PT Final Exam Level-II (Specific)
PT Final Exam Level-II (Specific)
W 25
Level - II
➢ There are 20 questions in this question paper. Exam time is 40 minutes.
➢
➢
➢
➢
➢
Each Question have same weightage.
35
No negative marking, so try to attend every question.
This is open book exam; So given reference material can be used during exam.
Fill the proper circle (dark with Blue/Black pen) in answer sheet.
Mobile phone are not allowed during exam, Normal calculator can be used, Programmable calculator is
83
not allowed.
*Required
10
Name *
Your answer
80
Email ID *
Your answer
Mobile Number *
Your answer
1. The most likely result of a too short dwell time of an emulsifier is:
(a) A tendency to remove the penetrant from fine discontinuities
2. Diffusion of a lipophilic emulsifier penetrant into the test piece surface is stopped by:
W
(a) The conclusion of the emulsifier dwell time
25
(b) The penetrant
35
3. When using a post emulsifiable penetrant process, it is important to drain as much excess penetrant as
possible from the surface of a test piece which has been immersed in the penetrant because:
(a) Too much penetrant on the part surface may lead to more rapid penetration and over-sensitivity
83
(b) A thinner layer of penetrant is likely to have higher capillary action and, thus, be more sensitive to fine
discontinuities
(c) A thinner layer of penetrant will result in less penetrant contamination in the emulsifier tank
4. When a drain-dwell technique is used during emulsification, what two mechanisms are responsible for
combining the emulsifier and penetrant?
(a) Diffusion and turbulent mixing
80
5. When performing a post emulsifiable penetrant test, the test piece does not rinse acceptable clean
during normal processing. What should be done?
(a) Return the test piece to the emulsifier and repeat the step
(c) Remove the excess penetrant with solvent remover and process the remainder of the test normally
(d) Clean the test piece and re-process through the complete penetrant test process
6. The adequacy of excess penetrant removal, using water washable penetrant process, is judged and
controlled by:
(a) Water rinse time
W
7. Another name for a self-emulsifying penetrant process is:
25
(a) Solvent removable
(a) 35
8. Which of the following is a function of an emulsifier?
To draw penetrant out of a discontinuity and form a visible indication
83
(b) To increase the size of an indication through capillary action
(b) Blue-black
(c) White
80
W
(a) To obscure discontinuity indications
25
(b) To enhance discontinuity indications
(c) To avoid missing small flaw indications adjacent to areas of high bleed-out
(b) Non-corrosive
15. Why is the need for a dry surface prior to developer application more of a disadvantage with a dry
developer than with a non-aqueous wet developer?
(a) Because the dry developer only forms a thin film on the surface of the test piece
(b) Because the solvent in a non-aqueous wet developer penetrates deeper into discontinuities to contact
entrapped penetrant and draw it back out
(c) Because the warm test piece causes evaporation of the solvent in the non- aqueous developer
(b) Spraying
(c) Brushing
17. It is easier to control developer coating thickness with a soluble developer than a water suspendable
W
one because:
25
(a) Less developer can be dissolved that suspended in water
20. Fluorescent penetrant indications are more visible than colour contrast penetrant indications because:
(a) They reflect more light
(d) Yellow and green contrast more than red and white