Balancing Risk and Reward: Ed Padon
Balancing Risk and Reward: Ed Padon
Ed Padon:
Balancing risk and reward
After selling options for more than a decade, this fund manager knows how to generate consistent
gains while avoiding drawdowns.
BY DAVID BUKEY
to go.
options on those contracts. He traded fied program also sells puts and calls
without charts for six months before on other futures contracts and takes
changing brokers and discovering slightly more risk.
technical analysis. Unlike many options fund man-
“I tried all the indicators — Relative Strength Index, sto- agers who sell strangles (short puts + short calls) on the S&P
chastics, moving average convergence-divergence,” he 500, Padon’s approach is not market-neutral. Instead, he
OT: When you say risk, are you talking about the statistical mium. For example, I can’t even start to sell strikes at a 1-
risk of a put’s strike price going into the money — the mar- percent risk in bond futures. You might get 1/64th of pre-
ket dropping to the strike by expiration? mium, if that.
EP: Right.
OT: So what’s the answer?
OT: How do you find put strikes that have just a 1-percent EP: I don’t trade those contracts. You might trade them
risk of loss? directionally. Or to sell options, you’d have to take three or
EP: I have custom formulas that use the S&P 500’s current four times the risk. Right now, the T-bond’s implied volatil-
implied and historical volatilities. The first formula uses the ity is just over 5 percent and the S&P 500’s implied volatili-
S&P 500’s historical volatility and shows the worst-case sce- ty is 9 percent, which is historically low. That’s why we’re
nario (how far the market might fall). The second formula uses having trouble selling the put strikes I want to.
implied volatility to show what the marketplace is imply-
ing. OT: How has the drop in the VIX index affected your per-
To find a strike to sell, I assume the current month prob- formance? Has it made your job harder?
ably won’t be the worst (the largest loss) we’ve ever seen. EP: Yes. Because of the low volatility, we’re not selling
And the implied volatility is probably wrong. Otherwise, options for more than $1. When you’re selling options for
there would be no option premium. less than $1, there’s a lot less flexibility between the bid and
The implied volatility [suggests] selling a higher strike ask prices. If an option costs between $1 and $3, you don’t
than the historical volatility, because historical volatility mind giving up $0.10 or $0.15 to execute the trade. But with
shows the worst-case scenario. I sell the strike in between $0.50 to $0.80 options, every nickel makes a big percentage
the statistical and implied volatilities. difference in your returns.
When the market starts falling, EP: Only one of 15 orders I send gets filled. The lower the
volatility, the worse it is. And I’m not seeing the strength of
the bid as I had in the past. Previously, market makers
and traders become fearful, some would quote 0.40 (bid), 0.60 (ask), and you could bank on
some $0.40 options there to sell. But now you might sell 100
of the prices that result surprise me. contracts before the bid drops to $0.30.
With low volatility, no one who fears the downside is
buying options, and the quantity [of puts dries up].
OT: Is your formula for determining strike prices a probabil- OT: Would you consider changing your strategy to adapt?
ity calculator where you enter the S&P’s price, its expected EP: I don’t know what changes I can make other than lim-
future volatility, and time until expiration, and you’ll find a iting the capital we manage. You can try to sell more con-
probability of the index ever touching that strike within a cer- tracts at a lower price, but I don’t see the advantage. I’d
tain time period? rather start trading S&P 500 index-based options at the
EP: No, but it’s similar — the same basic situation. CBOE. If the margins were the same at the CBOE as at the
CME — dollar for dollar — I’d trade on both exchanges. I’d
OT: So you think the S&P 500’s most probable move is rather try to get more liquidity from another exchange than
somewhere between what its historical and implied volatili- reduce the price of the puts we sell.
ties suggest? I’ve heard the CBOE is considering lowering their mar-
EP: Well, it maximizes your return for the risk taken. gins in the fourth quarter. I don’t think our programs could
Obviously, you could go out to the worst-case scenario (sell- hold more than $100 million at the CME. So it’d be good if
ing the lower strike). That’s the more conservative bet. But the CBOE adjusts their margins.
you’re not going to get any premium. This area — between
implied volatility and historical volatility — helps me find OT: Getting back to your strategy, do you create put
the best risk-reward possibility. spreads in addition to simply selling uncovered puts in the
I’m just trying to find the optimum risk-reward ratio that S&P 500 futures? In other words, buying a lower-strike put
makes sense to me. It has worked. Over the last several for protection?
years, we’ve had the highest Sharpe ratio (risk-free EP: We did a couple of times last year in our main index
return/standard deviation) of any CTA program. program, but not in 2006.
The problem is I can’t go the distance out-of-the-money
that I’d like in most futures contracts. You can’t get any pre- OT: When you sell these spreads, do you buy and sell one
Allison Ellis
Ad sales West Coast
and Southwest
aellis@activetradermag.com
(626) 497-9195
Mark Seger
Account Executive
mseger@activetradermag.com
(312) 377-9435
In September, Padon’s more conservative strategy sold puts on S&P 500 EP: No. I would use the same strategy
futures that were at least 150 points (11.3 percent) below the market. and take the same risk every month.
We can’t sell put strikes further out.
The lower returns have to do with tim-
ing.
For example, our last drawdown
was in September 2003. That month
ended on a Tuesday. We were prof-
itable on the Monday and Wednesday
surrounding our monthly report date.
But on Tuesday, we lost ground. The
S&P 500 [bounced around] and put us
in negative territory for one day.
OT: In your diversified program, you In August, Padon’s diversified program sold $64 October puts and $100
sell options on other futures contracts October calls. The puts went into the money on Sept. 12, and he exited and
in addition to the S&P 500, right? sold $62 puts. Despite this loss, the strategy gained 1.5 percent overall.
EP: Yes — currencies, treasuries,
energies, and meats.