U5: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY The Milgram Experiment
U5: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY The Milgram Experiment
Talk to your children about peer pressure. Explain what a powerful force it can be, and ... tell them
that you will never accept the excuse that "Everyone did it" ... that they will be held responsible for
their actions. (Tom McMahon, Teen Tips) Discuss.
Between 1961 and 1962, Stanley Milgram (1933-1984), an American
experimental psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of experiments on
conformity and obedience to authority. The findings of the Eichmann trial in
Jerusalem had triggered Milgram, then a doctoral student, to set out to find a test
that would prove that certain races or cultures are more aggressive than others.
Initially, he devised the test to see if a US ordinary citizen would voluntarily
electrocute someone they did not know. The major results of the pilot test were
most disturbing, showing people have the capability to destroy another unknown
human if presented with the tools and power to use them. I found so much
obedience, Milgram said, I hardly saw the need for taking the experiment to
Germany.
His subjects (ordinary citizens recruited through newspaper advertisements
offering $4 for one hour's participation in a "study of memory") were assigned the
role of "teacher" and asked to read a series of word pairs to another subject, or
learner, actually an actor who always played this role due to a rigged vote.
Whenever the learner made a mistake, the teacher-subject was instructed to
administer punishment in the form of electric shock on an increasing scale from
low to lethal by an authority figure or employer. The teacher-subject watched as
the learner was strapped into a chair and an electrode was attached to the learner's
wrist. The teacher was encouraged by the experimenters to continue to administer
the shocks. Milgram found that 65 % of the subjects would continue to do what
they were told, even if the learners could be heard pleading and screaming, and
concluded that most people will follow the instructions of an authority figure as
long as they considered the holder of power as legitimate.
The dilemma inherent in submission to authority is ancient, as old as the story
of Abraham, and the question of whether one should obey when commands conflict
with conscience has been argued by Plato, dramatized in Antigone, and treated to
philosophic analysis in almost every historical epoch. Conservative philosophers
argue that the very fabric of society is threatened by disobedience, while humanists
stress the primacy of the individual conscience.
The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous import, but
they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a
simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen
would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an
experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects' strongest
moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects' ears ringing with
the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme
willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority
constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding
explanation.
Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility
on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even
when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear and they are asked
to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality,
relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.
Stanley Milgram, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (1974) Adapted from
http://www.vidyaonline.net/arvindgupta/milgram.pdf, Accessed 15.07.2008
New Vocabulary
(research-related
words)
experiment =
controlled test/
investigation
conduct = carry out
subject(s) = case/
guinea pig
pilot test = a test
exemplifying a
contemplated series
finding(s) = results
Prefixes
unknown
incompatible
Suffixes
primacy
philosophic
Synonyms
conformity=
obedience=
submission
ancient=old
chief=major
Phrasal verbs
to set out
to pit against
to go to (any) length
A. Combine the following sentences to obtain a coherent text. Use your knowledge as to patterns that
add variety.
1. Milgram set up a simple experiment.
The experiment is at Yale University.
He wanted to test ordinary citizens.
The test was about how much pain ordinary citizens would inflict on others.
Ordinary citizens were ordered by an experimental scientist.
2. Milgrams experiments show that Nazi crimes are not difficult to understand.
Milgram suggested that one of the factors was propensity.
The factor was major.
The propensity belonged to the human beings.
The propensity was to obey authorities.
The propensity to obey was wrong.
3. Milgrams experiment was repeated dozens of times.
It was repeated with many different groups of people.
The results were always the same.
Most people will obey external authority.
The authority is over the dictates of conscience.
4. Research has suggested that obedience is not inevitable.
The research is more recent.
The research is on obedience.
The obedience is to authority.
The authority is over conscience.
5. Sherman suggests education can strengthen the power.
Sherman is a psychologist.
The power is of conscience over authority.
Sherman conducted an experiment.
The experiment proved that reflection and discussion enhance choices.
The reflection is moral.
The discussion is found in the best types of moral education.
The enhancement is substantial.
The choices have ethical quality.
10
B. Write a paragraph on the distinction between conformity and obedience. Select from the suggested
phrases that can help you sound more objective. Hint: Consider a recruit who enters military service.
A distinction must be made, Clearly this is far less true of than ...; This is where the
disagreements and controversies begin ... The data indicates that ...; This is not a view shared by
everyone; X, for example, claims that ...; . . .very few people would claim ... It is worthwhile (at this
stage) to consider ...; Of course, more concrete evidence is needed before ...; Several possibilities
emerge ...; A common solution is ... .
Listen to the following excerpt from Stanley Milgrams The Perils of Obedience and fill in the
C.
missing words from the following sentences.
1. Before starting on the experiments, Milgram asked the opinion of several categories of people such
as (a) , college sophomores, middle class adults, (b) students and faculty in the behavioural
sciences.
2. Most of the (c) were wrong as, during the first experiment, more than (d) obeyed the
orders of the experimenter.
3. One of Milgrams colleagues denied vehemently the findings of the experiments because the
subjects were from Yale and were likely to be more submissive than (e) people.