed on them by another person.
Managers can ensure that objectives of the subordinates are linked to the
organization's objectives.
Limitations
There are several limitations to the assumptive base underlying the impact of
managing by objectives, including:
It over-emphasizes the setting of goals over the working of a plan as a driver
of outcomes.
It underemphasizes the importance of the environment or context in which the
goals are set. That context includes everything from the availability and
quality of resources, to relative buy-in by leadership and stake-holders.
Companies evaluated their employees by comparing them with the "ideal"
employee. Trait appraisal only looks at what employees should be, not at
what they should do. When this approach is not properly set, agreed and
managed by organizations, self-centered employees might be prone to distort
results, falsely representing achievement of targets that were set in a short-
term, narrow fashion. In this case, managing by objectives would be
counterproductive.
POLICIES
Policies are general statements or understandings that guide managers’ thinking in
decision making. They usually do not require action but are intended to guide
managers in their commitment to the decision they ultimately make. The first step in
the process of policy formulation, as shown in the diagram below, is to capture the
values or principles that will guide the rest of the process and form the basis on
which to produce a statement of issues. The statement of issues involves identifying
the opportunities and constraints affecting the local housing market, and is to be
produced by thoroughly analyzing the housing market. The kit provides the user with
Policy formulation process: creating policies for the organization is an integral part
of the process of planning. In order to ensure that the operations of the organization
run smoothly, proper policies have to be formulated by the managers. However, a
comprehensive process is involved in creating the most suitable policies for an
organization. Therefore, the below mentioned process needs to be followed by the
managers while creating policies for their organization:-
1. Identifying the policy area: first of all the managers are required to identify the
particular field for which they are going to formulate the policy. At the same time, the
managers are also required to consider the objectives as well as the demands of the
organization. For example, when the managers are formulating policy related with
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
marketing, they should keep in mind the expectations and the thrust areas of
marketing for the organization. In the same way, the scope of the policy formulated
by them depends on the area that such policy is going to cover. Therefore, it is a
very important that first of all the managers identify the particular area that is going to
be covered by the policy that they’re going to create.
3. Assessing the alternatives: the various alternatives that are available to the
managers need to be evaluated, keeping in mind the goals of the organization. The
managers should evaluate how these alternatives can contribute towards the
achievement of its goals by the organization. Therefore the factors like resource
requirements, costs and benefits provided by each alternative have to be carefully
examined by the managers. In the same way, while creating a policy, the managers
should also evaluate the impact of different alternatives on the environment of the
organization.
4. Selecting the most appropriate policy: after the managers have carefully
examined all the available alternatives, they should select the alternative that is most
appropriate for their organization. In this regard, it needs to be noted that selecting a
policy for the organization involves a long-term commitment. Therefore if the
managers feel that a particular alternative may not be satisfactory, then they should
work to find out other alternatives.
6. Implementation of the policy: If it has been found during the trial period that the
policy will prove to be successful in achieving its objectives, the policy should be
implemented in the organization. However, it is very important that such a policy
should be explained in detail to all the persons who are responsible for implementing
the policy. For this purpose, a detailed discussion can also be held regarding the
probable implications as well as the impact of different provisions of the policy.
Therefore if the policy has been properly communicated to the employees, the
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
employees will be aware of the purpose and objective behind the policy and it will
also help in the proper implementation of the policy.
PLANNING PREMISES
The process of planning is based upon estimates of future. Though past guides the
plans in present, plans are made to achieve the goals in future. Therefore, forecast
of future events leads to efficient plans. Since future events are not known
accurately, assumption is made about these events. These events may be known
conditions (changes in the tax laws as announced in the budget) or anticipated
events which may or may not happen (entry of competitor in the same market with
the same product).Though these assumptions are primarily based on scientific
analysis and models, managers also use their intuition and judgement to make
assumptions about future events. Identifying the factors (assumptions) that affect
plans is called premising and the methods used for making premises are called
forecasting. The forecast or the assumptions about future which provide a base for
planning in present are known as planning premises. They are “the anticipated
environment in which plans are expected to operate. They include assumptions or
forecasts of the future and known conditions that will affect the operation of plans.
The estimates about future markets, consumer preferences, political and economic
environment are the planning premises on which business plans are developed but if
plans are made and their efficiency is judged in terms of future market demands,
revenues and costs, they are mere expectations of plans. Such plans provide
planning premise for other plans.
Process of Planning Premises:
Wrong premises can lead to failure of plans.
Since environmental factors affect business plans (also non-business plans)
to a great extent, premises must be developed rationally and scientifically
through the following process:
1. Selection of the premises:
Though there are innumerable factors in the environment, all of them do not affect
operations of the business enterprise. Top managers should select the premises
which have direct impact on developing organizational plans. There are many factors
that affect business decisions, some of which are general in nature while others are
selective. The general factors affect all the firms alike but specific factors affect
different firms differently. While developing premises, organizations should focus
more on specific factors (or its micro environment) as they have immediate impact
on making the plans.
In order to analyse the factors that affect developing the premises, two factors
have to be taken into account:
I. The probability of impact of factors:
If represents whether the factors under study affect or do not affect the planning
premises.
Whenever the managers plan business operations and organisational set-up for the
years ahead, they have to take into account the past, the present and the prevailing
economic, political and social conditions. Forecasting provides a logical basis for
determining in advance the nature of future business operations and the basis for
managerial decisions about the material, personnel and other requirements.
2. Forecasting is needed for planning process because it devises the future course
of action.
4. Forecasting is made by analyzing the past and present factors which are relevant
for the functioning of an organization.
5. The analysis of various factors may require the use of statistical and mathematical
tools and techniques.
Techniques of Forecasting:
1. Qualitative Techniques:
This method is most commonly used. It is based on the belief that future trends will
develop in the same direction as past trends. It assumes that the future will remain
as in the recent past. Hence, past trends are plotted on a graph or chart to show the
curve.
(a) Taking the current years’ actual performance as base for future prediction;
(b) Increasing certain percentages with the last year’s actual performance to predict
the future events; and
This is another judgmental technique. It polls a panel of experts and gathers their
opinions on specific topics. The forecasting unit decides the experts whose opinions
it wants to know. Each expert does not know who the others are. The experts make
their forecasts and the coordinator summarizes their responses. Here, the experts
express their views independently without knowledge of the responses of other
experts.
Another type of qualitative forecast is the market survey. In this approach, the
forecaster can poll, in person or by questionnaire, customers or clients about
expected future behaviour. For example- people can be asked about their probable
future purchases of cars. This method is effective if the right people are sampled in
enough numbers. It asks a set of “experts”—consumers or potential consumers—
what they will do.
These techniques are based on the assumption that the “past is a good predictor of
the future.” These prove useful when lot of historical data are available and when
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
stable trends axe apparent. These techniques identify a pattern representing a
combination of trend, seasonal, and cyclical factors based on historical data. These
methods try to identify the “best-fit” line by eliminating the effect of random
fluctuations.
Quantitative Techniques:
Following are the important quantitative techniques used for the purpose of
forecasting:
This is also called Index Number Method. Just as Barometer is used to measure the
atmospheric pressure similarly in business Index numbers are used to measure the
state of economy between two or more periods. When used in conjunction with one
another or combined with one or more index numbers, provide an indication of the
direction in which the economy is heading.
For example—a rise in the amount of investment may bring an upswing in the
economy. It may reflect higher employment and income opportunity after some
period.
Thus, with the help of business activity index numbers, it becomes easy to forecast
the future course of action projecting the expected change in related activities within
a lag of some period. This lag period though difficult to predict precisely, gives some
advance signals for likely change in future.
The forecasts should bear in mind that such barometers (index numbers) have their
own limitations and precautions should be taken in their use. These barometers may
be used only when general trend may reject the business of the forecasts. It has
been advised that different index numbers should be prepared for different activities.
This is also known as ‘Time Series Analysis’. This analysis involves trend, seasonal
variations, cyclical variations and irregular or random variations. This technique is
used when data are available for a long period of time and the trend is clearly visible
and stable. It is based on the assumption that past trend will continue in future. This
is considered valid for short term projection. In this different formulas are used to fit
the trend.
Extrapolation method is based Time series, because it believes that the behaviour of
the series in the past will continue in future also and on this basis future is predicted.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
This method slightly differs from trend analysis method. Under it, effects of various
components of the time series are not separated, but are taken in their totality. It
assumes that the effect of these factors is of a constant and stable pattern and would
also continue to be so in future.
In this method two or more inter-related series are used to disclose the relationship
between the two variables. A number of variables affect a business phenomenon
simultaneously in economic and business situation. This analysis helps in isolating
the effects of various factors to a great extent.
For example- there is a positive relationship between sales expenditure and sales
profit. It is possible here to estimate sales on the basis of expenditure on sales
(independent variable) and also profits on the basis of projected sales, provided
other things remain the same.
This is also known as “End Use Technique.” The technique is based on the
hypothesis of various sectors of the economy industry which are inter-related. Such
inter-relationship is known as coefficient in mathematical terms. For example—
Cement requirements of a country may be well predicted on the basis of its rate of
usage by various sectors of economy, say industry, etc. and by adjusting this rate on
the basis of how the various sectors behave in future.
DECISION MAKING
The word decision has been derived from the Latin word "decidere" which means
"cutting off". Thus, decision involves cutting off of alternatives between those that are
desirable and those that are not desirable.
In the words of George R. Terry, "Decision-making is the selection based on some
criteria from two or more possible alternatives".
Characteristics of Decision Making
• Decision making implies that there are various alternatives and the most desirable
alternative is chosen to solve the problem or to arrive at expected results.
• The decision-maker has freedom to choose an alternative.
• Decision-making may not be completely rational but may be judgemental and
emotional.
• Decision-making is goal-oriented.
• Decision-making is a mental or intellectual process because the final decision is
made by the decision-maker.
• A decision may be expressed in words or may be implied from behaviour.
• Choosing from among the alternative courses of operation implies uncertainty
about the final result of each possible course of operation.
4. Policy and Operating Decisions: The policy decisions are used for deciding the
basic policies related with the organization. These decisions are taken by the top
management of the organization. The policies that have been decided by the top
management also act as the basis for the operating decisions. No decision can be
taken that goes beyond the policy framework. In this way, the policy decisions are
very important and their impact is also long-term.
On the other hand, the operating decisions are less significant. These are related
with the day-to-day operations of the organization. The operative decisions are taken
while keeping in view the policies that have been decided by the organization. The
operative decisions are taken by the middle and the lower level management
because in these decisions, real execution and supervision is also involved. For
example, the decision to grant bonus to the employees of the organization can be
described as a policy decision but once this decision has been made, the exact
amount that is going to be paid to each employee will be an operated decision.
1. Defining the Problem: the first step that is related with the process of decision-
making is to find the real problem. There are many cases when it is not easy to find
the real problem. Therefore, the managers should see what the real reason behind
the trouble is and what can be the possible solutions to the problem. On the other
hand, if the problem is not defined correctly, the decision made for such a problem
will also be wrong and as a result, the money and efforts spent to find the decision
will be wasted. At the same time, new problems may also be created by the wrong
decision instead of solving the real problem.
Before a manager tries to define the problem, it is necessary that the manager
should identify the strategic or the critical factor of the problem. It has been
mentioned that the theory of strategic factor is necessary when it comes to the
application of the process of decision-making. It has also been emphasized that in
the process of decision-making, the analysis that has to be made by the manager is
in reality a search for strategic factors. These factors can be the basic cause of
obstacles due to which it had become difficult to find the proper solution to a
problem. On the other hand, when the problem has been properly defined by the
managers, then it becomes easy for the managers to solve the problem. Therefore,
the determination of the problem is the first step in the process of decision-making.
2. Analyzing the Problem: After a problem has been identified by the managers,
the next step in the process of decision-making is to analyze the problem. For this
purpose, the managers should gather all information related with the problem and
then they are required to decide if the information available to them is sufficient for
taking a decision. It has been generally seen that the managers do not have the
sufficient information for making a particular decision. For example in some cases, it
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
may be too costly to get the required information. It has been said that for the
purpose of making a sound decision, it is not necessary that the managers should
have all the facts but it is very important that the managers should be aware of the
fact that sufficient information is not available to them so that they can be aware of
the level of risk that is involved in a particular decision and also the level of rigidity
and precision that can be adopted in the proposed course of action. In this way,
whatever information is available to the managers, it should be used for the purpose
of analyzing the problem. On the other hand, if sufficient information is not available
to the managers, then the level of risk related with the decision should be analyzed.
4. Evaluating the Alternatives: After all the available alternatives have been
identified by the managers, the next step in the process of decision-making is to
evaluate all the alternatives available and then to select the most appropriate one.
For this purpose, the managers have to consider the advantages and disadvantages
of various alternatives. For this purpose the pros and cons of each alternative has to
be evaluated. With the help of this process, the managers can foresee the risk that
may be involved in case of each alternative. The managers should evaluate each
alternative in terms of the time and money that has to be spent on them. This helps
the managers in selecting the alternative that is most economical. A decision is easy
to make when it becomes clear that the consequences of a particular alternative is
favorable as compared to the other alternatives. On the other hand, when several
alternatives are available that have similar advantages, it is difficult for the managers
to make their choice. Therefore in such cases, the managers can also combine two
or more alternatives. In the same way, there can be a situation where none of the
alternatives present before the managers can provide favorable consequences.
Therefore, in such a case, the manager may have to make a significant decision of
not accepting any of the alternatives available. At the same time, the manager may
also try to develop new alternatives.
7: Taking the Decision and Following It: When the managers have evaluated the
various alternatives available to them, they can take a final decision. This decision
has to be communicated to all the persons who have the responsibility to take action
regarding the decision. For this purpose, the follow-up action taken by the managers
regarding a decision can show if the decision taken by them was based on any
wrong premises or facts. If this is the case, the managers can review the decision
and can also make the required changes. In this way, it is also very important that
the managers follow up the decision taken by them.The process of decision-making
involves selecting the most appropriate alternative out of the various alternatives that
are available to the managers. At the same time, the decision taken by the managers
at present will also have an effect on future. For this purpose, the decision-making
process involves the visualization of the conditions that may be present in future.
Therefore, it can be said that there is at least a certain amount of uncertainty present
in the decision-making process. Certain risks are related with the process of
decision-making and the conditions may also vary from certainty to complete
uncertainty. Due to this reason, the strategy of making decisions under different
conditions may also vary. Therefore the different conditions under which the
decisions have to be taken can be described as follows:-
1. Certainty:
When the certainty conditions are present, it can be reasonably expected by the
managers what is going to happen when a particular decision has been taken by
them. In this case, the required information is available and such information is also
a reliable. In the same way, the cause and effect relationship is also known. The
result is that the decisions taken by the managers under these situations at different
times provide the same results. In these situations, the managers use a deterministic
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
model, and it is assumed that all the factors are exact and there is no role for
chance.
2. Risk: In a risk situation, although the factual information may be present but it can
be insufficient. Mostly the managers have to take business decisions under risk
situations. The reason is that the information available with the managers does not
provide answers to the overall questions regarding the outcome of the decision. The
manager is required to develop estimates regarding the likelihood of different events
taking place. These estimates can be based on past experiences or on the other
information or intelligence. Decision-making under these conditions can be improved
if the managers can estimate the objective chances of an outcome by using certain
methods like the mathematical models. On the other hand, the managers may also
use subjective probability that is based on their experience and judgment. For this
purpose, several tools are available to the managers that can help in taking
decisions under risk conditions.
It is widely believed that the element of rationality should also be present in decision
making. In this regard, it is said that the decisions taken by the managers can be
effective if they are also rational. However, the meaning of the term rationality,
particularly in the context of decision-making, is not clear. The purpose of decision-
making is to achieve an objective. Rationality requires that the person making the
decision should be aware of the alternative courses of action that can be used to
achieve the objectives. Similarly, the person should have complete information and
also the ability to properly analyze the alternative courses of action available for
achieving the objective. At the same time, it is also required that there should be the
desire to find the appropriate solution and for this purpose the selected alternative
should be capable of achieving the objective. In this regard, rationality can be
described in terms of objective and intelligent action. In case of rationality, there is
also a behavioral nexus present between the ends and means. This means that if
the appropriate means have been selected for achieving the desired ends, the
decision can be described as a rational. However it is not possible that there can be
complete rationality in the process of decision-making, particularly in case of
management decisions. The decisions are made for future and therefore there is
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL/IV/VIII/Mrs.R.ANLY SOWMIA PAGE
SKR ENGINEERING COLLEGE MG6851-PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
always a certain amount of uncertainty involved in it. In the same way, it is also very
difficult to identify the entire alternative that may be available to achieve the
objectives. This can be particularly true in cases where an opportunity may be
involved to do the things that have not been done earlier. Even the latest software
may not be able to properly evaluate all the available alternatives.
Rationality also has other limitations. These limitations are related with time,
information and also related with certainty. Therefore, although the managers want
to be rational while making a decision, they have to satisfy with limited rationality
only. The reality is that the managers cannot be totally rational while making a
decision. For example, sometimes the aversion to risk that is present among the
managers may interfere with the desire of the managers to select the possible
solution. In this way, the element of risk may also act as a limitation. A large number
of managers want to play it safe and therefore, they take risk only by remaining
within the limits of rationality and also, keeping in view the size and nature of the risk.