Naghizadeh 2015
Naghizadeh 2015
com/phb
ISSN 1388-0209 print/ISSN 1744-5116 online
Editor-in-Chief: John M. Pezzuto
Pharm Biol, Early Online: 1–5
! 2015 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1025288
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract Keywords
Context: Ellagic acid (EA) produced antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects through the Analgesia, isobolographic analysis, visceral
central and peripheral sites of action. pain
Objective: The objective of the current study was to examine the functional interaction between
ellagic acid and carbamazepine (CBZ) on pain. History
Materials and methods: Fourteen groups of mice (8–10 each) were used in this study. Pain was
induced by intraperitoneal acetic acid in mice (writhing test) and the functional interaction Received 21 August 2014
was analyzed using the isobolographic method. EA at doses 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg and Revised 19 February 2015
carbamazepine at doses 3, 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg, alone and also in combination (1/2, 1/4, and Accepted 26 February 2015
1/8 of the drug’s ED50) were intraperitoneally administered 30 min before acetic acid (0.6% v/v). Published online 21 April 2015
Then, the abdominal writhes were counted during a 25-min period.
For personal use only.
Results: EA (0.3–10 mg/kg, i.p.) and CBZ (3–30 mg/kg, i.p.) inhibited the writhing response
evoked by acetic acid. Fifty percent effective dose (ED50) values against this tonic pain were
1.02 mg/kg and 6.40 mg/kg for EA and CBZ, respectively. The antinociception induced by EA
showed higher potency than that of carbamazepine. Co-administration of increasing fractional
increments of ED50 values of EA and CBZ produced additive interaction against writhing
responses, as revealed by isobolographic analysis.
Discussion and conclusion: These results suggest that a combination of carbamazepine and
ellagic acid may be a new strategy for the management of neuropathic pain such as what
occurs in trigeminal neuralgia, since the use of carbamazepine is often limited by its adverse
effects and by reduction of its analgesic effect through microsomal enzyme induction.
that has been used as an analgesic to treat neuropathic pain, vehicles were given 30 min before acetic acid.
especially pain caused by trigeminal neuralgia. However, the Antinociceptive activity (reduction in writhes) was expressed
use of carbamazepine is often limited by its side effects such as percent maximum possible effect (%MPE) that was
as dizziness, somnolence, gait, and hematological abnormal- calculated by the following equation: %MPE ¼ [100 (mean
ities (Backonja, 2002; Jensen, 2002). Furthermore, the writhes in control group-mean writhes in drug(s) treated
chronic use of carbamazepine reduces its analgesic effect group)]/mean of writhes in control group (Jain et al., 2001).
due to liver microsomal enzyme induction (Benedetti et al., Eight to ten animals were used at each of the dose levels to
2005). It has been reported that the antinociceptive effect determine the ED50 value for a drug. The antinociceptive
of carbamazepine is potentiated when combined with anti- effects of EA (0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) and CBZ (3, 10, 20,
depressants such as fluvoxamine, imipramine, or milnacipran and 30 mg/kg) administered either alone or in combination
(Aoki et al., 2006). were studied.
Considering the studies mentioned above, the present study
was designed to elucidate the interaction of EA with the Isobolographic analysis
analgesic activity of carbamazepine using isobolographic
A graphical assessment of synergy was carried out using
analysis in the mouse acetic acid-induced writhing test.
isobolographic analysis. In the present study, the interaction
of antinociceptive effect of EA with CBZ was evaluated by
Pharmaceutical Biology Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 04/25/15
Results
Figure 3. Isobologram for the co-administration of ellagic acid (EA, i.p.)
Antinociceptive effects of EA and carbamazepine and carbamazepine (CBZ; i.p.) on acetic acid-induced writhing in mice.
Horizontal lines in the abscissa and the ordinate represent the S.E.M. of
Results showed that the intraperitoneal administration of
the corresponding ED50. Filled circles correspond to the theoretical and
ellagic acid (EA) and carbamazepine (CBZ) produced dose- experimental ED50 values with 95% confidence intervals.
dependent antinociception (Figure 1A and B, respectively).
The value of ED50 with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EA
was lower than the ED50 value for carbamazepine indicating EA with CBZ revealed that the experimental ED50 was 2.94
greater potency in antinociceptive effect of ellagic acid in the (1.14–4.74) mg/kg. This experimental ED50 value was below
test [ED50 values were 1.02 (0.86–1.19) and 6.40 (5.47–7.32) the additive line, and also statistical analysis demonstrated
mg/kg for EA and CBZ, respectively]. Animals treated that it was not significantly different from its correspond-
with ellagic acid did not show any significant behavioral or ing theoretical ED50 value (p40.05). Therefore, EA and CBZ
motor dysfunctions in locomotor activity assessment (data interacted in an additive fashion in the writhing test
not shown). (Figure 3).
with other analgesics could result in analgesia without the antinociceptive effects of this drug in the visceral pain model,
adverse effect associated with large-dose used. In the present it may suggest that the inflammatory nature of nociception in
study, carbamazepine and ellagic acid alone exhibited com- writhing and paw pressure tests leading to a facilitated state
parable dose-dependent antinociceptive activity in the acetic may be similar. It has been shown that activation of central
acid-induced writhing test. Also, co-administration of a adenosine A1 (Stepanovic-Petrovic et al., 2008) and adren-
carbamazepine with ellagic acid resulted in an additive ergic a2 (Vucvkovic et al., 2006) receptors and also inhibition
antinociceptive interaction. of tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in dorsal root
Previous studies suggested that the CNS depression and ganglion neurons (Brau et al., 2001) produced antinociception
the non-specific muscle relaxation effect can reduce the in the writhing test. Therefore, it could be suggested that the
response of motor coordination and might invalidate the peripheral and/or central component of nociceptive pathways
nociceptive test results (Santos et al., 2005). Ellagic acid has was involved in the antinociception produced by carbamaze-
little or no effect on motor function even at a dose as high as pine in writhing test.
30 mg/kg, when tested with both the open-field and also rota- In the present study, an isobolographic analysis revealed
rod tests (Mansouri et al., 2013, 2014). Therefore, the present additive interaction between carbamazepine and ellagic acid.
result indicates that ellagic acid may have antinociceptive There is no scientific evidence available to support the results
activity in mice. obtained in this work; however, such interaction has not been
Pharmaceutical Biology Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Nyu Medical Center on 04/25/15
In this study, we used the acetic acid writhing test as an studied previously in a valuable experiment. It should be
inflammatory pain model stimulus for acute nociception. In noticed that an additive interaction might be exhibited if
this test, acetic acid causes tissue damage and releases pain- fundamentally the activation of common mechanisms is
producing substances, including prostaglandins, which acti- simultaneously engaged in the antinociception of a combin-
vate peripheral nociceptors on the terminals of sensory nerve ation (Solomon & Gebhart, 1994). Therefore, ellagic acid and
fibers. Painful stimuli caused by acetic acid reach higher carbamazepine may act through a common pathway.
centers by a number of spinal nerve pathways. Thus, this Our study did not investigate the mechanisms involved in
nociceptive test is used for determining both central and the nature of interaction between ellagic acid and carbamaze-
peripheral analgesia (Le Bars et al., 2001; Satyanarayana pine. The observed addition may be related to a pharmaco-
et al., 2004). kinetic or pharmacodynamics interaction.
Flavonoids are shown to have neuroprotective, anxiolytic, Although synergism is optimal, to be clinically useful, a
For personal use only.
sedative, and anticonvulsant activities. The neuroprotective combination of drugs need not necessarily be synergistic but
effects of flavonoids, including ellagic acid, may be mediated needs only to allow exhibition of an increased desired clinical
through direct actions on enzymes, receptors, and signaling result with the same or a lower level of side effects compared
pathways (Spencer, 2009). with a single agent. Therefore, the results observed here may
A growing pieces of evidence indicated that ellagic acid is provide a theoretical basis for the development of a multi-
effective for altering acute visceral pain (Mansouri et al., targeted drug strategy to augment antinociception while
2013; Rogerio et al., 2006). Ellagic acid-induced antinocicep- preventing or reducing the untoward side effects of each
tion in the writhing test is also consistent with the ability of individual drug, thus enhancing analgesic efficacy. Further
this compound to reduce inflammation-induced nociception studies are needed to elucidate the detailed mechanisms of the
caused by a variety of inflammatory agents, such as potentiating effect of the combination of ellagic acid and
carrageenan and formalin (Gainok et al., 2011; Mansouri carbamazepine on the antinociceptive effect in mice, includ-
et al., 2014). The analgesic action of ellagic acid has been ing studies on the pharmacokinetic interactions between
explained by the inhibition of cyclooxygenase, which synthe- carbamazepine and ellagic acid.
sizes prostaglandins at the peripheral cell-damage sites
(El-Shitany et al., 2014; Rogerio et al., 2006). Moreover,
Conclusion
Beltz et al. (2008) demonstrated the antinociceptive effects of
EA in the hot-plate test. In our previous studies, we have In conclusion, isobolographic analysis indicated an additive
shown the central and peripheral antinociceptive effects of EA antinociceptive interaction between ellagic acid and carba-
which were mediated by opioid receptors and L-arginine/NO/ mazepine when administered systemically in an inflammatory
cGMP/ATP-sensitive K+ channel pathway using tail-flick, visceral pain model. Therefore, these findings suggest that co-
formalin, and writhing tests (Ghorbanzadeh et al., 2014; administration of ellagic acid with carbamazepine may be a
Mansouri et al., 2013, 2014). Further studies are needed to new strategy for managing neuropathic pain such as pain
elucidate the mechanism of the antinociceptive action of caused by trigeminal neuralgia, although further investiga-
ellagic acid. tions are necessary to elucidate this combination effect using
Carbamazepine is a well-known anticonvulsant drug which other methods evaluating antinociceptive actions.
is used for the management of bipolar affective disorders, as
well as trigeminal and glossopharyngeal neuralgias
Declaration of interest
(Stepanovic-Petrovic et al., 2008). Carbamazepine-induced
antinociception in the writhing test is consistent with the The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest. This
ability of this drug, in a paw pressure test, to reduce somatic research was financially supported by grants (PRC-115) from
nociception caused by proinflammatory agents (Bianchi et al., the Physiology Research Center, funded by the Vice
1995; Kawaura et al., 2011; Stepanovic-Petrovic et al., 2008). Chancellor of Research, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of
Although our results do not clarify the mechanism of the Medical Sciences (Iran).
DOI: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1025288 Interaction between ellagic acid and carbamazepine in pain 5