User talk:Sitush
 | An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
[edit]Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
[edit]Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Question about WP:RAJ.
[edit]Hello, I hope you don’t mind me leaving a question here if that’s all right. I wanted to ask something that you’ve probably answered in the past but unfortunately, I couldn’t find anything in my search. Does User:Sitush/CasteSources apply to all raj sources in general or is it specific to citations about the caste system during that era? I’ve seen conflicting opinions on this. I’ve read that Jadunath Sarkar is generally considered outdated for example, although he was a military historiographer. That made me assume that all sources from the raj era are generally considered outdated, not just ones focused on the caste system. But I can’t be too sure, so I wanted to ask. @Sitush Someguywhosbored (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness
[edit]Many years back. God bless. 2409:4085:D10:541B:B9BA:E2D2:9898:81E (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia needs you
[edit]It's been a long time. I hope you're doing well. If you get free time, make cleanups in South Asian groups articles. Wikipedia misses you! Kautilyapundit (talk) 11:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,