Crucible C
Crucible C
Caden Eiserman
Mr.Smith
E Block
4/13/23
Civil Disobedience
In the essay “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau, believes that the way of standing up to
societal norms isn't through direct protesting, but by simply disobeying. “I say break the law let
your life be a center-friction to stop the machine.” (Thoreau). What Thoreau means is that in
order to stop the machine “the government” and their injustices, they must break the laws to
cause a disturbance in the normal order of how everything works, in hopes that this causes
attention to their intentions and it can be considered to make a change. This is demonstrated in
when he says, “Those who call themselves, Abolitionists should at once effectively withdraw
their support, both in person and property” (Thoreau). When they take away their “person and
property” they mean they disclude themself from the issue and make sure they aren't contributing
to what issues they wish to change. Although some might feel strongly about these issues, “They
take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to.” (Thoreau).
According to Thoreau's beliefs, there isn't enough time in a man's life to physically protest and
cause a big deal over something they wish to change. He believes with persistence and
consistency they can make a more impactful change for society. In the play “The Crucible” by
Arthur Miller, his strategies throughout The Crucible are shown as more hands-on and are bolder
then what Thoreau would seem acceptable. “I have laid seven babies un-baptized in the
earth. Believe me, sir, you never saw more hearty babies born, And yet, each would wither in my
arms the very night of their birth. I have spoken nothing, but my heart has clamored intimations.”
Eiserman 2
(Miller 15). In this time period, being religious and a part of the church was the most important
thing, and if not you would be looked down upon. Knowing this, Proctor and Elizabeth still
refused to get their children baptized because of their personal opinions towards reverend Paris
and didn't want him to go near their children. Similar to the ideal of standing up to their beliefs
even when they know it's wrong proctor says, “I will not deal in lies, Mister! Proctor is
motionless. You will give me your honest confession in my hand, or I cannot keep you from the
rope. Proctor does not reply. Which way do you go, Mister? His breast heaving, his eyes staring,
Proctor tears the paper and crumples it, and he is weeping in fury, but erect.” (Miller 144). Even
when faced with death or humiliation, Proctor chooses that his reputation is much more
important than his life. Miller's way of dealing with injustices throughout the crucible was seen
as straightforward and more controversial than what the town of Salem would seem acceptable.
Both the essay “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau and the play “The Crucible” by Arthur
Miller, show similarities in their goals to distinguish injustices throughout their government
systems while showing different approaches towards how they should handle it. Comparing both
Thoreau and Miller, Thoureas's strategy for breaking injustices is to not do anything at all. He
believes that with enough time and support the “machine” or the government and their ways will
become outnumbered and can force them to reconsider their ways. Miller shows examples of
doing the opposite of what Thoreau would believe is necessary to get the job done, instead of not
doing anything at all, John Proctor a character from the play, fights for his rights and stands up to
anything or anybody he might disagree with. While both opinions defer, both have strong
reasoning and tactics that can lead them to their goal of breaking injustices.
Eiserman 3
Rubric
Skill Not Foundational Proficient Advanced
Yet
Shows evidence of
proofreading