Standardized Testing
Standardized Testing
Stalee Diehl
Ottawa University
STANDARDIZED TESTING 2
Abstract
The topic of whether standardized testing is effective and if it is helping or hurting students is
something that has been discussed and researched numerous times and it will be discussed in this
paper. The purpose of this paper is to understand and figure out if standardized testing is really
helping or hurting students and teachers and if it is truly effective. Throughout this paper, the
history of why standardized testing ever started and the purpose of it will be discussed. Along
with looking at the benefits of testing, and why so many people believe it to be effective and
helpful. We will also look at the disadvantages of testing and provide more knowledge so that
anyone can be more informed of why it is actually not effective. There will also be information
over how testing effects the way students act in the classroom, how the atmosphere changes, the
stress that it puts on teachers and the issues that they run into a lot, along with how it is effecting
parents. This paper will also look at some studies that have been done to convince people that
there are other, better, tests that child should take that would be more effective and helpful to
them in life outside of school. The direction intended from this paper is to show that standardized
testing is not effective and is hurting students and teachers more than helping them. There will be
Introduction
There have been many studies done when it comes to standardized testing and if it is effective or
not or if it is helping or hurting students and teachers. There are a lot of things to consider when
deciding if standardized testing should be kept in schools. Although the advantages to the testing
are great and do make since the disadvantages outweigh them. There have also been many
studies done to prove that standardized testing stresses people out and causes more problems
rather than helping out schools. There should still be testing but more of a critical thinking test
Early History
Standardized testing has been a part of American education since the mid-1800s.
(procon, 2016) The use of standardized testing became more meaningful and mandatory after the
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002 in all fifty states. Before this act, the point of
standardized testing was to create admissions for the United States in the northeastern elite
universities, along with being used in the top boarding schools for standardized curriculum. It
also was used for immigration, to test what they knew and their social abilities. It was originally
made of essays and not so much a widespread of questions over certain topics.
In 1915, The Kansas Silent Read Test was known to be the first and earliest published
multiple choice test, that was developed by Frederick J. Kelly. (procon, 2016) In 1934 after
many years of multiple choice testing Reynold Johnson made the first machine that could read
the answers of a No. 2 pencil, which helped a lot when it came to grading these standardized
tests. President Lyndon Johnson began the modern testing movement with Elementary and
Secondary Act in1965. It consisted of provisions in effort to raise the standards and make
STANDARDIZED TESTING 4
education more equitable. Then in 1983 there was the release of A Nation at Risk: The
Imperative for Educational Reform. The point of it was to make everyone aware that it was
important for academic standards to be raised within the United States. People then were
pressing for more strict measures within tests and increased the amount of testing that was done.
The No Child Left Behind Act was soon signed into law in 2002 like said earlier, by George W
Bush in January. This consisted of mandated testing in reading and math and science to follow
soon after throughout third graders to eighth graders and then for the final time in tenth grade.
With this testing schools had to show sufficient adequate yearly progress or they faced sanctions
and even the risk of being shut down or taken over by the state. It was required that all students
had to be proficient when it came to reading and math testing by 2014. With Bushs program the
states and federal government were spending around ten million dollars when it came to
preparing for standardized testing. President Barack Obama program Race to the Top was signed
into law in February 2009. This was made so states could compete for a $4.35 billions of extra
Advantages
standardized testing. For instance, they found that it holds schools and teachers more
accountable, they are required to teach students what is on the tests. The scores of these tests are
documented so teachers want to make sure their students do well on them so they dont get a bad
reputation in the teaching industry. The standardized testing programs also give teachers
guidelines so they know what to teach and when. It also gives parents an idea of how well their
kids are doing in school and if they have improved as the years progress. Standardized testing
also allows colleges or other facilities to compare two different scores from two students that are
STANDARDIZED TESTING 5
in completely different states, because every test is the same. This also helps when it comes to
students transferring to a new school, all the guidelines that are given to the teachers are the same
and every grade should be learning the same thing, so it makes the adjustment easier when it
comes to academics. Also, when the tests are being graded it is multiple choice and usually done
by a computer so there can be no favoritism. When the tests are being graded, they are also being
put into sub-groups. This helps schools so they are able to see what students are scoring and can
Disadvantages
University was able to evaluate some of those. Standardized testing causes teachers to only
teach to the test. (Columbia, 2013). This is causing students to be in school all day in an
environment that is not fun to learn in. But, teachers focus on teaching their students what is
going to be on the test mainly because their career depends on how well their students do. ( )
The testing also only evaluates a students performance on one day and no matter how well or
bad they do on the test no one is able to see how much progress they made throughout the year
leading up to the test. Many of the students also develop test anxiety which hinders
performance. (Derrick Meador, 2016). Along with that there are many other factors that could
happen to make a student unprepared for their testlike having an argument with their
parents. (Derrick Meador, 2016). Standardized testing is also causing a lot of stress for students
and teachers. There has been a number of excellent teachers who quit the profession every day
because of how much stress is on them to prepare students to perform well. (Derrick Meador,
2016). A study done by Concordia University shares that multiple-choice tests are too
simplistic, while advocates note that technology improvements feature items that demand more
STANDARDIZED TESTING 6
critical thinking before choosing a response. (Concordia University, 2017). They also share how
open-ended questions make students use their critical thinking to answer questions and that is
what they will have to deal with when they are no longer in school.
There are many studies done to show that critical thinking tests should take place of the
standardized testing. If that were to happen it would prepare students to be able to make
decisions in life outside of school. Of course, it is important to make sure students learn the basic
math science and reading subjects and be tested over them, but it shouldnt be such a huge
problem in our world today. The answer is to make more critical thinking tests.
Conclusion
After evaluating both aspects of standardized testing and the problems that it causes
within so many people it is important that we opt it out. Students should be tested over things
that require critical thinking skills and not have to spend almost every year memorizing things so
their teacher does not get fired. Also, the standardized testing is not preparing students for life
outside of school. Wherever they go they are going to have to make their own decisions because
Why Standardized Tests Don't Measure Educational Quality. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar99/vol56/num06/Why-
Standardized-Tests-Don%27t-Measure-Educational-Quality.aspx
STANDARDIZED TESTING 7
Berger, B. (2013, April 11). Don't Teach to the Test. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2013/04/11/why-excessive-standardized-testing-is-
causing-american-schools-to-fail
Chira, S. (1992, October 15). Study Finds Standardized Tests May Hurt Education Efforts.
standardized-tests-may-hurt-education-efforts.html
Chism, T. (2014, November 03). Standardize Testing Hurting American Students Reading,
Writing, and Researching in a Digital World Medium. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from
https://medium.com/reading-writing-in-a-digital-world/genre-piece-1-279e8f927905
University, M. S. (n.d.). Standardized testing hurting U.S. education, new book contends.
us-education-new-book-contends/
Meador, D. (n.d.). What You Need to Know About Standardized Testing. Retrieved April 11,
3194596
Top 10 Reasons to Oppose Common Core. (n.d.). Retrieved April 11, 2017, from
http://www.freedomworks.org/content/top-10-reasons-oppose-common-core
STANDARDIZED TESTING 8
Nieto, S. (2015). Still Teaching in Spite of It All. Educational Leadership 72, no. 6: 54-59.