Lethal Whites: A Light at the
End of the Tunnel
Several experts clarify what we now know,
and what we hope
to know soon about this devastating syndrome
By Dawn Walker
from the February 1997 Paint Horse Journal
 |
Lethal White: a foal of overo lineage,
born all white or mostly white. The foal may seem normal
at birth, but usually begins showing signs of colic
within 12 hours because of a non-functioning colon.
Because the syndrome is always fatal, lethal white foals
are often euthanized. |
Since the origin of the American Paint Stock
Horse Association in 1962, lethal white syndrome has been
a plaguing presence, lurking in the shadows of the breed's
success. For lack of a scientific explanation, or perhaps
to downplay the one negative aspect of the breed, Paint breeders
and the association itself adopted a "sweep it under the rug"
policy for many years.
But now, as the APHA watches its registration
and membership numbers climb ever skyward, and breeders see
their black and white overos bringing premium prices across
the country, each is uncomfortably aware of a matching increase
in the incidence of lethal whites.
After 30 years of questions, everyone seems
to agree it is time to get some answers.
The closest thing to an explanation of the
lethal white foal syndrome thus far has been an article written
by Dr. Ann Bowling of the University of California at Davis,
which was published in the August 1993 issue of the Paint
Horse Journal. In her article, Bowling proposed that the
three classes of horses that resulted from overo-to-overo
matings (overo, solid and lethal white) fit a model of overo
as a dominant gene with lethal effects in the homozygous state.
This model predicted that 25 percent of foals from two overo
parents would be lethal whites.
Bowling went on to say that the studbook definition
of overo may include more than one genetic entity, which complicates
the application of her model for understanding overo inheritance
and predicting lethal whites.
In a recent interview, Bowling stood by her
proposition, pointing out that there has been no successful
homozygous overo stallion to date, leading her to believe
that whatever causes homozygosity in overos is linked to lethal
white syndrome.
At the same time Bowling was formulating her
theory, the APHA and Portland State University in Portland,
Oregon, were doing pedigree studies of their own. For the
past 10 years, the APHA has collected surveys on lethal white
foals from its members and submitted them to a team at the
university for analysis.
In the first half of this article, Dr. Debbie
Duffield, a researcher at Portland State University who has
been working on the project since its inception, shares her
team's conclusions on how to predict the occurrence of lethal
white foals.
Recently, lethal white syndrome has also been
examined from a genetic standpoint. In July of 1996, a team
of researchers at the University of Minnesota sent the APHA
a comprehensive proposal for a grant to describe the inheritance
of lethal white syndrome and to locate the gene responsible.
In November, the APHA Executive Committee approved the $7,650
grant, and the project is now under way.
The project is headed by three researchers
at the university--Dr. James Mickelson, Dr. Stephanie Valberg,
and Dr. Elizabeth Santschi. In the second part of this article,
Dr. Santschi tells us what they know now, what theories they
plan to test, and what they hope to accomplish during the
next six months.
The Pedigree Perspective:
Dr. Debbie Duffield, Portland State University
Q:
What did you learn from the surveys submitted by
the association?
A: When we looked at the surveys, we
felt that the biases that were built in on people reporting
lethal whites overwhelmed the interpretation. We tried to
get rid of that bias by sending a random poll to breeders
asking only for the first foal born that year, and its sire
and dam.
The question we were asking ourselves was,
if we look at all overo-to-overo breedings, do we get one-quarter
solid foals, one-half overos, and one-quarter lethal whites?
Q:
What were the results of that poll?
A: The numbers were right on. We feel
that the poll strongly supported that the overo Paint gene
is acting predominantly as a lethal dominant as Dr. Bowling
predicted. By that, I mean that a horse that is overo is a
heterozygous horse. It has one overo gene and one non-overo
gene. A solid Paint is one that has two non-overo genes, and
a lethal white is one that has two overo genes.
That doesn't rule out modifiers that impact
how much color, or how high or low color extends. It just
says that most of the time it is going to operate that way,
and people can pretty safely base their breeding programs
on that.
Q:
If the overo gene is dominant, how would you explain
cropouts (when two Quarter Horses, two Thoroughbreds, or a
Quarter Horse and a Thoroughbred, produce an overo foal)?
A: There are two things that could be
going on. There could be modifiers that do indeed hide an
overo periodically. However, we think it is more likely that
the actual overo pattern isn't fully described yet--that sometimes
horses that are considered, say, Quarter Horses, are actually
overos. They are just not identified as such.
What we did was go back to every example we
had in our files where there was a cropout. And there was
always an instance where we would suspect that at least one
of the horses in their background had been an overo, by looking
at its picture.
Q:
Does this mean that a lot of Quarter Horses are
actually overos?
A: Actually, we thought the problem
would be bigger than it is. We have heard stories for years
that often Quarter Horse people hid those little bits of white
when they registered the animals. So, we thought that the
problem was going to be extensive among Quarter Horses. But
when we did the poll there were very few real cropouts.
Q:
How do you explain lethal whites that have occurred
from overo-to-solid or overo-to-tobiano crosses?
A: If you asked me, could I get a lethal
white from an overo and a tobiano, I would say no. However,
we do occasionally see that. The reason that we see it is
because there is actually overo there, it just isn't called
that. In fact, the true cross is probably overo-to-tovero.
A lethal white should not occur from an overo-to-solid
cross, either. However, some of the "solids" may actually
be overos that are not classified as overos.
The only true combinations that should produce
lethal whites are overo-to-overo and overo-to-tovero.
Q:
Do tobiano breeders need to worry about lethal
whites?
A: We want to alert tobiano and overo
breeders to some conditions that we see coming up a lot. More
and more, people are mixing the two lines. We're seeing a
lot of it in our tobiano testing. What is going to happen
is that after awhile, horses which kind of look tobiano, but
have overo in them, are going to start throwing lethal whites.
If someone stepped into that picture down the
line when those horses were doing that, they might think lethal
white syndrome was linked to the tobiano gene.
Q:
Did you find that lethal white foals occurred more
frequently among certain families of horses?
A: We never really saw that certain
lines of overo horses produced lethal whites more than any
others.
What we did was to go back through all the
polls and pull out lineages and check to see if there were
any that tended to come up again and again.
We did have certain horses whose names came
up more, but it was because people were breeding to them more
often. If you took into account the total number of breedings
to that horse, the proportion of lethal whites still fell
into the normal ratio.
More likely than not, although we don't feel
that we've proven it, it was not that certain lines had a
higher possibility of lethal whites, it was merely a reflection
of breeding preference.
Q:
Is the likelihood of a lethal white foal related to the amount
of white on the parents?
A: We saw no indication that the amount
of color on the parents gave any statistical leaning to the
probability of getting a lethal white foal.
Like with the lineages, what we did see was
that although a lot of lethal whites seemed to be coming out
of O3- and O4-type horses (color types shown on the registration
form), when we looked at how many breedings occurred between
horses of different color types, most of the breedings were
between O3s and O4s. So, again, the trend was probably related
to what people were choosing to breed.
Q:
Do all overos carry the lethal gene?
A: According to this theory, all overos
would carry the lethal white gene, meaning it's the overo
gene itself, and if you get two copies of it, you get lethal
white syndrome. We haven't seen any evidence that there is
an overo gene that doesn't carry it. However, there may be
other types of spotting, like sabino, that might not carry
it because they might be different from overo.
However, we didn't have a good way to separate,
say, sabinos, from frame overos in our study, so we can't
really address this point.
Q:
Could this explain why the incidence of lethal
white foals from overo-to-overo crosses isn't as high as 25
percent? Or is there another explanation?
A: I suspect some of them are aborted.
There were some cases in our studies where mares had aborted,
so it's possible. That might also be one reason why the lethal
white number isn't right at 25 percent in some studies.
Q:
If the researchers at the University of Minnesota
are able to identify the markers for the overo gene, how will
that affect breeders?
A: You've still got a problem on your
hands. It's important to find a marker, but until you can
do amniocentesis (analysis of the mare's amniotic fluid) on
horses, you still won't know before the baby is born whether
it is lethal. So the technology of being able to test a fetus
has to be developed, too, for the marker to be useful.
Right now the question is, did my foal get
two copies of the gene, or not? When the markers are identified,
you still have to find a way to get in and get a blood sample
from the baby. (They can't use the blood of the mare.) From
what I understand of horse reproduction, that's a problem.
You can't easily do an amniocentesis on a horse.
As the technology changes, and as they start
to do in-vitro fertilization with horses, then breeders can
capitalize on using the markers when they are developed. With
in-vitro fertilization, embryos that are going to be lethal
whites can be weeded out, and those that are normal, or overo,
can be implanted.
Cattle breeders are using this technology right
now with in-vitro fertilization. They can test embryo cells
after they have begun to divide to see whether the embryo
is carrying a particular marker. Then they save the embryos
that aren't, and get rid of the embryos that are.
Therefore, use of a marker for lethal white
also requires the acceptability of in-vitro fertilization.
But I think that's all coming. Everything is changing so fast.
Q:
What can breeders do now to avoid getting a lethal
white foal?
A: For the individual breeder, if they
breed overo to truly solid, then they will not get lethal
whites. They can also breed to a true tobiano.
With any overo-to-overo cross, they have a
25 percent chance of getting a lethal white.
The way I look at it for the industry is that
it's just the cost of breeding overos. Certainly, individual
breeders may have difficulty with that because they only have
one mare and if they get a lethal white foal, that takes them
out for the whole season.
But at this point, with just the current technology,
they are not going to be able to get away from this problem.
The Genetic Perspective:
Dr. Elizabeth Santschi, University
of Minnesota
Q:
From what point does your study begin? You say
you have a candidate gene for lethal white syndrome?
A: There are a couple of genes that
have been identified in people and in mice that have been
found to cause conditions that are very similar to lethal
white syndrome. What we're doing is looking at these candidate
genes and sequencing them--determining what their base pairs
actually code for in normal horses and in lethal whites--to
see if there is a difference.
The copy of the gene that is in the lethal
whites will hopefully be very different from those in normal
horses. What that will mean is that there is a high likelihood
that that gene is responsible for the condition.
It could be that it's not these two genes and
we have to go somewhere else. But if we're successful, and
find that a mutation in one of these genes is responsible
for this condition, then we go on and start looking for that
gene in various horses that had some lethal whites in their
pedigree and make sure it is not present in those that did
not. Then we can say more conclusively that this gene is responsible
for lethal white.
What we have to do is test a bunch of mares--those
who have produced lethal whites, and, for instance, Arabian
mares, who never produce lethal whites. We have to make sure
the mutation is never found in horses that never produce lethal
whites, is found in a certain percentage of mares that have
produced lethal whites, and is always found in foals that
are lethal whites.
Q:
What kind of time-frame are we looking at?
A: Within about six months we should
know whether or not the genes we are most interested in are
the culprits. But even if this particular gene is not responsible
for lethal whites, it is the first time these genes have been
sequenced in horses, and that is valuable in itself.
Q:
The current theory based on pedigree research strongly
shows that overo-to-overo crosses will produce solids, overos,
and lethal whites in a 1:2:1 ratio, meaning lethal whites
will occur in 25 percent of all matings. Does this theory
contradict your study?
A: It could turn out to be something
that is simple Mendelian genetics, which is where the homozygous
state of the gene is lethal. Then, if you have a heterozygous
mare, you certainly don't want to breed her to a heterozygous
stallion, because 25 percent of the time you are going to
get a lethal white foal.
If you were to assume that every overo was
a heterozygoteif it was simple one-gene inheritancethen
all overo stallions should sire the same percentage of lethal
whites.
But we know that's not true, right? Nobody
talks about any one horse siring 25 percent lethal whites.
People talk about it being around the 8 to 10 percent level.
Q:
Is it possible that the percentage of lethal whites
appears less than 25 percent because of early embryonic death?
A: Some people talk about early embryonic
death, which is what they think happens with a lot of homozygous
HYPP horses.
However, talking to Paint breeders, they don't
seem to think that they have any higher incidence of mares
resorbing or being in foal and coming up empty than anybody
else. But of course that hasn't withstood scientific scrutiny.
Q:
How else can you explain the observation that lethal whites
occur significantly less than 25 percent of the time in all
overo-to-overo matings?
A: It is hard to know for sure, but
I do talk to Paint breeders a lot. Many say, "You know, I
just don't have that many lethal whites," whereas other breeders
either admit it, or people who have bred to their horse say
it sires lethal whites all the time.
I think we may find out that there are genetic
differences between splashed whites, sabinos and frames, just
like there is more than one gene that controls spotting in
mice. With this, it is possible that not all combinations
will produce a lethal white foal in the homozygous state.
How that all sorts out is going to be very interesting.
It would seem that frame horses tend to be
the ones that are most likely to produce a lethal white. But
we have seen lethal whites out of sabino stallions. And splashed
whites are so uncommon that I'm not really sure how they fit
in. We are going to try and stick with the frames in our study
for now, because that will make it simple. But then we'll
branch out into the other types of overo.
Something else that I think is a bit of a problem
is, what is an overo? Dr. Phillip Sponenburg says that overo
has come to mean anything that is not tobiano.
I think we have to be very specific about what
we are calling an overo. That's why the registration papers
that have the pictures on them are so valuable to us.
Q:
Is there any factor besides genetics that may contribute
to lethal whites?
A: There has been some research done
in England with twin horses. Some guy took an embryo, split
it in half, and put the halves into two different mares. The
foals that were born were very similar, but they didn't have
the same white markings.
According to the old nature vs. nurture argument,
any trait is a combination of genetics and environment. What
is the intra-uterine environment that can affect the melanocytesthe
cells that contain color? They migrate from the neural crest,
which is where the nervous system develops, out to the body
to give it color. What they do is stop at a certain point
of the body or leg, and no color develops past that point.
We don't know what message these cells get
in order to move. In lethal white foals, we know they don't
get the message at all, because neither the melanocytes nor
the nerves that innervate the gut move. Some gene doesn't
get turned on to make the protein that tells these cells to
move.
Q:
How would you genetically explain a cropout?
A: Even if overo is dominant, if there
are genes that regulate its expression, it can be hidden.
For instance, if there is a second gene that is modifying
the expression of white, and the horse does not get white
over its knees or hocks, a horse that is genetically an overo
could be classified as a Quarter Horse.
I can look at some of my lethal white pedigrees,
and a stallion that I know has sired a lethal white will sometimes
be seven-eighths Quarter Horse. That confuses me, because
Quarter Horses are supposedly not overos. But maybe what they
are is minimally-marked overos.
If we can find this gene, then perhaps we can
go back and look within different phenotypes, and determine
whether those horses carry this gene.
Q:
What is the long-term goal of this study, as far
as helping breeders avoid producing lethal white foals?
A: What we're hoping to do is develop
a genetic (blood) test that may be somewhat crude, but which
may provide breeders with some information about a better
way to avoid lethal whites. Will we stumble upon something
that will help them breed for color? Maybe so, although I
sure wouldn't guarantee it.
Lethal whites may be the price we pay for breeding
for color, but it may be that it is only carried in some horses
with overo color. What I'm hoping to be able to find are some
overo horses who still produce color, yet don't carry the
lethal white trait.
That's kind of way out in the future, but that's
what we'd really liketo get rid of lethal whites but
still be able to have color.
 |
This illustration represents the model put forth
by Dr. Ann Bowling of the University of California-Davis,
and Dr. Debbie Duffield of Portland State University.
According to this model, in every overo-to-overo cross,
solids, overos, and lethal whites should occur in
a 1:2:1 ratio. This means that there is a 25 percent
chance of producing a lethal white foal each time
two overos are crossed. |
 |
 |
Overo 03 |
Overo 04 |
In their studies, researchers at Portland
State University found that many lethal white foals
came from crosses of O3 and O4 horses, the two overo
color types shown above. However, Duffield attributed
this trend to the fact that these were the most common
color types people were choosing to breed to. |
|
This is the classic coat pattern of a
frame overo, which is what the researchers at the University
of Minnesota are focusing on in their study. Dr. Elizabeth
Santschi said it seems that this type of overo tends
to produce more lethal white foals than, say, sabinos
(calicos) or splashed white overos. |
There are three issues
that may account for the fact that we do not see 25 percent
of all overo-to-overo crosses producing lethal whites:
1. Not all lethal white foals survive to birth.
Some are resorbed or aborted by the mare.
2. Not all lethal white foals that are born
are reported.
3. Not all patterns that are currently classified
as overo, such as sabino or splashed white, are lethal when
homozygous.
No Myth About It
In clarifying what we do know about lethal
white syndrome, it is necessary to dispel some myths that
have developed over the years.
Myth #1Lethal whites can occur only
from overo-to-overo matings.
Lethal whites can occur from any cross involving
two overos or two horses that have overo in their backgrounds.
Based on the forms that crossed her desk, APHA
Field Services Director Barbara Scheffler said that most lethal
whites arise from two overos.
"Probably 99 percent of them are overo-to-overo
crosses," Scheffler said. "But we have had incidents from
an overo parent and a Quarter Horse parent, an overo parent
and a tobiano parent, and an overo parent and a Solid
parent."
Myth #2All Paint foals born white
have lethal white syndrome.
While Paint foals that are born all white should
be highly suspect of having lethal white syndrome, there are
some white foals that are completely normal. While both might
appear normal at birth, a lethal white foal will soon (usually
within 24 hours) demonstrate several definite symptoms that
indicate its condition.
The most characteristic trait of lethal white
syndrome is a lack of gut activity, so a lethal white foal
will probably fail to pass its meconium and will also begin
to show signs of colic. Its condition will deteriorate quickly,
with or without treatment.
Myth #3A mare will not produce a lethal
white foal in two consecutive years.
If you are lucky, she will not. But if she
carries the lethal trait, and the stallion she is crossed
with also carries it, she has a one-in-four chance of producing
a lethal white foal every time she is bred to him.
Myth #4If the stallion has never produced
a lethal white, he is a safe bet to breed your mare to.
There are several reasons why this statement
is untrue. First, if the stallion is young and has only a
limited number of breedings, the fact that he has not yet
produced a lethal white does not mean he will not in the future.
Second, it is necessary to look at the color
of the mares the stallion was bred to who contributed to these
statistics. If the stallion is a tovero, but was crossed on
only tobiano mares, the likelihood of a lethal white would
be much less than if he were crossed on all overo mares.
Third, it is possible that the stallion has
conceived lethal whites, but that the embryos were resorbed
or aborted by the mares. However, there is not yet any kind
of blood test to confirm this notion. |