The document discusses test development and different types of tests. It provides information on:
1) The process of developing a test which includes conceptualization, construction, tryout, analysis, and revision.
2) The difference between norm-referenced tests which compare test performance to a norm group, and criterion-referenced tests which compare performance to a predetermined standard.
3) Types of item formats, scales, and norms used in test construction and analysis.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views
REVIEWER
The document discusses test development and different types of tests. It provides information on:
1) The process of developing a test which includes conceptualization, construction, tryout, analysis, and revision.
2) The difference between norm-referenced tests which compare test performance to a norm group, and criterion-referenced tests which compare performance to a predetermined standard.
3) Types of item formats, scales, and norms used in test construction and analysis.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
Test Development A good item on a nrt is an item from which high
scorers on the test respond correctly, low
Process of Developing a test: scorers respond to that same item incorrectly; 1. Conceptualization same as crt. 2. Construction Pilot Work 3. Tryout 4. Analysis - Pilot study or research 5. Revision - To evaluate whether they should be included in the final form. I. Test Conceptualization - Developer typically attempts to - Emerging social phenomenon determine how best measure a or pattern of behavior might targeted construct. Creation serve as the stimulus for the revision and deletion of many development of a new test. items are part of the process. - May be in response to a need to II. Test Construction assess mastery in an emerging - Generally concerned with occupation or profession. turning performance into numbers. The difference of norm and criterion is based on the scores. Some tests can provide both results. Scaling
- May be defined as the process
of setting rules for assigning Criterion Referenced Tests numbers in measurement. - Compare a person’s knowledge - The process by which a or skills against a measuring device is designed predetermined standard, cut and calibrated. score or other criterion. - Which scale values are assigned - The performance of other to different amounts of the students does not affect a trait, attribute, or characteristic student’s score. being measured.
Norm Referenced Tests Types of Scales
- Compare a person’s knowledge Age-based scale – if the test taker’s test
or skills to the knowledge or performance as a function of age is of critical skills of the norm group. interest. - Norm groups – age, race, etc. Grade-based scale – As a function of - Individual percentile rank grade. describes their performance in comparison to the norm, but Stanine Scale – Transformed into scores does not indicate whether or that can range from 1 to 9. not they met or exceed a specific standard. Writing Items - Binary Choice Item – Two possible responses only. - What range of content should the items cover? - Which of the many different Constructed-response format types of item formats should be employed? - Completion Item – Provide a - How many items should be word or phrase to complete a written in total and for each sentence. content area covered? - Short Answer – A word, a term, a sentence, or a paragraph. When devising a standardized test using a - Essay – Respond to a question multiple-choice format – twice the number of by writing a composition, items. typically one that demonstrates Item pool recall of facts, etc. o Depth of Knowledge. - Reservoir - Will or will not be drawn for the final version PARAMETIC TEST Clinical setting – clinicians, patients, patients’ - Makes assumptions about the family members, clinical staff. population Personnel psychologists – members of a - Uses a normal probabilistic targeted industry or organization. distribution - Uses a mean value for the School Psychologists – teachers, administrative central tendency staff, educational psychologists. - Requires previous knowledge Item Format about the population - Interval and ratio - Variables such as the form, plan structure, arrangement, and NONPARAMETIC TEST layout of individual test items. - Doesn’t make any assumptions. Item Format - The distribution is arbitrary. - Uses the median value for the 1. Selected-response format central tendency. 2. Constructed-response format - Doesn’t require previous Selected-response format knowledge about the population. - Multiple choice – Choose one - Nominal and Ordinal or more items - True or False Norms - Matching Type – Determine - Refers to the performances by which response is best defined groups on particular associated with which premise tests. - Norms are established by - Norm Referenced – To derive determining what persons in a meaning from a test score is to representative group actually evaluate the test score in do on the test relation to other scores on the same test. Types of Norms Criterion Referenced Test – Test that describes - Percentile – raw data from a the specific types of skills, tasks or knowledge of test’s standardization sample an individual relative to a well-defined criterion. converted to percentile form - Age norms – age-equivalent TYPES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS scores, indicate the average - According to the number of performance of different test takers: samples of test takers who were o Individual Testing- one at various ages the time the test person was administered. o Group testing – one or - Grade norms – Indicate the average test performance of more person. test takers in a given school - To the Variable being grade. measured: - National norms – Derived from o Ability tests a normative sample that was Achievement – nationally representative of the degree of population at the time the learning norming study was conducted. Aptitude – - National Anchor norms – potential for provide some stability to test learning or scores by anchoring them to acquiring a other test scores. specific skill. - Subgroup norms – Can be Intelligence – segmented by any of the person’s criteria initially used in selecting general subjects for the sample. potential to - Local norms – Provide solve problem normative information with and profit from respect to local’s population’s experience. performance on some test. Personality - Tracking - tendency to stay at tests about the same level relative to Objective – usually in a self-report format the one’s peers. require the subject to choose between two or - Fixed Reference Group Scoring more response such as true or false. Systems Norms – provide a context for interpreting the Projective – tests’ stimulus subject’s response meaning of a test score. ambiguous. The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire between examinees who are (16PF) is a self-report personality test knowledgeable and those who developed over several decades of empirical are not. research by Raymond B. Cattell, Maurice Types of discrimination index Tatsuoka and Herbert Eber. - Zero discrimination - equal - Positive “– upper group answers ITEM ANALYSIS the item correctly than the lower. - A process which examines - Negative “- lower group examinee responses to answers the item correctly than individual test items in order to the upper. assess the quality of those items.
Tool tests:
- Item-difficulty index - Item-reliability index - Item-validity index - Item-discrimination index
Item Difficulty index D = (U-L)/ n
- Indicates the proportion of test- U – correct answer in high takers who got the item right. - High percentage – easy item. L – “low - Low percentage – difficult item. N – number of examinees P = R/N x 100 Other Considerations in Item Analysis R – number of test takers •Guessing – consider the following N – total number of test-taker three criteria that any correction for guessing must meet as well as the P – percent of people passing an item interacting problems that must be addressed.
• Item fairness – biased item –
favors one particular group of examinees in relation to another. ICC can be used.
• Speed test – under speed
conditions yield misleading or The Item-Discrimination Index uninterpretable result.
- Is a measure of how well an Qualitative Item Analysis
item is able to distinguish - The examiner carefully - Examiners may be involved to proofreads the test before it is greater or lesser degrees in final administered. scoring of protocols. - Anchor protocol – Scored by a highly authoritative scorer that is designed as a model. - Scoring Drift – Discrepancy Expert Panels between anchor and scoring of - Find the information provided another protocol. by the experts. 3 of many applications of IRT: Sensitivity Review • Evaluating existing tests for the - Study of test items, typically purpose of mapping test revisions conducting during the test •Determining measurement development process. equivalence across test takers - Fairness to all prospective test population takers. •Developing item banks - Presence of offensive language, stereotypes.
Test Revision OBJECTIVE TEST
- Characterize each item to its - Can be objectively scored and
strength and weaknesses whose meaning or purpose is - Highly reliable but lack criterion hidden from subjects. validity. - A psychological test that measures an individual’s Cross-Validation or Co-Validation characteristics in a way that isn’t influenced by the - Cross validation - Refers to the examiner’s own beliefs. revalidation of a test on a - EXAMPLES: sample of test takers other than - •Myers-Briggs Type Indicator those on whom test (MBTI) performance originally found to •Neo Pi-R be valid predictor. •Minnesota Multiphasic - Validity Shrinkage – Decrease in Personality Inventory (MMPI) item validities. •16 PF - Co-validation – conducted on PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES two or more test using the same sample of test takers. - Application of vague, - Co-norming – Conjunction with unstructured stimulus objects or situations in order to the criterion of norms or the manifest the individual’s revision of existing norms. characteristics modes of Quality assurance perceiving his world. - Theoretical concept - Projective Construction Technique - Creating of An techniques originated from Imaginable Production for which The Test psychoanalytic theory Materials Provide a Frame Work Ex: Thematic Apperception Test-TAT, Fairy Tale Test. Francis Galton (1879): Utilize word association method for measuring intelligence. Expressive technique does not depend on test stimuli, but rather ask the subject to perform an Kraepelin (1892): Used Association method for artistic or creative action studying effects of fatigue, hunger etc. Carl Jung: The first to formulate a standardized word association projective test. Murray and Morgan (1935): Developed Thematic Apperception Test in 1935 in USA. Sentence completion technique: flourished in 1920s, brought into concern in 1950s. A stem of sentence was given and the second part was free to fill in. Goodenough and Harris (1930s): ‘Expressed drawings’ as a supplementary measure of intelligence. Buck (1949): Developed House-Tree-Person Test, which consist of drawings of a house, a tree and some persons. Karen Machover (1949): Utilize Draw-A-Person Test for the purpose of personality assessment. Projective test – assumed that an individual’s responses to an unstructured stimulus are influenced by his needs, motives, fears, expectations, and concerns.
Intelligence – The ability to learn from
experience, solve problems, and use of knowledge to adapt to new experiences. Elements: Association Technique: It Inquires the Subject - Abstract thinking and reasoning to state What Is Suggested by A Verbal, Visual, - Problem solving ability Or Auditory Stimuli. Ex: Word Association, - Capacity to acquire knowledge Rorschach Ink-blot Test - Memory - Adaptation to one’s Intelligence Quotient Terman coined the term environment “Intelligence Quotient” (IQ) in 1916 Developed - Mental Speed Intelligence Quotient IQ = (MA/CA)*100 - Linguistic Competence MA= Mental Age ; CA = Chronological Age Factor Analysis – is a statistical analysis method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables called factor. Spearman’s two factor theory ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON IQ
General Factor – “mental energy” - Factors that enhance IQ:
▸ Stimulating environment - Abstract reasoning, problem ▸ Good medical care/nutrition solving ▸ Parental involvement in Specific Factor – Less complex tasks learning ▸ Rich language environment - Motor speed, attention, v-m coordination, memory Factors that negatively impact IQ: High positive correlations – highly saturated - Persistent poverty with G. - Perinatal complications, Low or moderate viewed as measures of S such - Inadequate stimulation in as visual or motor ability. environment - lead exposure Thurstone’s theory of primary mental abilities - Large family size - Spatial Ability - Nutrition during gestation and - Verbal Comprehension early childhood - Word fluency - Perceptual speed - Numerical ability - Inductive reasoning - Memory Cattell and Horn’s fluid and crystallized intelligence Fluid – inborn abilities Crystallized – acquired skills Piaget’s theory of development - Intelligence may be conceived of as a kind of evolving biological adaptation to the outside world. - Two basic mental operations: assimilation and accomodation.
A Web Based Introduction to Programming Essential Algorithms Syntax and Control Structures Using Php Html and Mariadb MySQL Mike O’Kane All Chapters Instant Download