Ultra Wide-Band Technology (UWB) : By: Mustafa Khaleel
Ultra Wide-Band Technology (UWB) : By: Mustafa Khaleel
(UWB)
By: Mustafa Khaleel
Contents
Introduction to UWB
Narrowband, Wideband, and Ultra-Wideband
UWB Signal
Single Band and a Multi Band
UWB Modulation Schemes
Transceiver Architecture
UWB antennas
UWB-MIMO
Applications
Standardization
Advantages - Limitations
Ultra Wide Band (UWB)
Ultra Wide Band (UWB) is a technology for the transmission data by using techniques which cause a spreading of
the radio energy over a very wide frequency band.
with a very low power spectral density. The low power spectral density limits the interference potential with
conventional radio systems (TV, GSM, UMTS, GPS, etc.).
and the high bandwidth can allow very high data throughput for communications devices, or high precision for
location and imaging devices.
UWB radios can use frequencies from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz in USA and Asia and at least 6.0 to 8.5 GHz in Europe.
The Federal Communications Commission in USA (FCC) has defined an UWB device as any device with a –10 dB
fractional bandwidth, greater than 20% or occupying at least 500 MHz of the spectrum
Most narrowband systems occupy less than 10% of the center frequency bandwidth, and are transmitted at far
greater power levels.
the FCC introduced severe broadcast power restrictions for UWB in order not interference other narrower band
systems nearby, such as 802.11a/g radio.
Narrowband, Wideband, and Ultra-Wideband
We can classify signal as Narrowband, Wideband, and Ultra-wideband by Fractional bandwidth and is defined by
the ratio of bandwidth at –10 dB points to center frequency or The fractional bandwidth is defined as the radio of
signal bandwidth to the center frequency.
The –10 dB point represents the spectral power of a signal at 10 dB lower than its peak power.
𝒇𝒉 −𝒇𝒍
𝑩𝒇 = 𝟐 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎% Narrowband 𝑩𝒇 < 1%
𝒇𝒉 +𝒇𝒍
Wideband 1% < 𝑩𝒇 < 20%
Ultra-Wideband 𝑩𝒇 > 20%
UWB-Signal
UWB systems use carrier less, short-duration (picosecond to nanosecond) pulses with a very low duty cycle (less than 0.5
percent) for transmission and reception of the information.
And duty cycle is the ratio of the time that a pulse is present to the total transmission time.
𝑇𝑜𝑛
𝐷𝑢𝑡𝑦 𝐶𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒 =
𝑇𝑜𝑛 + 𝑇𝑜𝑓𝑓
𝑡 −(𝑡 )2
𝑃 𝑡 = 𝑒 𝜏
𝜏
where represents 𝒕 time and 𝝉 is a time decay constant that determines the temporal width of the pulse
In Figure above 500-picosecond pulse generates a large bandwidth in the frequency domain with a center frequency
of 2 GHz.
the lowest and highest cutoff frequencies at –10 dB are approximately 1.2 GHz and 2.8 GHz, respectively, which lead
to a fractional bandwidth of 80 percent; this is much larger than the minimum required by the FCC:
𝟐.𝟖−𝟏.𝟐
𝑩𝒇 = 𝟐 × 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = 𝟖𝟎%
𝟐.𝟖+𝟏.𝟐
Single Band and Multi Band
The Single Band (Direct-Sequence UWB (DS-UWB)) : The Multi Band OFDM(MB-OFDM) approach
supports the idea of impulse radio that is the original divides the available UWB frequency spectrum
approach to UWB by using narrow pulses that occupy a (3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz) into multiple smaller and no
large portion of the spectrum. overlapping bands with bandwidths greater than
500 MHz .
The UWB transceiver architecture is considerably less complicated than that of the narrowband transceiver.
The transmission of low-powered pulses eliminates the need for a power amplifier
There are Several Classes Of Transceivers ,
The Coherent Transceivers:
On the transmitter side, the pulse generator has to control the transmitted pulse shape
finely and is generally able to handle its polarity.
On the other side, the receiver is able to estimate the composite channel impulse
response.
This estimation is then used as a comparison pattern to demodulate the received signal
and all modulation schemes can be used.
Correct operation of the transceiver is ensured by a good quality time base on both the
transmitter and receiver sides.
The Non-coherent Transceivers
It is generally less efficient but more attractive if cost or power consumption
Signal detection is based on energy detection performed on the incoming signal.
Time base requirements are generally relaxed, allowing the use of low cost oscillators.
where 𝑓𝑜 , 𝑓𝐻, and 𝑓𝐿 are the center frequency and the upper and lower
Antenna Arrays
In UWB radar applications, linear and planar antenna arrays may be formed with very sparsely spaced
elements.
high resolution phased array antennas, with a beam which may be readily steered.
The ratio of the wideband peak side lobe level to the peak main lobe level is a function of the number
of antenna elements rather than the element spacing.
There are several antenna topologies or types that are using in UWB such as horn antenna ,
Biconical antenna ,Helix antenna ,Bowtie antenna ,spiral antenna.
Advantages
UWB technology has very high potential in real life applications, due to its high bandwidth
and low power.
Very interesting application in wireless content transfer, especially for HD videos.
Secure transmission, low probability of interception or detection and anti-jam immunity.
Limitations
Emissions below conventional level.
Not appropriate for a WAN (Wide Area Network) deployment such as
wireless broadband access.
Thank You!
Reference
1) Advancement in Microstrip Antennas with Recent Applications,Chapter 6,UWB Antennas for Wireless Applications,Osama Haraz and Abdel-Razik Sebak.
2) Linardou, I., Migliaccio, C., Laheurte, J. M., & Papiernik, A. (1997). Twin Vivaldi an‐ tenna fed by coplanar waveguide. Electron. Lett., 33(22), 1835-1837.
3) Kim, S. G., & Chang, K. (2004). Ultra Wideband Exponentially-Tapered Antipodal Vivaldi Antennas. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, Monterey, CA, June, 3, 2273-2276.
4) Sibille, A. (2005). Compared Performance of UWB Antennas for Time and Frequency Domain Modulation. 28th URSI General Assembly, NewDelhi, India.
5) Licul, S, Noronha, J. A. N., Davis, W. A., Sweeney, D. G., Anderson, C. R., & Bielawa, T. M. (2003). A parametric study of time-domain characteristics of possible UWB an‐tenna architectures. IEEE
58th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2003-Fall, Octo‐ ber, 5, 6-9.
6) Su, S. W., Wong, K. L., & Tang, C. L. (2004). Ultra-wideband square planar monopole antenna for IEEE 802.16a operation in the 2-11 GHz band. Microwave Opt. Tech-nol. Lett., 42(6), 463-466,
Sept.
7) Kenny, S. Ryu, & Ahmed, A. Kishk. (2009). UWB Antenna with Single or Dual Bandnotches for Lower WLAN Band and Upper WLAN Band. IEEE Transactions on Anten‐ nas and Propagations, 57(12),
3942-3950, DEC.
8) Ultrawideband Antennas: Design and Applications.
9) Introduction to Ultra Wideband for Wireless Communications.
10) Ultra-Wideband: Past, Present and Future ,White Paper Presented by the EUWB consortium 2011-06-09.
11) UWB Theory and Applications,Ian Oppermann, Matti Hamalainen and Jari Iinatti All of CWC, University of Oula, Finland, 2004 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
12) Essentials of UWB,Stephen Wood Roberto Aiello, Cambridge University Press 2008.
13) Introduction to Ultra-Wideband Communications,Nekoogar.book,August 2005.
14) A Comparison between Ultra-Wideband and Narrowband Transceivers,David Barras1, Frank Ellinger and Heinz Jäckel Laboratory for Electronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH),
Zurich, Switzerland.
15) ULTRA WIDEBAND SYSTEMS WITH MIMO,Thomas Kaiser and Feng Zheng ,Leibniz University of Hannover, Germany, 2010 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.