0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

35th International Mathematical Olympiad: 1 2 M I J I J K 1 2 M

The document discusses two math problems presented at the 35th International Mathematical Olympiad in Hong Kong in 1994. The first problem involves proving an inequality relating sums and averages of distinct positive integers. The second problem involves proving that two lengths are equal if and only if a perpendicular is drawn in a diagram involving an isosceles triangle.

Uploaded by

Harshit Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

35th International Mathematical Olympiad: 1 2 M I J I J K 1 2 M

The document discusses two math problems presented at the 35th International Mathematical Olympiad in Hong Kong in 1994. The first problem involves proving an inequality relating sums and averages of distinct positive integers. The second problem involves proving that two lengths are equal if and only if a perpendicular is drawn in a diagram involving an isosceles triangle.

Uploaded by

Harshit Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

35th International Mathematical Olympiad

Hong Kong, July 1994.

1. Let m and n be positive integers. let a1 , a2 , . . ., am be distinct elements of {1, 2, . . . , n}


such that whenever ai + aj ≤ n for some i, j, 1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ m, there exists k, 1 ≤ k ≤ m,
with ai + aj = ak . Prove that
a1 + a2 + · · · + am n+1
≥ .
m 2

Soln. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a1 > a2 > · · · > am . We claim
that ai + am+1−i ≥ n + 1 for i = 1, . . . , m. The result then follows readily. To prove
the claim, we assume that on the contrary that it’s false. Thus there exists i such that
ai + am+1−i < n + 1 Then ai < ai + am < ai + am−1 < · · · < ai + am+1−i ≤ n. Thus
{ai + am , ai + am−1 , . . . , ai + am+1−i } ⊆ {a1 , a2 , . . . , ai−1 }
which is impossible. Thus the claim follows.

2. ABC is an isosceles triangle with AB = AC. Suppose that


(i) M is the midpoint of BC and O is the point on the line AM such that OB is perpen-
dicular to AB;
(ii) Q is an arbitrary point on the segment BC different from B and C;
(iii) E lies on the line AB and F lies on the line AC such that E, Q and F are distinct
and collinear.
Prove that OQ is perpendicular to EF if and only if QE = QF .

Soln. First assume that OQ is perpendicular to EF . Now OEBQ abd OCF Q are cyclic.
Hence ∠OEQ = ∠OBQ = ∠OCQ = ∠OF Q. It follows that QE = QF .
Suppose now that QE = QF and that the perpendicular through O to EF meet BC
at Q 6= Q. Draw the line through Q0 parallel to EF , meeting the lines AB and AC at E 0
0

and F 0 , respectively. Then Q0 E 0 = Q0 F 0 as before. Let AQ0 meet EF at N . Then N 6= Q


and N E = N F , so that QE 6= QF , a contradiction. So Q0 = Q.

A A
....... .......
......... ...........
... .. ... ....... ...
.... .... .... .... ........ ....
.. . ... .. .. . ...
... .... .... ... .. .. ....
.. ... ... .. .. ... ...
.. ... ... ... . . ... .... .... ...
.. ... ... .. . .. ...
.. .. .
. ... .... .... .... ...
.. . ..
. ... . .. .
. ..
. ...
... ... ... ... .. ..
. ...
.. .
. ... .. . ..
. ...
.
.. ... ... ..
. ..
. .. ...
.
... .
.
.. .
.
.
.
..
...
...
... ...
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.. ...
. ..
.
..
F
.... ....
.
.
..
........
. . . ..
... .. ..
F .
.. . . .. .
. ..... 0
...
.
. .
...
.. . ....
................
.. ... ... ...
..
. ..
..
. .
... ......
. ....
..
...
...... .. ..
F
............
...
.
. .
... ..
... ..
. .
.. ... ...
.... .
.... ............. ........... ..... .....
... ......... ... . ...
...
.. ...
. ... ...
..
N .. ....... .. ....... .... ...
.........
.
... ...... ............. ...
... .. ... Q .. ..
... ..
..
.. ...
.
M ..
.
.
.
...
...
... ... ..
...
Q ...
...
.......
...... .... ........... ....
. . M
.
.....
.
...
...
...
. . .. . .
. .. . . .... .
... . . .
. ..
B .
...
.
....... .....
.
..... .. .. .
. ...
.
..............................................................................................................................................
..
..... C B ..
.
.
.................................... ...............................................................................................................
. ........... .....
.
. 0.... ... ...
. .
. .
.. .
...
... C
.
...
.
. ..........
.
.. .. .
. ..
...... .............. .... .... ..... .............
. . .. .... . . ... . . .
... ....... ............. Q
.......... ........ .............. ..... .... .... .............
.......
...
.. ...... ....... ... .. .. ....... ....... ........... ....... ... .. ... .......
.
... ......
... .......... ...... .. ....
...................
.... .......... E ..
... ........
.. ...................
......................
......
........ .......................... ........ ..........................
............................. 0 .............................
E O E O
1
3. For any positive integer k, let f (k) be the number of elements in the set {k + 1, k +
2, . . . , 2k} whose base 2 representation has precisely three 1s.
(a) Prove that, for each positive integer m, there exists at least one positive integer k
such that f (k) = m.
(b) Determine all positive integers m for which there exists exactly one k with f (k) = m.

Soln. Let g(k) denote the number of elements in the set {1, . . . , n} whose binary repre-
sentation has exactly three ones. Then f (k) and g(k) are both increasing and f (k) =
g(2k) − g(k). Hence

f (k + 1) − f (k) = g(2k + 2) − g(k + 1) − g(2k) + g(k)


= g(2k + 2) − g(2k) − [g(k + 1) − g(k)]

Since either both 2k + 2 is counted in g(2k + 2) and k + 1 is counted in g(k + 1) or neither


is. Thus f (k + 1) − f (k) is either 1 or 0depending on where 2k + 1 is counted in g(2k + 1)
or not. Since f (2n ) = n+13 − n3 = n2 , the image of f is N ∪ {0}. This proves (a).
Let m be any positive integer for which there is only one k with f (k) = m. Then

f (k + 1) − f (k) = 1 = f (k) − f (k − 1).

The former means 2k + 1 is counted in g(2k + 2), or equivalently, the binary representation
of k has exactly two ones. The same holds for k − 1. This happens only when the last two
digits of k − 1 are 01. In other words, k = 2n + 2. But

f (2n + 2) = g(2n+1 + 4) − g(2n + 2)


= 1 + g(2n+1 − g(2n )
 
n
=1+
2

Thus the answer is any number of the form 1 + n2 , n ≥ 2.




4. Determine all ordered pairs (m, n) of positive integers such that

n3 + 1
mn − 1
is an integer.

Soln. Note that mn − 1 and m3 are relatively prime. That mn − 1 dividing n3 + 1 is


therefore equivalent to mn − 1 dividing m3 (n3 + 1) = m3 n3 − 1 + m3 + 1, which is in turn
3
equivalent to mn−1 dividing m3 +1. If m = n, we have nn2 −1 +1 1
= n+ n−1 . This is an integer
2
if and only if n = 2. We now consider the case m > n. If n = 1, m−1 is an integer. This is
so if and ly if m = 2, 3. Suppose n ≥ 2. Note that n3 + 1 ≡ 1 (mod n) while mn − 1 ≡ −1

2
3 3
n +1
(mod n). Hence mn−1 = kn − 1 for some positive integer k. Now kn − 1 < nn2 −1
+1 1
= n + n−1
1
or (k − 1)n < 1 + n−1 . Hence k = 1, so that n3 + 1 = (mn − 1)(n − 1). This yields
2
m = nn−1
+1 2
= n + 1 + n−1 , which is an integer if and only if n = 2, 3. In each case, we have
m = 5. In summary, there are 9 solutions, namely

(2, 2), (2, 1), (3, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 5), (3, 5)

the last 4 obtained by symmetry.

5. Let S be the set of real numbers strictly greater than −1. Find all functions f : S → S
satisfying the two conditions:
(i) f (x) + f (y) + xf (y) = y + f (x) + yf (x) for all x and y in S;
f (x)
(ii) x is strictly increasing on each of the intervals −1 < x < 0 and 0 < x.

Soln. Conditionm (ii) implies that f (x) = x has at most three solutions, one in (−1, 0),
one equal to 0 and the third in (0, ∞).
Suppose f (u) = u for some u ∈ (−1, 0). Setting x = y = u in (i), we get

f (u2 + 2u) = u2 + 2u ∈ (−1, 0).

This means u2 + 2u = u. But then u 6∈ (−1, 0). The case f (v) = v for some v > 0 leads to
a similar contradiction.
However, f (x+(1+x)f (x)) = x+(1+x)f (x) for all x ∈ S. So we have x+(1+x)f (x) =
x
0 which gives f (x) = − 1+x .
x
It’s routine to check that f (x) = − 1+x satisfies the desired property.

6. Show that there exists a set A of positive integers with the following property: For
any infinite set S of primes there exist two positive integers m ∈ A and n 6∈ A each of
which is a product of k distinct elements of S for some k ≥ 2.

Soln. Let A be the of all positive integers of the form q1 q2 . . . qq1 where q1 < q2 < · · · <
qq1 are primes. For any infinite set S = {p1 , p2 , p3 , . . .} of primes with p1 < p2 < · · ·,
we can satisfy he requirement of the problem by taking k = p1 , m = p1 p2 · · · pk and
n = p2 p3 · · · pk+1 .

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy