FT&HX
FT&HX
1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Process Description.............................................................................................. 4
2.1 Assumptions....................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Process Design and Methodology.......................................................................5
3.0 Operational Design.............................................................................................. 13
3.1 Control System Design..................................................................................... 13
3.2 Operating Procedures....................................................................................... 16
3.3 HAZID STUDY (S&T HEAT EXCHANGER)...............................................................18
4.0 Mechanical Engineering Design..........................................................................20
4.1 Mechanical Drawing............................................................................................ 25
Part B......................................................................................................................... 27
1.0 Introduction (Flash Vessel)........................................................................................... 27
1.1 Scope of work................................................................................................... 27
2.0 Process Design.................................................................................................... 27
2.1 Design methodology........................................................................................... 27
2.2 Basic Design Data............................................................................................... 28
2.3 Process design calculation.................................................................................. 28
3.0 Operational Design.............................................................................................. 30
3.2
Operating procedure..................................................................................... 31
Critical Review................................................................................................. 46
Flash Tank.............................................................................................................. 46
Heat Exchanger...................................................................................................... 46
References................................................................................................................ 47
List of Figure
Figure 1 P&ID diagram for shell and tube heat exchanger.........................................................15
Figure 2 Torrispherical head [10]............................................................................... 21
Figure 3 Mechanical design of heat exchanger..........................................................25
Figure 4 Piping and Instrumentation diagram for flash tank........................................................30
Figure 5 Stresses in a cylindrical shell under combined loading [3]..............................................39
Figure 6 Principal stresses on up-wind side [3]......................................................................41
Figure 7 Typical straight skirt support design [3]....................................................................43
Figure 8 Flange ring dimensions [3].................................................................................. 44
Figure 9 Standard bolt size M24 and dimensions [3]................................................................44
Figure 10 Flash tank mechanical design................................................................................ 45
List of Table
Table 1 Stream table for the inlet and out stream of process fluid in HX-102.....................................3
Table 2 Iteration summary of condensing coefficient..................................................................8
Table 3: Iteration process for converging overall heat transfer coefficient.......................................10
Table 4 Design Outcome................................................................................................... 12
Table 5 Component of control system and its function in heat exchanger P&ID (figure 1)..................13
Table 6 Slurry spill accident respond ................................................................................... 16
Table 7 S&T Heat exchanger hazid study..................................................................17
Table 8 Standard skirt dimension........................................................................................ 24
Table 9 Heat exchanger specification sheet .........................................................................25
1.0 Introduction
Heat exchanger is selected as part of the major design with the purpose of heating up the spent liquor
recycled from the precipitation process downstream in the alumina refinery plant. The active caustic soda
content of the spent liquor, which intended to be recycled into digester for bauxite digestion, must be
raised to a temperature higher than that required in bauxite digestion so as to prevent the interruption of
physical and chemical conditions of the attack medium. This is mainly because usual bauxite temperature
being fed into digester is insufficient and the temperature of the attack liquor must be raised from 120 oC to
about 156oC in order to obtain a temperature of 145oC in the liquor for bauxite digestion. Theoretically,
the spent liquor recycled from precipitation process will circulate through a series of heaters and to be
heated up from 80oC to roughly 120oC by heat exchanging with vapor from the flash tank evaporator.
However, the main focus of the design is to achieve the outlet temperature of 110.8 oC as simulated in
SYSCAD at the last heater which feed with vapor from first flash tank in the alumina refinery plant [4].
The process parameter to achieve the design requirement is provided below where the data is extracted
from SYSCAD.
Table 1 Stream table for the inlet and out stream of process fluid in HX-102
Parameter
S021
S041
S040
Vapor fraction
1.00
0.00
0.00
Liquid fraction
0.00
1.00
1.00
Mass flowrate
13.17
13.17
1049.54
(kg/s)
Pressure (kPa)
263.54
263.54
101.33
Temperature (oC)
138.26
129.16
103.26
Heat duty ( kJ/h)
6.27E8
7.32E8
3.77E10
Power (kW)
-174282.07
-203207.80
-10430543.50
S042
0.00
1.00
1049.54
101.33
110.8
1.52E9
-10459469.30
To design an effective heat exchanger with the determination for heat transfer area required from
the given heat duty and temperature difference between hot and cold stream.
Determination of pressure drop at the tube side of the heat exchanger and to achieve the shell side
pressure drop as in SYSCAD model.
Work out operational design which comprises of implementation of control system, operation
procedures and as well as HAZID and HAZOP study.
Work out the dimension required for the heat exchanger and as well as mechanical design.
From the data provided above, the only data that is not reliable is pressure for the process cold stream
(S040 & S042). The SYSCAD model calculated it as atmospheric pressure as in steady state SYSCAD
model, it does not take into consideration of pressure drop calculation neither in pipeline nor in shell side
or tube side heat exchanger pressure drop. However, the inlet pressure for vapor stream is dependable as
SYSCAD able to calculate the flash tank pressure through VLE equilibrium calculation. It is also the
pressure which target to achieve at the shell side of heat exchanger.
2.1 Assumptions
1. Assume the pressure drop calculated by Kerns method at the tube side is reliable and accurate.
2. Ignore the non-condensable air in heat exchanger for ease of calculation. This is because in actual case
air might be dissolve in slurry liquid which pose the issue need to vent non- condensable air in heat
exchanger.
3. Total condensation is used in heat exchanger for the ease of calculation as only condensed liquid is
consider in heat exchanger.
T ) in the
process design.
As the stream 41 liquid fractions is 1.0 as shown in table 1 and purely water, it indicates that the vapor
undergoes condensation in heat exchanger and thus shell and tube condenser design should be considered.
2. Fluid Allocation [2,3]
Series of factors like corrosion, fouling and cleaning considerations have been accounted. Highly
corrosive spent liquor mainly due to its active content of caustic soda is assigned to be placed in the tubes
where the corroded tubes can be replaced easily. Moreover, cost also can be saved on material construction
on the shell side where the body of the shell needs not to be made of corrosive-resistance material. As
process fluid will foul the tube, it is vital to control the process fluid in tube to be in the range of 1-3m/s so
that to reduce scaling and obtain reasonable maintenance frequency. Therefore, spent liquor is to be
allocated in the tube side of heat exchanger. On the other hand, shell side condensation of vapor is
preferable due to the reasons stated before.
Detailed Design Calculation
In the design, horizontal baffled shell and tube condenser is employed as the design is good for single
component vapor, relatively high and low pressure drop design, and liquid coolant. It is to note that in
actual case it is not a coolant as spent liquor is to be heated up. The shell side condensation calculation for
pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient calculation method will be following what have been proposing
for calculation in a typical condenser design which takes into consideration of condensing vapor outside
the tube while single phase flow calculation will be accounted for pressure drop and heat transfer
coefficient calculation in tube for spent liquor.
3. Heat duty (heat transfer rate) [3]
As the primary objective of the design is to work out heat transfer area required and the prerequisite of it is
to determine the heat transfer rate per unit time for vapor stream as equation follows:
Heat transferred from vapor
q=
R=
( T 1T 2) 138.26129.16
=
=1.21
( t 2t 1) 110.8( 103.26 )
S=
( t 2t 1 ) 110.8( 103.26 )
=
=0.22
( T 1t 1) 138.26( 103.26 )
( R +1 ) ln
2
Ft =
( R1 ) ln
( 1S )
( 1RS )
2S [ R+1 ( R 2+1 ) ]
2S [ R+1+ ( R2 +1 ) ]
1.21 0.22
1()
( 10.22 )
( ]
2
( 1.21 +1 ) ln
Ft =
Then the logarithmic mean temperature can be calculated:
T
T
T
( 1t 2)
( 2t 1)
ln
1t
(
2)(T 2t 1)
T lm =
T lm =
( 138.26110.8 )(129.16103.26)
=26.67
( 138.26110.8 )
ln
(129.16103.26)
By first guessing two tube passes for a horizontal heat exchanger, condensation in one shell; true
temperature difference can then be determined through the value calculated above:
T m=F t T lm
T m=0.70 26.67=18.66
Ao=
q
U o ,ass T m
28923.03 103
2
=775.04 m
2000 18.66
xL
Ao
As
775.04
0.51
= 1516.23
N
Db=d o t
K1
( )
1
n1
= 22.225
1516.23
0.249
1
2.207
=1152.50 mm
Where the constant K1 and N1 are determined from table 12.4 in [3], with the configuration of 2 tube
passes and triangular pitch selected.
Number of tube in centre row which is also the row at the shell equator is calculated by:
Nr =
Db
Pt =
1152.50
27.78
= 41.48
Shell side =
T
( 1+T 2)
2
Tube side =
t
( 1+t 2)
2
138.26129.16
=
=133.71
2
(110.8+103.26)
2
= 107.03
= (T T ) x U
MS
MT
o
133.71+98.14
2
= 115.93oC
L = 0.000241 Ns/m2
L = 946.48 kg/m3
v =
PM
2.64 x 18.016
=
RT 8.314 E2 x (133.71+273) = 1.425 kg/m3
k L = 0.68 W/mK
h=
Wc
ln t
13.17
7.32 x 1516.23
= 0.0012 kg/sm
Nrv =
2
3
x Nr =
2
3
2
3
x 41.48 = 27.65
L ( L v ) g
(hc)b = 0.95kL (
= 0.95 x 0.68 (
L h
)1/3
6
N1/
rv
= 11677.47W/m2oC
The calculated condensing coefficient 11677.47 W/m2oC is far apart from the assumed value of 1500
W/m2oC, hence correction to Tw is needed and iteration is required to be carried out.
Table 2 provided the summary of iteration and converged value of condensing coefficient.
Table 2 Iteration summary of condensing coefficient
Parameters
Base case
1st Iteration
Shell side mean
133.71
133.71
o
temperature ( C)
Tube side mean
107.03
107.03
o
temperature ( C)
Tube wall
98.14
129.14
o
temperature, Tw ( C)
Condensate mean
115.92
131.43
o
temperature ( C)
Mean condensing
1500.00
12055.92
coefficient for tube
bundle, (hc)b
(W/m2oC)
2st Iteration
133.71
107.03
129.28
131.50
12055.92
(converged)
D2
4
N
of passes
(19.736)2 x
4
1516.23
2
= 0.23 m2
( SL)(T CSA )
Tube velocity =
mSL
1049.54
1247.28 x 0.23
= 3.63 m/s
Prandtle number which define ratio of momentum diffusivity to thermal diffusivity and Reynolds numbers
that determine type of fluids flow inside the tubes are given by:
Pr =
Cp
k
Re =
v d i
3.66 E x 0.00049
0.1898
= 9.45
= 182248.40
As the calculated Re>2100 and it showed the characteristic of turbulent flow, the heat transfer coefficient
at the tube side can be determined by:
k f 0.8 0.33
d i 0.7
0.1898
19.736 E3 0.7
0.8
0.33
182248.4
9.45
(1+
)
Pr
(1+
)
hi = 0.023 d
=0.023 1 9.736 E3
=
7.34
L
i
7516.06 w/moC
13. Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient [3]
Nickel alloy 400 is selected as the tube material and with a conductivity of, kw of 24. 54 W/m2C and
fouling coefficient of steam condensate and aqueous salt solution are assumed to be 5000W/m2 oC
respectively 0 which is at the maximum of the range of fouling factor coefficient 5000W/m2 oC
respectively so as to maximize the Uo; the overall heat transfer coefficient is calculated by the equation of
1
1
1
U o ho hod
1
1
1
=
+
+
U o 1205592 5000
22.225 ln
d o ln
do
di
2k w
do 1 do 1
d1 hid d i hi
( 22.225
19.736 ) 22.225
+
2 24.54
U o=1404.92
19.736
1
22.225
1
+
W
m .
2
Uo of 2000 W/m2C. Iterations have to be conducted to get the converged U o value. Table below provided
the summary of iterated data with the use of 1404.92 W/m 2oC as the trial coefficient for repeated steps
calculations.
Table 3: Iteration process for converging overall heat transfer coefficient
Parameters
Base Case
1st Iteration
Uo(ass)
2000
1404.92
Area
775.04
1103.32
Tube velocity
3.63
2.55
Bundle diameter
1.15
1.35
Shell side coefficient
12055.92
13562.05
Tube side coefficient
7516.06
5666.16
Overall
heat 1404.92
1369.57
coefficient, Uo
2st Iteration
1369.57
1131.80
1.79
1.37
13677.76
5666.16
1369.57
heat transfer rate and achieve reasonable high pressure drop across the shell of the heat exchanger as
required by SYSCAD. As the design is with total condensation assumption, cross flow design of shell is
vital to be used. It has a partially filled shell with space above the bundle to distribute the vapors along the
entire length. Hence, cross flow area is important to be considered and can be calculated with equation of
As=
( p td o ) D s l B
pt
A s=
G s=
Ws
As
G s=
13.17
kg
=76.13
0.17
s m2
d e=
1.27 2
( P t 0.917 d o2 )
do
d e=
1.27
( 27.7820.917 22.2252 )=15.78 mm
22.225
With vapour viscosity of 0.0000135 Ns/m2 at mean vapor temperature (133.71oC), the shell side
Reynolds number can then be calculated:
Gsde
(76.13 15.78 E )
=
=88992.67
0.0000135
From the Figure 12.30 in [3] with Reynoldss number of 8.9 10
to be 0.029, then the linear velocity can be determined by:
jf
is obtain
us =
Gs
v
us =
76.13
=53.24 m/ s
1.43
Ps =8 j f
2
L v u s
lB 2
w
Ds
de
0.14
( )( ) ( )
Ps =8 ( 0.029 )
525.35
19.75
)(
7.34
602.73
1000
)(
1.43 53.24
=518.93 kPa
2
As pressure drop on the condensing side is difficult to be predicted due to the existence of two phases
and vapor mass velocity is varying throughout the condenser. For total condensation, Kerns suggested
a factor of 50% of calculated pressure drop using inlet flow where it takes into account for the change
in vapor velocity using method of single phase flow.
107.3
is
calculated:
ut di
Friction factor,
jf
[ ( )( ) ]
L
Pt =N p 8 j f
di
Pt =2 8 ( 0.0028 )
u t
+2.5
2
7.34
1247.28 1.82
+2.5
=43.61 kPa
19.736
2
22.225
19.735
7.34
2.56
26.66
27.78
1435.07
602.73
42
1370.56
43.61
259.46
Comment: The overall design is satisfactory. This is because of reasonable tube side velocity which falls
in the range of 1-3m/s. Shell side average vapor velocity is 26.66m/s, which is reasonable as the shell side
vapor velocity fall in the range of 10 -30 m/s. The 26.6m/s is actually taking the mean velocity at inlet
vapor stream which is 56.24m/s and velocity at outlet condensate stream 0.08m/s The pressure drop in
shell is nearest to the value of 263.54kPa as shown in SYSCAD. The obtained shell side pressure is
particularly designed to be lower than the pressure stated in SYSCAD to ensure the vapor flow from high
pressure flash tank to low pressure without reverse flow. The pressure drop in tube side is also make sense
as usually in series of heat exchanger the HX-105 will have the highest tube side pressure drop (300kPa
from HATCH) and pump need to ensure the spent liquid have enough energy to flow towards all the 5 heat
exchangers. The pressure should be of from high to low. And the tube side pressure drop is valid with
43.61kpa < than 300 kPa.
Function
To isolate V-65 for maintenance purposes
To bypass and act as a backup valve
To prevent reverse flow of water
Function
To isolate V-01 for maintenance purposes
To bypass and act as a backup valve
To prevent reverse flow of liquor
To stop/ block the fluid flow into heat exchanger or
flowing out
To drain spent liquor for maintenance purposes
Function
To stop/ block the fluid from flowing into heat
exchanger or flowing out
To bypass and act as a backup valve
To isolate V-72 for maintenance purposes
To prevent reverse flow of spent liquor
To drain spent liquor for maintenance purposes
Control System
Components
Temperature indicator controller
TIC
Temperature indicator transmitter
TIT
Pressure indicator controller PIC
Pressure indicator transmitter PIT
High pressure alarm H
Low pressure alarm L
Function
Receive signal from TIT which first compare the
variation of set point and perform action on PIC
Detect temperature variation from set point and send
signal to TIC
Perform action on control valve to adjust the pressure
of vapor
Detect variation of pressure from set point and
transmit signal to PIC
To notify when pressure is high
To notify when pressure is low
It is also vital for users to check that the equipment is fully depressurized, vented, drained, neutralized or
drained before disassemble the heat exchanger.
Keep all the log books that record down the event or operation malfunction which affect the heat
exchanger performance. This is to ensure no repeatable mistake in operation in the future.
up to 300cc
Medium
300 cc - 5 liters
Response
Absorption or chemical
treatment
Treatment Materials
Caustic neutralizer
or absorption material
like sand or socks
Absorption materials
Absorption
Public safety must be
Large
more than 5 liters
outside help
called
1.1. Determine the size of spill/ leakage and take appropriate action according to the table proposed
below.
1.2. Contain and clean up the leaks with the chemical used.
Emergency shutdown procedure [9]
For safety control, pressure relief valve and emergency shutdown valve are being installed into the
equipment. If pressure in the heat exchanger went abnormal, the set pressure in the pressure relief valve
will be activated and hence relieving the emergency situation. However, if PRV malfunction, emergency
shutdown valve will be activated when it detects 20% extra high temperature in the stream and alarm will
ring and fluid flow will be shut down immediately.
HAZARD
ID
HAZARD CATEGORY
(GUIDEWORD)
Natural Disasters
HAZARD
DESCRIPTION /
HAZARDOUS
EVENT
Extreme heat
CONSEQUENCES
Pressure build up in
HX-102
Heat stress of
personnel
PREVENTION /
DETECTION / BARRIES
RISK ASSESSMENT
LIKELIHOOD CONSEQUENCE
SEVERITY
Possible
Low
RECOMMENDATIONS
RANKING
Low
Pipeline an equipment
thermal expansion
HX-102 operate
higher than operating
temperature of 80C
2
External Effects
Dropped objects
Damage of HX-102
Possible rupture of
HX-102, thus release
of corrosive caustic
Unlikely
Critical
Extreme
External Effects
Fatigue/ cracking
Rupture of pipeline
N/A
Unlikely
Major
High
Loss of containment
Cracking of HX-102
shell
Human Factors
Improper/
inadequate training
Loss of alumina
production
Loss of production
Process upset and
abnormal operating
condition
N/A
Possible
Critical
ACTIONS
Extreme
Operators to do
temperature
monitoring
Electrical
engineering team
to install alarms
Operators to
inspect the
equipment and
pipeline
condition.
Offshore health
and safety
executive to
handle all the
safety requirement
rule and
regulations.
Maintenance
engineering team
to perform the
testing and fix
broken pipeline or
equipment
leakage.
Designers/
consultants to
provide the
training.
Operators to obey
Damage to equipment
which might include
HX-102
Equipment/Instrumentation
Malfunction
Explosion
No heat exchange
(fail to open)
N/A
Unlikely
Major
High
HX-102 over
pressurized (fail to
close)
Process Upsets
Process Upsets
Flow deviation
Pressure deviation
Loss of containment
(fail to close)
Increase in
temperature in HX102
Insufficient
temperature to digest
bauxite ore
HX-102 over
pressurized and
rupture
Process
engineering team
to design and
maintenance team
to install bypass
and isolation
valves
N/A
Relief valve
Likely
Moderate
High
Process
engineering team
to design and
electrician to
install the control
system
Possible
Critical
Extreme
Installation of emergency
shutdown valve and high
temperature alarm.
Electrical
engineering team
to install
emergency
shutdown valve
connected to high
temperature alarm
and display at the
indicator
Likely
Major
Extreme
Operators to
perform the
checking
periodically.
Loss of containment
Vent line V-16
Upsets to downstream
equipment
Process Upsets
Corrosion/ erosion
Personal injury or
death
Cracking and leakage
of HX-102 and as well
as inlet and outlet
pipelines S021, S040,
S041, S042
Cracking of vessel or
pipeline
9
Utilities Failures
Loss of power
Loss of functionality
of cascade control
systems
Pressure build up in
HX-102
Unlikely
Moderate
Moderate
Maintenance
engineering team
to perform the
testing.
Electrical
engineering team
to install backup
generator
Loss of alumina
production
Pressure vessel arrangement and type of domed head and end closure.
Wall thickness required for cylindrical vessel, shell cover, channel covers and tubesheet thickness
Dead weight of vessel
Elastic stability check
Flanges
Nozzles
Gaskets
Stress calculations
Saddle support
t s=
p Ds
+ c = 3.71mm
fj0.6 p
The joint efficiency is taken as 0.85 with spot radiography and double welded butt joint. The low joint
factor will give reasonably low cost and as well as compromise with thicker and heavier the vessel it will
result.
The minimum thickness for the cylindrical shell before the corrosion allowance is 3.41mm and the
resulting thickness after the corrosion allowance is 3.71mm.
Arrangement of pressure vessel and type of domed head and end closure [12]
As determined from the chart in .the design of heater is favorable of horizontal oriented pressure
vessels. Torispherical head is chosen due to its common usage in chemical industries and suitable for high
operating pressure which up to 200 psi.
P Ri W
2 fJ0.2 P
+c
= 3.54mm
1
4
W=
(3 +
Ri
ri
= 1.54
The channel cover thickness is calculated from the formula of
t cc =
D C C 1 P
10 f
= 4.71mm
Vessel Dead Weight Load [12]
With carbon steel cylindrical vessel and doomed ends, the estimated vessel weight is
WV = 240CVDm(HV+0.8Dm)t
=11.74kN
Weight of tube plates:
( Di )2= 1.62 m2
4
Plate area =
t ts =
FG p P
3
kf
= 14.17mm
Where F is taken as 1 for floating type tube sheet and mean ligament efficiency k is computed by
k=1
0.907
2
PT
( )
do
=0.43
Impingement plates requirement [12]
It is usually installed on the tube side of a bundle which serves to slow down and disperse the fluid as it
enters the exchanger. It helps in prolongs the lifespan of the tubes and as well as the bundle.
The requirement for the installation of impingement plate is given by:
<125
Where
= 4041.19
The calculated value is 4041.19, which is greater than 125. Impingement plate is required and the
thickness will be 6mm according to usual standard.
Nozzles size [12]
From [12], with shell ID > than 1 m it is recommended to have nozzle ID of 0.254 m
Gaskets [12]
Gasket is designed in the way to make the metal to metal surfaces leak proof. The deformation of gaskets
under load seals the surface irregularities between metal to metal surfaces which prevents leakage of the
fluid.
To prevent the leakage of the internal fluid, the residual gasket force must be larger than calculated force
or required. The equation is presented below for the scenario mentioned:
DOG
D IG
Y pm
Y p (m+ 1)
= 1.0065
Where DIG = Ds + 0.25
The gasket factor m is taken as 3 for corrugated metal with asbestos fill from the table of stated in [12]
due to its ability to withstand in high temperature whereas Y is stated to be 3.87 for maximum design
seating stress with the reference of gasket factor. From the calculated value of
DOG
= 1.0065 and
D IG
DIG of 1.432m the gasket width can then be determined with formula of
Gasket width, N =
( D OGD IG )
2
= 4.66mm
Take 10 mm as the design for standard width
Bolt design [12]
The minimum initial bolt load at atmospheric pressure and temperature is given by
Wm1 =
bGY =192043.3 N
The gasket is compressed under tight pressure and the required bolt load W m2 is given by
2
G p = 79590.09N
4
Wm2 = H + Hp = 2 bGmp +
( D OG + D IG )
2
N
2
= 1.44m
Wm 1
fa
= 21290.19 mm2
M16 nominal thread diameter with bolt circle diameter (C b) of 1470mm, 56 bolts and 22mm Dbr
Are selected from https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S08/is.4864-4870.1968.pdf
Minimum gasket width, Nmin =
Ab f b
2 YG
= 1.00693
Flange [12]
For gasket seating condition (no internal load applied)
( A m + A b) f a
2
W=
Mf =
= 358786.24N
W (CbG)
2
= 5384521 Nmm
(CbB)
2
= 17.465 mm
B
4
= 77601.68N
(CbG)
2
= 15.0076 mm
(( hD + hG ))/2 = 16.24mm
Mf
Tf =
K=
A
B
M of Y
f faB
= 55.14mm
from graph; A is 1515 from chosen bolt while B= diameter of shell; hence K = 1.06mm
; Y = 1.06
Dimensions (m)
m
1.2
kN
180
V
0.78
Y
0.20
C
1.09
J
0.36
E
0.45
G
0.14
mm
t2
t1
Bolt dia.
Bolt holes.
12
10
34
30
Although original design case is 1.45m, it is assumed that the support dimension can support the overall
weight as extra details design is needed due to the reason that the data given by handbook is just limited
to 12m. Moreover, the calculated weight is approximately 14 kN which is far way enough to support from
the dimension above. The dimension data extracted from handbook is assumed to be applicable to heat
exchanger design as more complex calculation is needed in order to work out the accurate data.
Figure 3 Mechanical
design of heat exchanger
HE-101 Heat
Exchanger
Specification
Sheet
Equipment No.
Functional Description
Type of Heat Exchanger
Orientation
Operation
Shell Side Fluid
Tube Side Fluid
Total Heat Duty
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
Heat Transfer Area
Fluid
Mass Flow Rate
Composition
Temperature
Pressure (as in SYSCAD)
Density
Heat Capacity
Thermal Conductivity
Viscosity
Shell Inner Diameter
No. of Passes
No. of Baffles
Bundled Diameter
Total No. of Tubes
No. of Tubes per Pass
Tube Outer Diameter
Tube Inner Diameter
Tube Length
Pitch Diameter
Pressure Drop
Material of Construction
Prepared by
Checked by
HX-102
Sheet No.
1
General Data
To transfer heat from vapor in order to heat up spent liquor
Shell and tube, floating head type
Horizontal
Continuous
Vapor
Spent liquor
Operating Data
28923.03 kW
1369.57 W/m2C
1131.80 m2
Performance of one Unit
Shell Side
Tube Side
Vapor
Spent liquor
13.17
1049.54
kg/s
H2O (v)
1.00 H2O
0.8886
Total NaOH
0.0691 Mol fraction
Other Comp.
0.0423
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
138.26
129.16
103.26
110.80 degC
263.54
101.325
kPa
1.43
1247.28
kg/m3
2.17
3.65
kJ/kg.degC
0.68
0.1898
W/m.degC
0.0000135
0.00049
kg/ms
Construction of one Shell
1435.07 mm
2 (Type F, TEMA Standards)
3
1.37 m
2206
2
22.225 mm
19.736 mm
7.34 mm
27.78 mm
(Triangular Pitch Arrangement)
Shell Side
Tube Side
259.46
43.61
kPa
Carbon Steel
Nickel alloy 400
Kelvin Tan Khai Yik
Vincent Tan Kok Yew
Date: 7/11/2014
Date: 7/11/2014
Table 9 Heat exchanger specification sheet (Critical review of heat exchanger is provided at
part B of the report in section 5.0 which is combined together with flash tank due to space limit)
Part B
1.0 Introduction (Flash Vessel)
In alumina refinery plant, flash train vessels are commonly used equipments in digestion facility which
aims to let down the pressure of the digester discharge slurry stream (S-019) into atmospheric pressure by
mean to flash cool the slurry and to make the slurry concentrated. The high pressure slurry enters the low
pressure flash tank FT-101 leads to the formation of liquid slurry and steam. In the flashing process,
slurry will be cooled down through the evaporation of steam while the heat from the steam will be used in
HX-102 for heating up the spent liquor. The flash tank design in the report is aimed to work out the
required dimension of vessel in term of height and diameter to handle the amount of slurry feed to the
vessel, position of the slurry entry nozzle, vapor outlet nozzle and as well as vessel arrangement.
However, the constraint for the design is to ensure minimum slurry carry over with the outgoing vapor,
sufficient hydraulic head for the transportation of fluid from tank to tank which need to compromise with
the costing of elevation construction and wind loading. Sufficient hydraulic head to transport the slurry
from tank to tank through the interconnecting flash piping is not enough as the pressure drop in pipeline
might induce multiphase flow which will lead to erosion and pipeline wear [5].
S019
1212.15
303.90
1212.5
145
0
0.96
0.04
3.76E10
-10439463.86
S020
1198.98
263.54
1277.78
138.26
0
0.96
0.04
3.7E10
-10265181.79
S021
13.17
263.54
1.42
138.26
1
0
0
6.3E8
-174282.07
Comment: The percentage of slurry flashes to vapor is 1.09% with the output of 13.17 kg/s of vapor at
S021. Moreover, it can be seen from the stream table that the temperature of S019 is being reduced by
4.64% due to the thermal energy release with the vaporization of vapor. Thus, the process sizing of flash
vessel have to take into the considerations that the objective of at least 4.64% temperature reduction, flow
rate of slurry and vapor at the outlet and inlet can be achieved with the dimension and operating condition
of flash tank designed.
L V
V
1277.781.42
1.42
= 898.85
For vapor to flash without carrying over the liquid droplet, it is vital to calculate terminal velocity of
vapor. The terminal velocity is the force balance on the liquid droplet and when the scenario of net gravity
force balance the drag force happens, the heavier liquid will settle at constant terminal velocity. Thus, it is
important to ensure that velocity of vapor is less than the terminal velocity to minimize the carryover of
liquid by vapor and for the ease of heavier liquid settle out at the bottom of tank. The equation for
terminal velocity is calculated by:
Terminal velocity
Ut =
Wa
2
D
v
4
= 0.7
Condensate quality factor is to determine the purity of vapor flashed at the vapor outlet. It is vital to
ensure that the vapor does not contaminate with slurry droplet as liquid carry over by vapor will reduce
the heat exchanger performance at downstream and damage the equipment at shell side (prone to corrode
due to alkaline medium). The equation is determine by:
Condensate Quality Factor
k=
u
B
0.7
898.85 = 0.023
The equation below presented the conductivity of caustic in the flash vessel. It is a vapor purity parameter
to consider as high caustic content (characterize b high conductivity) will pose high chances in
contaminating the vapor stream. The caustic concentration is obtained by SYSCAD with the value of 170
kg/m3.
Target Conductivity
Ck
a
45 x 170 x 0.023
1.42
= 147.65
s/cm
The calculated 147.65 target conductivity is reasonable and showing the calculation is on the right track.
This is because HATCH suggested the target conductivity value of < 200 s/cm .
Diameter
With the determination of target conductivity and caustic concentration in flash tank, mass flow rate of
vapor, the diameter of the flash vessel is then calculated by equation as follows:
D=
4
c
1
Wa
a L a
4
45 x 170
1
13.17
Height
The determined diameter 4.14m is then substitute into equation below to determine the total height of
flash tank.
H
D
V vap
= 2.5
= 0.2x 7.25
=1.45m
Ensure the flash vessel is totally empty and free of any foreign objects.
Flush the unwanted material in the vessel using slurry and drain the wastes via drain valve if the
vessel is not empty
Ensure the vessel is connected to all the utilities and check for any possible loosen pipe connection
to the vessel to prevent leakage of slurry.
Ensure the temperature, pressure and level sensors attached to the vessel functioning properly.
Run the utilities and ensure the operating condition like pressure and slurry pool level in vessel is
achieved through the control system
Monitor the flash vessel for about 30 minutes to check for any unusual activities.
If everything is under good operating condition, feed the slurry into the flash column; otherwise
check for any issue that limit the desired operating condition from being achieving.
Shut down
1If the operation is to be shut down, it is recommended to close the feed valve to stop feeding the vessel.
2Turn off all the operating switches.
3Drain off the slurry from the flash vessel and vent off the possible vapor build in the vessel.
4Ensure the vessel is totally empty.
5Slowly depressurizing the vessel to atmospheric pressure by turning on the relief valve.
6Shut down all utilities connection.
7Allows the vessel to be cooled down to room temperature.
8Check for any possible equipment damage or leakages.
9Inform the maintenance team for any possible damage to the equipment.
Operating procedure
1. Control the flow meter so that 1212.15 kg/s is achieved in the feed stream.
2. Ensure the slurry level in flash tank is always maintained at the required level and as well the pressure
in vessel is constant at 263.54 kPa.
3. Ensure the slurry inlet temperature to flash tank is of 145 oC to ensure optimum flashing of vapor
under desired operating pressure in flash tank as temperature will change the VLE equilibrium of
flash pressure.
4. Carry out close monitoring to the flash vessel operating condition and check for any unusual activity.
5. Perform emergency shutdown procedure if serious problem arise to the operating vessel and hard to
solve it.
Emergency shut down
In an event of emergency shutdown, recognized the vessel alarms and acted upon.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Take immediate action if excessive temperature, pressure or low liquid level is observed.
Stop the feeding of slurry into the vessel.
Open the drain and vent valves to release the caustic liquid and as well as depressurizing.
No entry or work should be done on the flash vessel before the vessel is free of slurry and
depressurized.
HAZARD CATEGORY
(GUIDEWORD)
Natural Disasters
HAZARD
DESCRIPTION /
HAZARDOUS
EVENT
Extreme heat
CONSEQUENCES
Pressure build up in
FT-101
Heat stress of
personnel
PREVENTION /
DETECTION / BARRIES
RISK ASSESSMENT
LIKELIHOOD CONSEQUENCE
SEVERITY
Possible
Low
External Effects
Dropped objects
Possible rupture of
FT-101, thus release
of corrosive caustic
Low
External Effects
Fatigue/ cracking
Rupture of pipeline
Unlikely
Critical
Extreme
N/A
Unlikely
Major
High
Cracking of FT-101
shell
Human Factors
Improper/
inadequate training
Operators to do
temperature
monitoring
Electrical
engineering team
to install alarms
Loss of containment
Loss of alumina
production
Loss of production
Operators to
inspect the
equipment and
pipeline condition.
ACTIONS
RANKING
Pipeline an equipment
thermal expansion
FT-101 operate
higher than operating
temperature of
138.26C
Damage of FT-101
RECOMMENDATIONS
N/A
Possible
Critical
Extreme
Offshore health
and safety
executive to
handle all the
safety requirement
rule and
regulations.
Maintenance
engineering team
to perform the
testing and fix
broken pipeline or
equipment
leakage.
Designers/
consultants to
provide the
training.
Operators to obey
Damage to equipment
which might include
FT-101
Equipment/Instrumentation
Malfunction
Explosion
No heat exchange
(fail to open)
N/A
Unlikely
Major
High
FT-101 over
pressurized (fail to
close)
Process Upsets
Process Upsets
Flow deviation
Pressure deviation
Loss of containment
(fail to close)
Increase in
temperature in FT-101
Insufficient
temperature to digest
bauxite ore
FT-101 over
pressurized and
rupture
Process
engineering team
to design and
maintenance team
to install bypass
and isolation
valves
N/A
Likely
Moderate
High
Possible
Critical
Extreme
Installation of emergency
shutdown valve and high
temperature alarm.
Likely
Major
Extreme
Loss of containment
Upsets to downstream
equipment
Process Upsets
Corrosion/ erosion
Personal injury or
death
Cracking and leakage
of FT-101 and as well
as inlet and outlet
pipelines S019, S020,
S021.
Cracking of vessel or
pipeline
9
Utilities Failures
Loss of power
Loss of functionality
of cascade control
systems
Pressure build up in
FT-101
Loss of alumina
Unlikely
Moderate
Moderate
Process
engineering team
to design and
electrician to
install the control
system
Electrical
engineering team
to install
emergency
shutdown valve
connected to high
temperature alarm
and display at the
indicator
Operators to
perform the
checking
periodically.
Maintenance
engineering team
to perform the
testing.
Electrical
engineering team
to install backup
generator
production
HAZOP
Project: Alumina refiney
P&ID No.: 0001
Node Description: Flash Tank FT-101
Date:
27/4
Node No.: FT-101
No.
Parameter
Guideword
Consequence
Safeguard
(Existing)
Recommendations
1.
Level
No
2.
Level
Less
Same as 1.
Same as 1.
3.
Level
More
Same as 1.
Liquid outlet bypass valves
V-11 through I-1.
Same as 1.
Action
-Electrical
Engineering to install
alarms
-Process engineering
to install bypass valve
-Operator to perform
regular inspection
-Maintenance team to
repair the broken
equipment.
Same as 1.
Same as 1.
slurry (1,2)
4.
Pressure
Less
Level control
Pressure controller
5.
Pressure
More
1.
2.
3.
4.
Same as 4.
6.
Flow
No
7.
Flow
Less
8.
Flow
More
9.
Temperature
Less
No production (1,2,3)
Build of liquid in FT-101 (2)
Pressure build up in FT-101 (3)
Inefficient separation
Condensation of vapour
Same as 1
Same as 4
Same as 1
Same as 1.
Same as 1.
Same as 1.
Same as 1.
High level alarm to notify (2).
High pressure alarm to notify.
Same as 1
Installation of temperature
control system TI-01
Same as 1
10.
Temperature
11.
Maintenance
More
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Inefficient separation
Condensation of vapour
Same as 1
Same as 1
pD
( 2 fj p ) cos
0.2899 x 4110
( 2 x 240 x 10.2899 ) cos 60
= 5 mm
Due to time constraint, the design stress for nickel alloy 400 is assumed to be the same as low alloy
steel. With design angle of 60oC as suggested by HATCH, and 10% extra above calculated
temperature and pressure for safety design purposes, the designed temperature and pressure is as
follows:
Design temperature = 138.26 x 1.1 = 152.09oC
Design pressure = 263.54 x 1.1 = 289.89kPa = 289.89 x 0.001 = 0.2899 N/mm2
The design stress with reference to temperature from table 13.2 = 240 N/mm 2
The calculated wall thickness for conical bottom is 5mm and with corrosion allowance, 5mm
+ 4mm = 9mm
Cylindrical shell
Pi D i
( 0.2899 ) (4110 )
Minimum wall thickness, e= 2 f Pi = 2(240)0.2899 =2.48 mm
Add corrosion allowance 2.48 mm + 4 mm 6.48 mm plate
Dead weight of vessel [3]
For cylindrical steel vessel with domed ends, uniform wall thickness,(Sinnott 2001)
WV=240CVDm(HV+0.8Dm)t
=240(1.08)(4.110+9x10-3)[7.19+0.8(4.11+9x10-3)](9)
=72523.51N 72.52 kN
where:
CV=1.08 with vessels with only few internal fittings
Dm=mean diameter of vessel (Di+t)
HV=length of cylindrical section
t=wall thickness,mm
Assume the ladder length is 7.19m for maintenance purposes,
For plain steel ladder, 150N/m x 7.19m = 1078.5N 1.08 kN
Total weight = 1.08 + 72.52 = 73.6kN
Analysis of stresses [3]
Figure 5
.
At bottom tangent line
P Di ( 0.2899 ) (4110)
=
=
=91.88 N /m m2
h
Pressure stresses: Longitudinal stresses,
2t
2( 6.48)
P Di ( 0.2899 ) (4110)
=45.86 N /mm2
Circumferential stresses, L = 4 t =
4 (6.48)
W =
WV
( D i +t ) t
73.6 x 10
=0.878 N / m m2 (compressive)
(
)
4110+6.48 6.48
Bending stresses:
D0=4110+2x6.48=4122.96mm
Second moment of area of the vessel about the plane of bending,
IV =
4
4
4
4
11
4
Do Di )= ( 4122.96 4110 )=1.78 x 10 m m
(
64
64
F x ( 2458 )( 6.48 )
M x= W =
=51606.20 Nm
2
2
where:
Dynamic wind pressure = 1280N/m2 (Sinnott 2001)
Mean diameter = 4.11+2(6.48)x10-3=4.12m
Mx Di
51606200 4110
=
+t =
+ 6.48 = 0.22 N /m m2
b
11
Bending stress,
IV 2
2
1.78 x 10
( )
47.04
91.8
C =2 104
t
6.48
=2 104
=31.43 N /m m2
Do
4122.97
( )
The maximum compressive stress will occur when the vessel is not under pressure,
2
= W + b=0.878+ 0.22=1.098 N /m m
As the calculated value is below critical buckling stress, the design is satisfactory.
Skirt support [3]
Skirt support is to be designed in the way that it is able to support the maximum dead weight
load of the vessel when it is completely filled with water.
For a straight cylindrical skirt,
s =90
Approximate weight = ( 4
x D2 x L)
g=
5.28
=111.48kNm
Bending moment at base of skirt, Ms= Fw x (
)
2
2
As first trial, skirt thickness is to be taken the same as bottom section of vessel = 6.48mm
4 Ms
4 ( 111.48 x 103 ) x 10 3
2
Bending stress in the skirt, bs= ( D +t ) t D = ( 4110+ 6.48 ) 4110 6.48 =1.29 N /mm
s
s s
s
ws ( operating )=
ws (test )=
W
1007.52 x 103
=
=12.02 N /mm 2
( Ds +t s )t s ( 4110+6.48 ) 6.48
72.52 x 103
=0.865 N /mm2
( 4110+ 6.48 ) 6.48
2
^
Maximum s ( compressive )= bs + ws =1.29+12.02=13.31 N /m m
2
^
Maximum s ( tensile ) = bs ws =1.290.865=0.425 N /mm
( )
13.31
0.125 ( 185469.04 )
6.48
( 4110
) sin 90
13.31 225
where:
f s ( design stress )
E(Youngs modulus at ambient temperature, N/mm2)
Since both constraints are satisfied, and add 4 mm for corrosion the design skirt thickness (ts)
is 6.48+4 = 10.48 mm
Both criteria are satisfied, add 2mm for corrosion, and give a design skirt thickness (ts) of
12mm.
2100
=10.9
600
93.22 mm2
Bolt root diameter=
Ab 4
93.22 x 4
=
=10.89 mm Small as it < 25mm
][
Fb
1 10749.61
The minimum width of the base ring, Lb= f c 103 = 5 103 =2.15 mm (size is small)
As the calculated root diameter and minimum width of base ring is too small, the smallest bolt
size is chosen.
Use M24 bolts (BS 4190:1967) root area=353mm2
Actual width required=Lr+ts+50mm
=76+6.48+50
=132.48 mm
50mm is the allowance space.
Actual bearing pressure on concrete foundation:
f c = F b = 10749.61 =0.077 N /m m2
3
3
139 10 139 10
Base ring minimum thickness, t b=Lr
3 f c
3(0.077)
=76
=3.09 mm
fr
140
where:
fr = allowable design stress in the ring material, and the basic design stress is 140N/mm2
Figure 8
Figure 8.
Figure 9 Standard bolt size M24 and dimensions [3]
Heat Exchanger
The design heat exchanger is of one shell two tube passes. The shell side of the heat exchanger is of
condenser configuration where the formula involves for the calculation of heat transfer coefficient and
pressure drop are with the consideration of multiphase flow (condensing vapor) happening at the outer
tube of shell. However, the design equation proposed is not accurate as Kern method is employed.
There are other method like Bell method and Delaware method which can be used for the sizing of
heat exchanger as they provide more accurate pressure drop and with the consideration of baffle to
shell and tube to baffle leakages and as well as bypassing. The proposed design also without
consideration of venting non condensable air as in actual case there are non-condensable air exists in
heat exchanger that reduce the performance of overall heater. If I had to design it again, I would take
that into consideration and use sophisticated software to predict the performance of heat exchanger.
References
[1] Experiment 14. 2014. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER. Accessed November 10.
http://www6.kfupm.edu.sa/heattransfer/Expt_14_Shell%20and%20Tube%20HX%20Exp.pdf
[2] Kenmneth J. Bell. 1996. Thermal and hydraulic design of heat exchangers. Begell house: New York.
[3] Sinnot, R. K. 2005. Coulson & Richardsons chemical engineering volume 6. 4th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
[4] Droy, Bernard and Dany Michaux. 2012. Bauxite ore digestion in the bayer process. Accessed November 11,
http://www.google.com/patents/US6555076
[5] Lowy, Gunnewiek and Umesh Shah. 2008. Flash Vessel Process Design. International Conference CFD in Oil & Gas, Metallurgical and Process Industries.
[6] KLM Technology Group.2011. START-UP SEQUENCE AND GENERAL COMMISSIONING PROCEDURES.
http://www.klmtechgroup.com/PDF/ess/PROJECT_STANDARDS_AND_SPECIFICATIONS_general_commissioning_procedures_Rev01.pdf
[7] Engineer Edge. 2000. Hydrostatic engineering review.
http://www.engineersedge.com/testing_analysis/hydrostatic_testing.htm
[8] Environmental Health and Safety. 2014. Chemical Spills Procedure. Accessed November 12
http://web.princeton.edu/sites/ehs/emergency/spills.htm
[9] Kuppan Thulukkanam. 2013. Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, Second Edition. CRC Press: United State.
http://books.google.com.au/books?
id=ZsU5A1mANWUC&pg=PA1169&lpg=PA1169&dq=operating+procedure+for+heat+exchanger+start+up+and+shut+down+and+maintenance&source=bl
&ots=sa4DzDG-y8&sig=SH-eqbnSp17o2ZVYEh83Ozae3WM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=k_FdVObBH-TAmQXT74CQDw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=operating
%20procedure%20for%20heat%20exchanger%20start%20up%20and%20shut%20down%20and%20maintenance&f=false
[10] Types of vessel head. 2013. Mycheme. Accessed November 11.
http://www.mycheme.com/types-of-vessel-head/
[11] Liptak, B. G. 2005. Heat Exchanger Control and Optimization.
http://books.google.com.au/books?
id=TxKynbyaIAMC&pg=PA2004&lpg=PA2004&dq=the+transfer+of+heat+is+one+of+the+most+basic+and+best+understood+unit+operation+of+the+proce
ssing+industries.
+Heat+can+betransferred+between+the+same+phases&source=bl&ots=jxqhQPdxDP&sig=7t4w5QQADVWp9T9XLmVdanl4_0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=V0xkVL
qbBOXlmAWgqIDQAg&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=the%20transfer%20of%20heat%20is%20one%20of%20the%20most%20basic%20and
%20best%20understood%20unit%20operation%20of%20the%20processing%20industries.%20Heat%20can%20betransferred%20between%20the%20same
%20phases&f=false
[12] Module 2. 2014. Mechanical Design Standards. Accessed November 11. http://nptel.ac.in/courses/103103027/
[13] The Engineering Toolbox. 2014. Young Modulus of Elasticity for Metals and Alloys. Accessed November 11,
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/young-modulus-d_773.html