Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Andrew Scull (ed.), Cultural Sociology of Mental Illness : an A-to-Z Guide , Sage, 2014, pp. 316-17
…
3 pages
1 file
France is a unitary semi-presidential republic and a member of the European Union. On 1st January2012, the country had a population of 65.3 million. In 2010, it had a very high Human DevelopmentIndex (HDI) of 0.872. This figure notably takes into account French life expectancy, which is oneof the longest in the world.Created in 1945, the “sécurité sociale” is a cornerstone of the French social protectionsystem. The institution’s mission is to provide financial assistance to its beneficiaries when theyencounter costly life events. The health care arm (that includes pregnancy, disability and death) isthus a model of “Universal health care” and funds a substantial portion of the health care system, with the rest falling to private insurance, often through non-profit mutual insurers. The number of doctors per 1,000 inhabitants (3.22 in 2008) is one of the highest in the world. In 2010, the WHOconcluded its global evaluation of health care systems by underlining that France provided “close to best overall health care” in the world.The French mental health care system is organized within this framework.
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
Articles about health care in other countries are uncommon in CMAJ, so I was pleased to read the interesting News article about the French system. 1 Alas, Christina Lopes presents misleading conclusions from the World Health Organization's 2000 report on international health care systems 2 as have other commentators, including Michael Moore in his film Sicko. It is misleading and simplistic to state that "the World Health Organization … anointed the French health care system as the best in the world" and that it "ranked Canada 30th in the same survey." The World Health Organization report includes 9 tables with international rankings along with an additional summary table. France is ranked first in only 1 of the tables: Table , which indicates health system performance. This index was calculated by relating a country's overall health achievement to its expenditure on its health system. Simply put, France ranks first in efficiency. According to the World Health Organization, one must measure 5 things to assess a health care system: the overall level of health, the distribution of health in the population, the system's level of responsiveness, the distribution of responsiveness and the distribution of financial contribution. 2 The way in which the system deals with access to specialists and wait times, which Lopes highlights as a star feature of the French system, falls into the category of the system's level of responsiveness. The World Health Organization report combines these 5 features of a health care system into 1 composite measure, overall health system attainment, in Table . It is a country's ranking in Table , one can argue, that is the most important ranking: it provides an indication of how well the system works for the user. Canada ranks seventh in this table and France ranks sixth. Japan ranks first.
Health Affairs, 1993
Issues in Regulation Theory, 2004
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2000
Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ECO/WKP(2000)42 2 ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ This paper reviews the performance of French health care system from an economic viewpoint. It also provides some policy recommendations. The health system in France is regarded as delivering highquality services, with freedom of choice and generally no waiting lists for treatments. Access to medical services is equal among the population and, unlike in some other countries, people can get the treatments they need irrespective of their social status or work situation. It is therefore not surprising that the French population is relatively satisfied with the health system. As this paper points out, however, this high quality comes at a price: health expenditure in relation to GDP is among the highest in the OECD and risks increasing further in the future in the absence of adequate measures. Past reform efforts, which have shifted the cost to the patient through higher out-of-pocket payments, have proved ineffective and raised equity questions. A new approach is therefore necessary. This paper argues that the renewed reform effort should provide microeconomic incentives to alter both the consumption and prescription behaviour. A package of measures tailored to the particular institutional and social characteristics of the French system is proposed, which would reign in costs while preserving the main strengths of the system-quality of care, freedom of choice, and equity of access.
The Lancet, 2016
(the summary in French is below). Since 1945, the provision of health care in France has been grounded in a social conception promoting universalism and equality. The French health-care system is based on compulsory social insurance funded by social contributions, co-administered by workers' and employers' organisations under State control and driven by highly redistributive financial transfers. This system is described frequently as the French model. In this paper, the first in The Lancet's Series on France, we challenge conventional wisdom about health care in France. First, we focus on policy and institutional transformations that have affected deeply the governance of health care over past decades. We argue that the health system rests on a diversity of institutions, policy mechanisms, and health actors, while its governance has been marked by the reinforcement of national regulation under the aegis of the State. Second, we suggest the redistributive mechanisms of the health insurance system are impeded by social inequalities in health, which remain major hindrances to achieving objectives of justice and solidarity associated with the conception of health care in France. Depuis 1945, les politiques de santé en France s’appuient sur une conception sociale s’inspirant de deux principes : l’universalisme et l’égalité. Le système de santé français repose en effet sur un système de sécurité sociale obligatoire et fortement redistributif, financé par les contributions sociales et co-administré par les organisations patronales et salariales, sous le contrôle de l’Etat. Ce système est fréquemment désigné comme le « modèle français ». Dans cet article, le premier du numéro spécial du Lancet sur la France, nous remettons en question quelques idées reçues sur l’accès à la santé en France. Dans un premier temps, nous ouvrons la réflexion sur les transformations politiques et institutionnelles qui ont affecté la gouvernance de la santé au cours des dernières décennies. Nous montrons d’une part que le système de santé, loin d’être uniforme, repose sur une diversité d’institutions, mécanismes et acteurs des politiques de santé, d’autre part que la gouvernance de la santé a été marquée par une tendance au renforcement du rôle régulateur de l’Etat. Dans un second temps, nous suggérons que les mécanismes de redistribution du système d’assurance maladie sont bien actifs, mais que leur efficacité reste entravée par les inégalités sociales de santé, lesquelles constituent des obstacles majeurs à la réalisation des objectifs de justice et de solidarité qui sont au cœur de la conception sociale de la santé en France.
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: